Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Close

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

All new nurses could face checks on compassion and values

  • 49 Comments

A government-commissioned review is likely to press for all new nurses and healthcare assistants to be screened for their values and ability to be compassionate, Nursing Times has been told.

An expert panel is reviewing the NHS Constitution and is expected to report to the Department of Health in coming weeks.

The DH will then consult on changes to the document, which the NHS is required to follow. The work is expected to form part of the response to the public inquiry into the Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust scandal, which is due to report to the health secretary next month.

The chair of the panel, high profile GP Professor Steve Field, told Nursing Times universities should interview all healthcare staff before giving them places, and use the values in the constitution as part of interviews. He said the review had discovered that at present several nursing schools in England did not interview.

He said: “Universities should be interviewing all healthcare professionals, not just offering them courses based on their A-Level grades. I despair of nursing schools and medical schools which don’t interview.

“[Without interviews] they can’t even role-play being caring and compassionate. If you can’t do that what hope have you got? The constitution should be part of the interviewing exercise.”

Professor Field said the constitution should also strengthen the rights and conditions of nurses and other staff. It should help ensure they are properly valued and regularly appraised.

He said: “What doesn’t come across clearly enough [in the current NHS Constitution] is that healthy, motivated, inspired staff make for far better compassionate care.

“We need a new principle for the NHS which values staff. Some feel stuck and don’t feel they have control over their lives and jobs.”

Professor Field also said healthcare employers should use the constitution’s values in interviews for all staff. In particular he said more attention should be paid to healthcare assistants and other unqualified staff. The role of HCAs may receive particular criticism from the Mid Staffordshire inquiry, and there have been calls for statutory regulation of the roles.

Professor Field said: “They [healthcare assistants] are integral to patient care but feel often left out because they are not professional nurses or doctors.”

Royal College of Nursing policy director Howard Catton, who is also on the expert review group, said: “There is a strong theme [from the review] that happy staff gives happy patients. If you get it right for staff you get it right for patients.

“If you get it right for staff you get it right for patients. Staff should feel values, respected, be treated with dignity and involved in decision making.”

  • 49 Comments

Readers' comments (49)

  • And I suppose they are suggesting a way to quantify and test for these qualities then? Thought not.

    And you want to get it right for the staff and have happy, productive workers? Then how about paying us a decent liveable wage that reflects our qualifications, skill and experience, sort out some decent working conditions that won't leave us burned out and in tears after every shift, give us more clinical staff on the floor so we can improve care for our patients and stop attacks on our pensions, our pay and our status and reputation from all corners.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • if this works on nurses, who are being used as the test cases, it will be extended to all politicians!

    Hopefully those doing the testing uphold all the values they are seeking in others and carry out their tests with compassion. Leading by example is after all a sign of excellent leadership!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'd love to know how they plan to do this!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Another dose of salts. I have been a NHS worker for 51 years. 46 years as a qualified staff.
    The NHS condones the idea of calling its staff Human resources.
    It changes the Minister of Health as much as a District Nurse changes a Patients bandages.
    It constantly renews itself without permission from anyone in particular least of all its users.
    It is now condoning not paying staff who are off work sick, for the first three days. (remember this is the NHS. punishing its Human resources for actually being ill.
    It is led by Corporate, (failed) administrators who know absolutely nothing
    about the roles of the staff that they mismanage.
    The NHS as a so called exemplar employer, has no real compassion itself, so it does not display any of those qualities that it expects from its workforce.
    If the NHS were a year, it would start on the first of January, and would stop, and start again, on the 20th of the same month, with nothing to show, apart from a new, but useless, computer programme.
    The complaints about new staff are fair, and they should be aware that they are supposed to become compassionate, however this has to be taught by People and organisations that are compassionate in the first place.
    Most of the Professors and their teaching staff have proved themselves to be poor practitioners in the first place. And many Trained staff (including myself) need to constantly challenge our practice.
    Compassion, can only be learned from others who have these skills, and can only exist in a compassionate environment.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tiger Girl

    '... being caring and compassionate. If you can’t do that what hope have you got?'

    Although this is a quality hard to test candidate's for, and hard to apply if staff are rushed off their feet most of the time, I do feel certain that the organisations representing patients will approve of this move.

    'They didn't seem to really care !' is a complaint frequently made by upset patients and upset bereaved relatives - and it also upsets most staff.

    'The DH will then consult on changes to the document, which the NHS is required to follow.'

    That statement isn't as clear-cut as its wording implies !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • When acute care is designed to rush patients through the system as quickly and cheaply as possible nurses do not lack empathy and compassion they often don't get the chance to show it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree that all potential nursing students should be interviewed, it's pretty appalling that they are not and this is one reason so many get through who really are not suited to the job.

    There is no doubt that HCAs should be regulated, how can anyone vote against this, they are working with the public.

    As for re-jigging the Constitution to make it more supportive for nurses - yes, great idea, nurses have no rights as far as many people are concerned.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    The NHS should work for patients, and for the staff.

    'Anonymous | 11-Sep-2012 11:16 am

    When acute care is designed to rush patients through the system as quickly and cheaply as possible nurses do not lack empathy and compassion they often don't get the chance to show it.'

    If as a patient/relative your own experience of the care is that it seemed 'uncaring', and you cannot see that this is because of lack of staff, you won't know the staff are being prevented from caring. But acute care - as in emergency care - is different from, for example, care of the elderly, isn't it ? If there are too few staff, then let the patients know this - then the patients might push the message !

    Anonymous | 11-Sep-2012 11:22 am

    'As for re-jigging the Constitution to make it more supportive for nurses - yes, great idea, nurses have no rights as far as many people are concerned.'

    Everyone should be treated decently - patients, nurses, relatives, cleaners, doctors and even managers !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • People are not treated decently, hence the need for a Constitution.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • everybody, in good physical and mental health, should have values and be capable of showing compassion, not just nurses.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.