By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Survey: Mid Staffs report influencing nurse leaders at local level

The national nursing strategy and the seminal report on Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust have both begun to have a direct impact on how nursing is managed at a local level, our survey suggests.

It found more than 90% of directors of nursing have made changes as a result of either the Francis report on Mid Staffordshire or NHS England’s nursing strategy Compassion in Practice.

Of the 47 nursing directors who responded to Nursing Times’ survey, 57% had made changes as a result of both documents.

In addition, 28% had made changes as a result of the Francis report alone and 9% only as a result of Compassion in Practice – the strategy that launched the “6Cs” last year.

Around 30 respondents gave further details about what they had done in response, with 21 saying they had reviewed and increased staffing levels. Other changes introduction included values-based recruitment, making ward sisters supervisory in status and encouraging staff to be more open and learn from mistakes.

The workforce reviews appear to be further evidence of trusts becoming concerned about patient safety in the wake of the Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust Public Inquiry report – the so-called “Francis effect” identified by a Nursing Times investigation last month. It found 71% of trusts had increased their nursing establishment in the past year.

Despite these changes, less than half, 44%, thought the report would help nurses to prevent similar situations to Mid Staffordshire.

The survey also found the majority of nursing directors, 60%, thought the Francis report was a fair and balanced analysis of the issues facing nursing today.

There was less support for the government’s initial response with 38% feeling it was unhelpful and unbalanced. Just 15% agreed the proposals in the response would lead to improvements.

However, many respondents complained that both the report and the government’s initial response to it had been overly focused on nursing, compared with doctors and managers.

One director said: “Nurses have rightly looked at their requirement for change in the [Francis report], but were left with the uncomfortable view that the government felt they alone were responsible for the events that unfolded.”

The government’s full response to the Francis report is expected later this month.


Are you able to Speak Out Safely? Sign our petition to put pressure on your trust to support an open and transparent NHS.

Readers' comments (1)

  • Just a JOKE - I'm wondering how many Directors of Nursing, are figuring out how to make any complaints about failures at ward level, be 'deflected' (i.e. blamed on) towards someone between ward level and them?

    They wouldn't really think of doing that - which is why I'm joking.

    Now, if we were talking about politicians ...

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!