Managing stress and pain to prevent patient discomfort, distress and delayed wound healing
Evidence suggests stress slows the healing of wounds but pain may also play a part. Regular assessment could improve patients’ quality of life and recovery time
Kazia Solowiej, BSc psychology, is research assistant; Dominic Upton, PhD, FBPsS, CPsychol, is head of psychological sciences; both at the University of Worcester.
Solowiej K, Upton D (2010) Managing stress and pain to prevent patient discomfort, distress and delayed wound healing. Nursing Times; 106: 16, early online publication.
This article explores the relationship between stress and delayed wound healing and the role of pain as a stressor. It offers practical advice on regular assessment and management of stress and pain during wound care.
Keywords: Stress, Pain, Wound healing
- This article has been double-blind peer reviewed
Techniques to reduce pain and stress during wound treatments include the following:
- Interact with and listen to patients;
- Encourage them to articulate their pain experience;
- Implement coping strategies (focus or distraction techniques);
- Use warm cleansing solutions;
- Encourage patients to participate in their own dressing removal;
- Ensure correct selection and application of dressings;
- Regularly review the frequency and necessity of dressing changes.
Source: adapted from Hollinworth (2005)
Acute and chronic wounds can cause considerable pain and discomfort for patients. They can also cause significant stress, which is often associated with an individual’s response to physical and emotional threats (Ice and James, 2007). Prolonged stress can have a detrimental effect on health and cause a number of psychological and physiological symptoms, for example, poor coping and reduced immune function.
A recent review of stress and wound healing studies found that stress is associated with impaired wound healing and this is consistent across a variety of clinical and experimental studies, and acute and chronic wound types (Walburn et al, 2009). Both pain and stress can impact on wound healing and psychological wellbeing (Solowiej et al, 2009), and this can also have a negative effect on patients’ quality of life (QoL).
Although there is considerable evidence suggesting a link between stress and delayed wound healing, little is known about how pain may influence this relationship. This is important because if nurses can reduce pain (and/or stress) patients’ QoL and rate of healing could improve.
Experience of pain
Experience of pain is highly subjective and can be influenced by psychological, emotional and social factors. Pain is a personal experience, for example, a dressing change may be excruciatingly painful for some patients, but only mildly painful for others.
Wound pain can result from the wound itself but can also be caused by treatments for the underlying condition (Solowiej et al, 2009). It is well established that psychological factors, including stress and anxiety, can play a role in the perception of pain, for example under conditions of increased stress, the anticipation of pain at dressing change can lead to an increase in pain severity (Melzack and Wall, 1996).
Kammerlander and Eberlein (2002) conducted a survey of nurses’ views about wound pain and trauma. The majority perceived dressing removal and wound cleansing as the most painful wound treatment procedures. In addition, a multinational survey of the assessment of pain at dressing change from patients’ perspective revealed similar findings (White, 2008). A consistent trend emerged to suggest that pain levels (measured using the visual analogue scale, VAS) increased considerably during dressing removal compared with pain scores taken just before the treatment began. Likewise, results obtained from an international survey of dressing-related pain revealed that over 62% of patients reported that their pain took up to two hours to subside after a dressing change (Price et al, 2008). In this study 40% of patients also indicated that the pain at dressing change was the worst part of living with a wound.
Stress and wound healing
The physiological processes involved in wound healing (Ebrecht et al, 2004; Broadbent et al, 2003; Altemus et al, 2001) have also been studied and the impact that stress can have on would healing clearly demonstrated. For example, stress can increase the production of the hormone cortisol and if this increase is maintained wound healing can be impaired (Sivamani et al, 2009). Raised levels of cortisol can lead to myopathy, weakness, fatigue and a suppressed immune function (Melzack and Wall, 1996).
It is known that stressors such as pain can cause a set of physiological responses, for example elevated cortisol levels, heart rate, blood pressure and respiration rate, which can impact on skin physiology (Altemus et al, 2001). As a physical and psychological stressor itself, pain may put patients at a greater risk of delayed healing (Christian et al, 2007). Research evidence has demonstrated an association between stress and reduced immune function, which can be detrimental to wound healing. For example, punch biopsy wounds took almost 1.25 times longer to heal in a sample of women caring for a relative with Alzheimer’s disease, than in a matched-pair control group (Kiecolt-Glaser et al, 1995). Similarly, Ebrecht et al (2004) found that high stress scores were negatively correlated with the speed of wound healing. In addition to this, results of cortisol samples taken from participants revealed that as cortisol levels increased, the speed of wound healing decreased. These findings suggest that stress can impact on wound healing, and that increased cortisol levels play a role in this effect.
