Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

NMC fails to rule out fee rise in quest to clear FtP backlog


The head of the Nursing and Midwifery Council has promised to go “back to basics” to tackle the mounting backlog of fitness to practise cases – but warned it could take up to three years and a fee rise could not be ruled out.

Speaking following the launch of the interim report of the Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence’s strategic review of the regulator, NMC acting chief executive Jackie Smith said they would be pausing or stopping all non-essential work to focus on tackling the backlog of around 4,000 cases.

She accepted the report’s findings that projects such as campaigning for the regulation of healthcare assistants had “distracted the NMC from its core functions”.

“The report reflects the fact that the NMC had lost its way and perhaps focused on non-core priorities. The NMC has a problem; that problem is fitness to practise and until we sort it out we should not be focusing on activity that deflects us from that functions… We need to get back to basics,” she said.

The review was ordered by the Department of Health in January following the departure of chief executive and registrar Professor Dickon Weir-Hughes, a registered nurse. He had been an outspoken campaigner for HCA regulation.

The NMC has also stopped plans for a student index, designed to keep track of individuals who have moved between universities, and halted its critical standards intervention programme, which was set up in the wake of high profile nursing care scandals to look for systemic failure in organisations. It is also looking at reducing the amount of guidance and advice it issues.

However, Ms Smith was unable to guarantee there would not need to be a hike in registration fees to cover the costs of bringing the FtP backlog under control, something she estimated could take “between two and three years”.

“Fitness to practise requires a significant amount of money. We are reviewing our resources practically on a daily basis and will be taking a financial strategy to our council in June… The strategy will have to look at fees.”

The CHRE’s interim report was critical of the relationships between the NMC’s chief executive and his team, council members and NMC staff, some of whom reported they were reluctant to approach the chief executive with concerns. The report also criticised former chair Tony Hazell, who resigned three weeks ago, for failing to provide necessary leadership.

The report recommended the posts of chair and chief executive be filled on a permanent basis “swiftly”. But it said there was no need for either of them to be registrants, which is likely to fuel fears about the loss of professionally led regulation. Both Unison and the Royal College of Nursing have previously signalled their concerns over the issue.

However, the report also recommended that the NMC consider splitting the role of chief executive and registrar into two.

CHRE chief executive Harry Cayton said there was “no reason” the posts should not be held by a nurse or midwife, but it was “not necessary” to do the job.

He said: “Professionally led regulation has been dying for some time. It’s about shared regulation between the professions and the public. I’m certainly not suggesting that there shouldn’t be 50% of the council from the nursing profession.”

In addition the report recommended that the NMC’s 14 member ruling council be reduced in size.

Unison head of nursing Gail Adams said the NMC needed to be in a “strong position” to ensure it was “fit to carry out the vital role of self regulation for nursing”.

“The interim management team have done a good job but the appointment of a permanent CEO and chair will give the NMC stability and impetus to help make progress,” she said.

She added that Unison “recognised the hard work” done by NMC staff but said there had previously been a “lack of effective focused leadership at the very top”, which in turn had “undermined their ability to deliver the essentials of regulation”.

“The CHRE make some strong criticisms and we want the NMC to improve its transparency. It should be the norm there as it is in other organisations, for decisions to be deliberated and decided upon in public.

“To date they have carried out many of their deliberations behind closed doors and, while the public may have been able to read about outcomes, they have not been able to question those decisions.”


Readers' comments (41)

  • Tinkerbell

    it seems we have to pay for everyones elses incompetency, whether that be the bankers, this misguided government and now the NMC. We're just the low hanging fruit, pop your purse open.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • will it be subsidized or an interest free loan offered?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yeah more money to be paid out......i need to win the lottery

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Its far too expensive already. When I qualified in 1985, we were told that that we pay £65 to register, and then that is it for life! What a big, fat lie that was.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Fit for purpose? Or just fit to raise as much money as possible from us??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yes when I qualified in 1964 I paid what I was told was a lump sum to register Not £75 every year Where did this come from?. I was working on bank after retiring but got so little bank work because of cutbacks it was daft to be paying £75 to stay on register .I quit ! best thing i ever did No stress anymore.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • When i qualified in 1998 it was £37 every three years , if i recall correctly.

    Now £75 every year.

    They should pay us to stay on the register, if it keeps increasing ppl will leave

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • all those who paid a one off lump sum to register as an SRN for life with the GNC should get a full refund for all the subsequent fees paid tri-annually and annually to the UKCC and the NMC! They should also have the right to retain their original qualification of SRN for life as our predecessors did!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The NMC have been talking about this for a few years now seems like they've found an excuse to now. Didn't they spend a fortune recently upgrading to swanky new offices?. It wouldn't be so bad if we still got the little booklets like the ones we used to get periodically from the U.K.C.C. at least you thought you were getting something for your money. All we seem to get from the N.M.C. is begging letters saying how overworked and poor they are. 3 years 7 months and counting to retirement day.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NMC unfit to practise more like!! Yes paid one off fee when I qualified in 1981..change the name of the organisation supposedly regulating the profession & They can charge what they like then! So be prepared for a huge rise & guess what a salary freeze for the foreseeable future..wouldn't recommend nursing but then who will look after me when I'm old & crumbly hobbling around the ward?!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page20 per page50 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs