Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

CQC issues warning over pressures on NHS staff


Poor medicines management and record keeping may be the first signs that staff are overstretched and could warn of more serious care failings, according to the Care Quality Commission.

The regulator’s annual “State of Care” report, published today, presents an analysis of the themes emerging from 13,000 inspections carried out by the CQC during 2011-12. 

Almost a fifth of NHS hospitals inspected by the regulator failed to meet standards on medicines management, as did a quarter of NHS community providers and 17% of mental health trusts.

Common problems included poor storage and incomplete records that medicines had been administered to patients. A further 22% of NHS hospitals, 19% of community services and 17% of mental health services failed standards on record keeping.

The report said CQC inspectors had found poor record keeping was often an early sign of “strain” on an organisation, “for instance, as a consequence of a shortage of staff and the resulting lack of time they have to complete all their tasks”.

CQC chief executive David Behan said: “Our report highlights concerns we have that pressures on some services are leading to problems in the quality of care, keeping people safe, treating people with dignity and respect, and involving people in decisions about their own care.”

However, he said these pressures “cannot be used as an excuse to deliver poor care”.

The report found 16% of hospital trusts inspected were understaffed.  Meanwhile, 23% of nursing homes and 16% of residential care homes were not meeting the CQC standard of having adequate staffing levels.

At the same time the report identified the growing demand for nursing care within social care settings and highlighted the growing pressure on staff from the increasing complexity of patients.

The CQC said 64 new nursing homes had registered with it during 2011-12 and there had been a 3.3% increase in the number of registered nursing beds. However, 15% of inspections of nursing homes found a lack of respectful care.

Crystal Oldman, chief Executive of the Queen’s Nursing Institute, said: “If more care is going to be delivered in the community, including in nursing homes, it is vital that there is more investment in well trained staff who have the time and the expertise to give high quality, compassionate and person-centred care to the most vulnerable members of society.”

In addition, the CQC report said more than 32,000 patients were admitted to hospital from care homes and went on to die there during 2011-12.

It said that, while some of these admissions may have been clinically appropriate, the fact a third of patients died within three days and half within a week suggested they could have been better cared for in their care home.

Most recent figures suggest 29% of people expressed a wish to die in their care home yet only 18% did so.

Jonathan Bruce, managing director of Prestige Nursing and Care, which provides agency staff to nursing and care homes, said it was “incredibly worrying” so many older people were not able to die in a location and surroundings they had chosen themselves.

Peter Carter, chief executive and general secretary of the Royal College of Nursing, said the report “echoed” RCN warnings that not enough hospitals, nursing and care homes were adequately staffed and, when coupled with the wrong mix of skills, was having a real effect on patient care.

“Already too many are failing to meet the CQC’s standards and this will only increase if action is not taken to improve staffing levels,” he said.

Mike Farrar, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, which represents managers, said staff, from the frontline to the board, needed to use the report to “scrutinise” the care they delivered.

He added: “We need to do more to encourage staff to speak out when they are unhappy about the standards of care or support provided on their ward.”


Readers' comments (40)

  • Tinkerbell

    when are these issues ever going to be addressed. To keep restating the problem is not a solution just a broken record.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am happy for the evidence to pile up. I am unhappy that my colleagues (with the exception of Tinkerbell and a few others)continually fail to use ALL the evidence to make their case and take action. Some, on another article, thought it better to blame the people who carried a piece of research rather than use it to their advantage. Nurses will never learn, will never do anything to stand up for themselves and will continue to blame everyone else.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • anon 8.33 - nurses do learn very quickly that they frequently find themselves banging their heads against brick walls.

    nurses do try and stand up for themselves, often resulting in being picked on by other staff, you quickly learn that you don't always get the support others promise.

    nurses have to blame others because they are not the ones who have created staff shortages and poor skill mix.

    this research suggests that staffing levels are one of the reasons for poor medicines management, but it is always just the individual nurse who is called to account, it's the nurse who gets disciplined, gets reported to the nmc, has to re-train in medicine management - not the management,not the person who wrote the off-duty, not the person who took one of the trained nurses off the ward to work on an even worse staffed ward, not the employer. How often are 'mitigating' factors such as staff shortages ever taken into account.

    Research is helpful if action is taken, if it's ignored then what was the point of it all. This only confirms what other studies have shown, the RN4CAST study stated staff felt they don't have the staff or time to get all their jobs done, it's all been said before - that is what we find so frustrating.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tinkerbell

    well i have taken this article to my colleagues this morning and we are going to see our management about how stressed some of our staff are feeling as the workload pressure is building up.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • the first two articles on this site today are this and the 1,000 staff shortages.

    when is something going to be done to address staffing levels, skill mix, lack of specific training, unregulated care and increasing workloads? how much research needs to be done, how many meetings do we need to have, how many incident forms do we have to submit, how many examples of poor care do we need, how many 'shock' stories need to be televised?

    there is such a thing as overload, too much of the same old, same old, eventually people stop listening.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How dare the CQC say they realise poor record keeping is an early sign of strain and then say that's no excuse - then the link this to poor care. In my my expereince the records can get behind becuase of the massively increased number of patients we are expected to see, to squeeze into each day's work. The concentration is therefore focused of the patients not the record keeping - this does NOT equate to poor care, its simply that the patients come first.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • David Behan needs to understand that under staffing & lack of time is a serious issue within the health service & that poor patient care is a symptom of this. Nurses do not want to provide poor patient care but sometimes they just cannot deliver the standard of care expected. Nurses are not super human (I really wish we were) & there are only so many hours in a day. Maybe he should be thinking of some reasonable solutions to the problem instead of critising the one group who strive hard to achieve the highest standards possible.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is plain that CQC members read the articles discussed here. It's just a shame they aren't capable of assimilating the facts first time around or even acting on the good sense and advice available from staff on the front line.

    Never mind, it makes them feel part of the service to write of potential problems in retrospect....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • that good old retrospect-ascope, so often used within the health service and so useful when those responsible don't want to be held responsible.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tinkerbell

    following a discussion with our managers this morning, they came to see us and offered reassurances on the minimum requirements. We then had a lovely get together and shared our food and actually had a proper break. I know on the wards this would be more difficult.

    We need to find ways to destress ourselves and that means supporting each other and we are hoping to have this get together meal every friday.

    Everyone seems abit calmer at the moment.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page20 per page50 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.