In studies of patients with acute surgical wounds there is also evidence on the relationship between stress and wound healing. Broadbent et al (2003) found that high levels of preoperative stress in patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery were associated with lower levels of proinflammatory cytokines in the wound fluid. It is known that wound inflammation is needed to clear debris and infection, but if levels of proinflammatory cytokines are reduced then this process may cause damage that delays the healing process (Bosch et al, 2007). On the other hand, Holden-Lund (1988) demonstrated that surgical patients who had undergone a relaxation intervention experienced significantly less anxiety and lower cortisol levels one day after their surgery compared with a control group. This indicates that implementing an intervention to reduce stress could be associated with faster wound healing.
A study investigating the impact of stress on chronic wound healing demonstrated that delayed healing was associated with higher anxiety and depression scores (Cole-King and Harding, 2001). Patients categorised in the top 50% of scores were found to be four times more likely to experience delayed healing than those in the bottom 50%. Similarly, a study exploring the prevalence of anxiety and depression in people with chronic leg ulceration categorised 27% as depressed and 26% as suffering from anxiety (Jones et al, 2006).
The findings of these studies suggest that stress can contribute to delays in wound healing. Moreover, stress can affect healing in both psychological and physiological ways. However, evidence to suggest that pain can influence the relationship between stress and wound healing is limited.
Assessing stress and pain during wound care
The current literature provides evidence supporting the relationship between stress and wound healing. Although less is known about the influence of pain in this relationship, it is important for nurses to acknowledge both pain and stress in clinical practice. If pain and stress are assessed and managed effectively during wound care, this could contribute to faster wound healing.
A number of methods are widely used in experimental settings to measure and assess pain and stress, which could be implemented by nurses as part of routine wound care. It is beneficial to measure pain and stress in patients before, during and after wound treatments such as dressing changes, to determine any differences in the severity of these symptoms.
Physiological symptoms of stress can be measured relatively easily using methods that may already be part of routine wound care. For example, increased heart rate, blood pressure and respiration rate are all physiological signs of stress. However, these assessments should be accompanied by other measures of stress to eliminate alternative causes of symptoms, as increased heart rate or blood pressure could be due to many other factors.
Alongside these physiological indicators, psychological measures of stress can be used, which are designed to obtain emotional responses from patients self-reporting their personal experience of stress. There are many different types of psychological tools for measuring stress, for example the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (Cohen, 1983), which is a self-report questionnaire that measures the extent to which situations in patients’ lives, such as dressing change, are perceived as stressful. This measure has been widely used in experimental settings and is recommended for use in clinical practice. An advantage is that it focuses on patients’ appraisal of stressful situations as opposed to the number of stressful situations experienced by an individual. However, patients are instructed to complete the items with reference to how they have been feeling over the past month, which may not measure stress specifically associated with wound treatments.
Other examples of psychological measures of stress include the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Zigmond and Snaith, 1983) and the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (Speilberger, 1968). Both are suitable for nurses to use to measure anxiety (a reaction to stress) in clinical practice. The STAI consists of items that measure specific causes of anxiety such as dressing change, as well as items that measure more general long term anxiety traits. Similarly, the HADS allows for the assessment of specific anxiety.
If pain, as a stressor, has the potential to contribute to delays in wound healing, then accurate and frequent assessment of pain should be incorporated into routine wound care. A review of pain and wound care studies identified that nurses consistently rated patients’ experience of pain lower than patients did themselves (King, 2003), suggesting that more attention should be paid to patient feedback during the wound care process.
It is apparent from the literature that both patients and nurses regard dressing change and cleansing as the most painful wound treatments. Pain can be measured using a variety of self-report methods, for example pain rating scales. These include verbal, numerical and visual analogue scales (Fig 1|), all of which require patients to rate their current level of pain using either numbers, describing words or placing a cross on a line to indicate the severity of pain.
Pain can also be assessed using multidimensional measures, for example the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) (Melzack, 1995). As well as measuring pain intensity, the items in this questionnaire are designed to assess different components of reported pain, how pain changes over time, and the factors that relieve or increase it. As a result of this, the MPQ is sensitive to treatment-related changes and can produce information on the specific effects of a treatment on the sensory, affective and evaluative dimensions of pain.
Implications for nursing practice
The effect of stress on wound healing has been demonstrated in many studies and this needs to be taken into account when caring for patients with wounds in clinical practice. Despite the limited evidence for the role of pain in this relationship, both stress and pain should be assessed and managed during the wound care process to prevent patient discomfort, distress and delayed healing.
A thorough person centred assessment is essential to provide sensitive and effective management of wound pain (Hollinworth, 2005). Nurses need to observe patients’ behaviour (both verbal and non verbal) as well as implementing standard assessments as this can help to identify signs of pain and stress (see Table 1).
