Multiple sclerosis could be treated with tablets
People with multiple sclerosis (MS) could soon benefit from tablets to treat the condition, it has been announced.
Job promotion
Hospice Staff Nurses - £28,341 - £39,655 inc. p.a, London, click here to apply.
Click here for more vacancies at Nursing Times Jobs Express.
The news that pills could be available within two years follows a successful trial period for two medicines.
Both medicines competing to be the first world’s first oral treatment for multiple sclerosis dampen the immune response which causes the related nerve damage.
Pharmaceutical company Novartis developed fingolimod - a once-a-day treatment. German-based drug company Merck also introduced the longer lasting cladribine to the table. Patients using cladribine would take between 20 and 40 tablets over a year.
The New England Journal of Medicine published the results from clinical trials of both drugs, with each medicine showing strong signs of holding back the disease’s progression and reducing the chance of relapsing.
Between 55% and 58% of patients taking cladribine were less likely to suffer a relapse than those given a placebo pill.
Fingolimod enjoyed similar success, with a relapse reduction rate of 54% to 60% found among patients using the drug compared to those taking the placebo pill.
When it came to stopping the disease progressing, the drugs drew level, with both reducing chances by a third with no major side effects.
Although the drugs will be available by 2011, it is not yet known if the NHS will regard them as cost-effective enough to be made available on prescription.
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment.
Online training units, written and reviewed by experts. Earn two hours' CPD and a personalised certificate for your portfolio.
Subscribers get five FREE learning units and non-subscribers can access each learning unit for £10 + VAT.


Maintain pressure on reforms to protect NHS




Readers' comments (1)
Katie Williams | 21-Jan-2010 1:55 pm
My mother suffers from MS. Surely the fact the drug may not be considered "cost effective" is irrelevent. If the drug prevents relapses, provides sufferers with a better quality of life and a future free of this horrible disease then the NHS should make it freely available to all and not just the people who would be able to afford it if it were not available on prescription.
Unsuitable or offensive?