Two studies explored the continence care of nursing home residents
Saxer, S. (2009) Investigating the standard of continence care in nursing homes. Nursing Times; 105: 29.
This article describes the results of two studies that explored the prevalence, incidence and risk factors of urinary incontinence among residents in Swiss nursing homes and the knowledge and practice of nurses and nurse assistants in dealing with residents with urinary incontinence.
Keywords: Nursing home residents, Urinary incontinence, Risk factors
- This article has been double-blind peer reviewed
Susi Saxer, PhD, MNS, RN, is postdoctoral research fellow, Institute of Applied Nursing Science of the University of Applied Science (IPW-FHS), St Gallen, Switzerland.
Involuntary loss of urine is a problem, especially in ageing adults (Ostaszkiewicz et al, 2004; Wyman et al, 2004). Urinary incontinence substantially increases the risk of being admitted to hospital or a nursing home (Thom at al, 1997).
Swiss nursing homes assist residents to take part in everyday activities, with medical and nursing services when required. There are communal, municipal, cantonal and private nursing homes, with from 15-20 to 300 residents. The nursing department consists of the head of the department, head of each ward and nurses, student nurses, nurse assistants and volunteers.
Prevalence, incidence and risk factors
The first study evaluated the prevalence, incidence and risk factors for urinary incontinence among nursing home residents aged 65 and older.
A secondary analysis was performed using data from the Minimum Data Set 2.0 Resident Assessment Instrument, which is used for routine patient assessment. This has 16 areas, including those often associated with nursing home residents - for example, cognitive abilities and activities of daily living. The following items from the Minimum Data Set were included in this research:
- Urinary incontinence - this is defined as at least two episodes of involuntary loss of urine within one week. (Residents with a catheter are considered to be continent, but few residents in Swiss nursing homes have a catheter and residents who are incontinent wear pads.);
- Cognitive abilities;
- Demographic data - gender, age and time of admission.
The sample for prevalence at a specific point in time consisted of 2,610 residents, and for prevalence at admission 2,719 residents were included.
Of the residents studied, 51.5% were incontinent. Men and women were equally affected.
With increasing age, more residents were incontinent. The longer the residents had lived in the nursing home, the more likely they were to be urinary incontinent (Table 1) (Saxer et al, 2008a). When people were admitted, 37% were urinary incontinent. Women were less likely to be urinary incontinent than men (women 34%, men 43%).
|Table 1. prevalence of urinary incontinence over a two-year period||Men||Women|
|After 6 months||44%||42%|
|After 12 months||47%||51%|
|After 18 months||53%||54%|
|After 24 months||57%||62%|
|Source: Saxer et al (2008a)|
At admission and over time, residents who were not able to move in bed were most at risk of developing incontinence. The risk of incontinence at admission was two times higher for residents with ‘difficulties moving in bed’ than for those without. Six months after admission, the risk was 5.9 times higher and 12 months after admission 7.7 times higher (Saxer et al, 2005).
The second most important risk factor was ‘deficits in long-term memory’. At the time of admission, the risk of developing incontinence was 1.4 times higher and six months after admission 5.3 times higher for residents with these difficulties than for people without (Saxer et al, 2005).
Discussion and conclusion
At admission, the prevalence of incontinence was 37%, which is much lower than the prevalence at other times. This may be because residents were in better health at admission.
Women have less urinary incontinence than men at admission. Men may be looked after for longer at home than women (Saxer et al, 2008a).
The lower prevalence of urinary incontinence at admission is an important finding. A specific urinary incontinence assessment at admission is important in the prevention of new incontinence (Saxer et al, 2008a). An examination of risk factors suggests that mental and mobility training could reduce urinary incontinence (Saxer et al, 2005).
Nurses’ and nurse assistants’ knowledge and practice
More than 50% of care home residents have urinary incontinence (Saxer et al, 2008a; Adelmann, 2004; Aggazzotti et al, 2000).
There are effective interventions for urinary incontinence in older people (Fantl et al, 1996). For example, prompted voiding is an important method, especially for older people without or with minor cognitive impairment (Schnelle et al, 2002; Ouslander et al, 2001; Fantl et al, 1996).
A barrier to the implementation of treatments is nurses’ lack of knowledge of assessment and treatment incontinence (Watson et al, 2003; Lekan-Rutledge et al, 1998). Therefore, it is important to assess nurses’ knowledge and practice so that they can receive training and education.
This study aimed to explore nurses’ and nurse assistants’ knowledge and practice about urinary incontinence.
A cross-sectional written questionnaire was used to measure the knowledge and practice of nurses and nurse assistants from different nursing homes. This was developed for this study and validated (Saxer et al, 2008b).
The sample consisted of 199 nurses and 116 nurse assistants in municipal nursing homes in Zurich. The education of nurses lasts three years and the education of nurse assistants one year. Nurses are responsible for providing and planning care. Nurse assistants do more routine care.
Nurses answered 67% of all questions correctly and nurse assistants 56%. More than 90% of the nurses and nurse assistants answered the following two items correctly:
- Urinary incontinence can occur more often in sneezing, coughing and walking;
- Toilet training can improve incontinence in older people requiring care.
More than 80% of nurse assistants did not know the right answer to the item:
- Stress incontinence is caused by psychological problems.
The biggest differences were found in questions about medications and urinary incontinence. Two-thirds of the nurses knew the correct answers, but only one-third of the nurse assistants did (Saxer et al, 2008b). The actions of nurses and nurse assistants were divided into four categories:
- Drinking habits and excretion;
- Assessment and information;
Nurses and nurse assistants perform continence-related actions only ‘sometimes’ or ‘often’ at best. Both groups had the best results in the ‘Support’ category, for example helping a patient to the toilet, and the most deficits in the ‘Documentation’ category. In this category, for example, 40% of the nurses and nurse assistants reported ‘never’ in response to the following item:
- I note in the documentation how much urine the resident loses in an incontinence episode.
The largest difference between nurses and nurse assistants was in the category ‘Assessment and information’ (Saxer et al, 2008b).
Discussion and conclusion
The results show that nurses and nurse assistants have an average knowledge about incontinence.
Nurses, who have the responsibility for the residents and care planning, should have a larger knowledge base. Nurses and nurse assistants do not perform the same tasks and did not have the same deficits, so both groups need support.
It is not surprising that actions for the ‘Assessment and information’ category were carried out by nurses rather than by nurse assistants, because these tasks are more in line with their responsibility.
Actions in the ‘Documentation’ category were often not carried out. The low score of the nurses is remarkable because the responsibility for documentation lies mainly with them. Nurse assistants also have tasks related to documentation, such as filling out a bladder and drink diary. Therefore, both groups need support.
With this support, fewer residents will become urinary incontinent and the care of residents with urinary incontinence will improve.
Adelmann, P.K. (2004) Prevalence and detection of urinary incontinence among older medicaid recipients. Journal of Health Care for Poor and Underserved; 15, 99-112.
Aggazzotti, G. et al (2000) Prevalence of urinary incontinence among institutionalized patients: a cross-sectional epidemiological study in a midsized city in northern Italy. Urology; 56: 2, 245-249.
Fantl, J.A. et al (1996) Urinary Incontinence in Adults: Acute and Chronic Management. Clinical
Practice Guideline, No. 2, 1996 update. AHCPR Publication No 96-0682. Rockville: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.
Lekan-Rutledge, D. et al (1998) In their own words: Nursing assistants’ perceptions of barriers to implementation of prompted voiding in long-term care. Gerontologist; 38: 3, 370-378.
Ostaszkiewicz, J. et al (2004) Habit retraining for the management of urinary incontinence in adults. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004; issue 2. Art No: CD002801.pub2. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002801.pub2.
Ouslander, J. et al (2001) Prompted voiding for nighttime incontinence in nursing homes: is it effective? Journal of the American Geriatric Society; 49: 6, 706-709.
Saxer, S. et al (2008a) Prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence of Swiss nursing home residents at admission and after six, 12 and 24 months. Journal of Clinical Nursing; 17: 18, 2490-2496.
Saxer, S. et al (2008b) Nurses’ knowledge and practice about urinary incontinence in nursing home care. Nurse Education Today; 28: 8, 926-954.
Saxer, S. et al (2005) Risk factors for urinary incontinence in nursing home residents. Swiss Medical Weekly; 135, 495-502.
Schnelle, F. et al (2002) Translating clinical research into practice: a randomized controlled trial of exercise and incontinence care with nursing home residents. Journal of the American Geriatric Society; 50: 9, 1476-1483.
Thom, D.H. et al (1997) Medically recognized urinary incontinence and risks of hospitalization, nursing home admission and mortality. Age and Ageing; 26: 5, 367-374.
Watson, N.M. et al (2003) Use of the agency or health care policy and research urinary incontinence guideline in nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatric Society; 51: 12, 1779-1786.
Wyman, J.F. et al (2004) Shaping future directions for incontinence research in aging adults: executive summary. Nursing Research (Supplement); 53, S1-S10.