Both psychological and physiological measures can be used to monitor changes associated with stress and pain as well as patient feedback on their perception of stress and pain. Such routine assessments at the beginning of and during treatments should be undertaken, to ascertain patients’ individual needs, such as effective pain relief (White, 2008).
In order to maintain patient comfort and trust in nursing care, patients should be encouraged to participate in their wound care. In the international dressing-related pain survey (Price et al, 2008), over 80% of patients reported that they liked to be actively involved in dressing changes. They felt it was beneficial to receive effective analgesics, and for nurses to be careful and gentle with their wound. In addition to this, many patients noted the importance of communication during wound treatment. In particular, they valued being listened to, consulted with and distracted from wound care procedures.
The correct selection of dressings can also contribute to improving pain, stress and QoL. The World Union of Wound Healing Societies (WUWHS) (2007) identified that soft silicone adhesive dressings are advantageous compared with other dressing types because they produce minimal pain and trauma at dressing changes, provide good adherence to the skin without strong bonding, stick instantly to the skin, and are easy to remove to check the wound and then re-apply (WUWHS, 2007). White (2008) also found that soft silicone adhesive dressings could significantly reduce pain at dressing change.
Nursing care is the key to safe pain relief and therefore to optimal wound healing.
There is increasing evidence supporting the relationship between stress and the delayed healing of wounds, suggesting that successful assessment and management of stress during wound care will prevent delays in healing.
Minimising pain could reduce its effect as a stressor; however research is needed to demonstrate the role of pain in the relationship between stress and wound healing. Despite this, assessment and management of pain and stress as part of routine wound care could provide the basis for faster wound healing and improved QoL for patients with acute and chronic wounds.
Altemus M et al (2001) Stress-related changes in skin barrier function in healthy women. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology; 117: 309-317.
Bosch JA et al (2007) Depressive symptoms predict mucosal wound healing. Psychosomatic Medicine; 69: 597-605.
Broadbent E et al (2003) Psychological stress impairs wound repair following surgery. Psychosomatic Medicine; 65: 865-869.
Christian LM et al (2007) Stress and wound healing. Neuroimmunomodulation; 13: 337-346.
Cohen S (1983) The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Berkshire: NFER Nelson.
Cole-King A, Harding KG (2001) Psychological factors and delayed healing in chronic wounds. Psychosomatic Medicine; 63: 2, 216-220.
Ebrecht M et al (2004) Perceived stress and cortisol levels predict speed of wound healing in healthy male adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology; 29: 798-809.
Feldt K (2000) The checklist of verbal and non-verbal pain indicators. Pain Management Nursing; 1: 1, 13-21.
Holden-Lund C (1988) Effects of relaxation with guided imagery on surgical stress and wound healing. Research in Nursing and Health; 11: 4, 235-244.
Hollinworth H (2005) Pain at wound dressing-related procedures: a template for assessment. tinyurl.com/wound-pain
Ice GH, James GD (2007) Measuring Stress in Humans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones J et al (2006) Depression in patients with chronic venous ulceration. British Journal of Nursing; 15: 11, S17-23.
Kammerlander G, Eberlein T (2002) Nurses’ views about pain and trauma at dressing changes: a central European perspective. Journal ofWound Care; 11: 2, 76-79.
Kiecolt-Glaser JK et al (1995) Slowing of wound healing by psychological stress. Lancet; 346: 1194-1196.
King B (2003) A review of research investigating pain and wound care. Journal of Wound Care; 12: 6, 219-223.
Melzack R (1995) The McGill Pain Questionnaire. Berkshire: NFER Nelson.
Melzack R, Wall P (1996) The Challenge of Pain. London: Penguin Science.
Price P et al (2008) Dressing-related pain in patients with chronic wounds: an international perspective. International Wound Journal; 5: 2, 159-171.
Sivamani RK et al (2009) Stress-mediated increases in systemic and local epinephrine impair skin wound healing: potential new indication for beta blockers. PLoS Medicine; 6: 1.
Solowiej K et al (2009) Review of the relationship between stress and wound healing: part 1. Journal of Wound Care; 18: 9, 357-366.
Speilberger CD (1968) State Trait Anxiety Inventory. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press Ltd.
Walburn J et al (2009) Psychological stress and wound healing in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research; 67: 253-271.
White R (2008) A multinational survey of the assessment of pain when removing dressings Wounds UK; 4: 1, 1-6.
World Union of Wound Healing Societies (2007) Principles of Best Practice: Minimising Pain at Dressing Related Procedures. A Consensus Document. Toronto: WoundPedia Inc.
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Berkshire: NFER Nelson.
Online training units, written and reviewed by experts. Earn two hours' CPD and a personalised certificate for your portfolio.
Subscribers get FREE unlimited access to all our online learning units and non-subscribers can access each learning unit for £10 + VAT.