Does it matter which way up a rectal suppository is inserted? What do you think?
EXPERT COMMENT
Rectal suppositories are conveniently shaped medicated solid preparations for insertion into the rectum. They can vary in weight and usually consist of solid vegetable oil that dissolves at body temperature. Suppositories are manufactured in a torpedo shape with a pointed end (apex) and a blunt end. The blunt end is often concave forming a useful indention for the tip of a finger to push against.
The rectal route of drug medication is relatively painless and particularly useful for patients who are fasting or nil-by-mouth before or after surgery and for patients who are unable to tolerate oral medication
due to nausea and or vomiting. Suppositories also provide a useful route for medication in children who have needle phobia. Suppositories may be used for both local and systemic effect.
Historically suppositories were inserted pointed end first until the publication of a small study by Abd-El-Maeboud et al (1991) who recommended that suppositories were inserted blunt end first. The research suggests that suppository retention is more easily achieved if suppositories are inserted blunt end first because the squeezing action of the anal sphincter against the apex pushes (sucks) the suppository into the rectum. The research was pivotal in informing clinical practice culminating in clinical text books advocating a blunt end in first for suppository insertion.
However, if a suppository for local effect is inserted blunt end first using the anal sphincter to assist with insertion there is no guarantee that the suppository will be in contact with the bowel wall. Suppositories need body heat in order to dissolve and become effective. This could subject the patient to an ineffective, undignified and invasive procedure.
On the other hand, patients administering their own suppository may find blunt end more acceptable as there no need to insert the finger into the anal canal to push it in. This lends weight to inserting the blunt end first - especially if the suppository is for a systemic effect, as rectal absorption is more effective lower in the rectum as veins draining from this part of the rectum join the internal iliac veins. This means medication returns directly to the inferior cava, bypassing the portal circulation.
Gaye Kyle is the chair of the ACA education committee
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment.

From Behind the Rituals
Why do you do the things you do? How much of nursing practice is based on ritual and myth and how much on sound evidence? If you have a ritual you’d like to discuss here, email nursingtimescomments@emap.com


'Lansley must listen to nurses on the front line'





Readers' comments (4)
Anonymous | 13-Sep-2011 1:47 pm
the manufacturers are the real experts on this. but if they are more effective the wrong way round and do not cause further discomfort or damage to the patient then why not?
is there more risk of tissue damage if the narrower blunt end is inserted first?
Unsuitable or offensive?
Anonymous | 16-Sep-2011 0:13 am
If the blunt end first works in some cases, but there is a problem with contact with the bowel wall, then they should be shaped cylindrical. Oh my goodness, I wish I had patented that.
Unsuitable or offensive?
Mags | 25-Sep-2011 11:12 am
Just don't insert them sideways!
Unsuitable or offensive?
Debra Smallbone | 25-Sep-2011 6:04 pm
Ive seen them been inserted both ways! As a student, this has been a little confusing, however, the overall consenus from nurses I have worked along side is to insert apex (pointed) end. The study conducted was rather small, therefore, feel there needs to be more research in this area before a clear rationale can be provided.
Unsuitable or offensive?