Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Cameron announces patient rating system


Patients will be able to rate the treatment they receive in hospitals to ensure that people are treated with dignity and respect on wards, it will be announced today.

The simple “friends and family test” will ask whether patients would recommend their hospital to loved ones. The results will be published and hospital leaders who fail the test will be held to account.

Later today David Cameron will announce that the test will be rolled out across wards in England from April 2013.

The prime minister said the data will give patients a clear idea of where to get the best care.

The Nursing and Care Quality Forum, which was announced in January to address concerns about the way some patients are treated, wrote to Mr Cameron recommending the simple test.

The letter said: “It is critical that the NHS takes far greater notice of what people think about the quality of care they receive.

“An important way of doing this is asking people whether they would recommend the organisation where they have received care, should a loved one require treatment.

“We need to go further and faster with the friends and family test. We would like to see immediate roll out across the NHS with a view to developing a national measure as soon as practicable.”

The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) welcomed the new test.

RCN chief executive and general secretary Dr Peter Carter said: “We endorse the friends and family test of NHS services which is an important measure of how people perceive the care they are provided by their organisation.

“We look forward to contributing to this work as it develops and there must be a focus on acting on these results to ensure that continuous improvements are made.

“Giving nurses the time and resources to care - for example freeing them up to guarantee that they spend dedicated time with their patients and get the right administrative support - is crucial in ensuring confidence in care providers.”

The Forum also recommended that nurses are recruited for their caring nature and compassion as well as their knowledge and skills.

Dr Carter added: “We are pleased to have been part of this important Forum which recognises that the vast majority of nurses provide excellent care.

“We welcome the recommendations which will build on this and improve the ability of nurses, by giving them the right resources and skills, to provide dignified and compassionate care across the board.”


Readers' comments (29)

  • Tinkerbell

    who'd have thought but i totally agree with david cameron on this. It should have beed done a long time ago, but i hope the paperwork remains 'simple' and not just another piece of admin that takes away our time to be with the patient.

    Perhaps it could be done by the admin clerk who has no involvement in the patient care so that no one feels under any pressure and can feel free to give an honest opinion.

    Who would want to be nursed in a hospital that is getting bad reviews, who would want to eat in a restaurant with one?

    This will give some managers a chance to up their game and be accountable for what happens on the shop floor. If shabby care is being provided due to staff shortages i hope this will be reflected too and addressed, sadly i think some hospitals will be closed because they can't provide quality care and this would be sad if it is part of this governments agenda, when they should be doing it for the right reasons to promote better care for all across the country. It remains to be seen what comes out of it as far as failing hospitals are concerned.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hm, on the face of it this seems harmless enough but I wonder if it is the best use of resources (money) that could be better spent elsewhere. Cameron makes a great deal of `choice` but the reality for most people is they have limited choice when it comes to which hospital they go to.
    I hope this information is used to inform fully about the reasons for less favourable outcomes and used to provide more resources where needed not just to bash hard-pressed frontline staff with - I have my doubts though.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I remember the 'Patients Charter'. Just a stick to beat nurses with. It never improved anything, just gave people the right to get nasty. Be careful what you endorse, it might seem good on the surface, but may have hidden depths.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Patients have been giving 'feed back' about their hospitalisation experience for many years, and the outcome of that is..... what we see, and expect in hospitals today!

    Sadly, Cameron, as his predecessors, keep dishing out all these piles of questionnaires for us, and NHS staff to complete, but nothing ever beneficial happens as a result. It's just another 'paperwork' exercise.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • as has already been said there are already patient satisfaction cards available. This is all about a patients perception of care which differs from person to person and how can you recommend a hospital when you might of only stayed in for one night after a minor op.

    What will happen if one patient is offered a specific treatment, tells their friend about it and their friend is refused for very good reasons?

    You do often hear relatives say 'don't go to such and such a hospital, my gran died there'. Perhaps gran would have died anyway wherever she was but that has already made that hospital sound bad.

    When they roll out this scheme I hope they will ask patients and relatives for their suggestions how things can be done differently.

    What I find disrespectful is that everyone seems very keen to hear what patients and relatives think of the NHS but don't give a damn about what the staff think.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I don't know if it is fair to compare a hospital to a restaurant rating.

    One patient may come in, sail through their treatment and everything is fab. Their 'loved one' may come to the same ward which then has an outbreak of noro, the op is postponed, the patient next door is confused and gets into other peoples bed and it's a very negative experience.

    Some things are completely out of our control, as is staffing and staff sickness. Will this be taken into account?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Exactly Anonymous | 25-May-2012 3:09 pm

    Instead of giving questionnaires to patients give them to front line staff, listen to what is being said and act on it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • anon 8.06.

    Patients are important but so are the staff (who are very often patients, people seems to forget that).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Perhaps staff can fill out a form when a patient is particularly obnoxious.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Already been there and done that!

    Hopefully this will work better than the American Management fad 'Customer is King' and patient feed- back questionnaire in the 1990s with glossy brochures explaining this to patients all the great services they could expect during their hospital stay, as well as printing on paper table napkins alongside a new hospital logo a picture of a particularly handsome and attractive frog with a golden and jewel-studded crown on its head!

    the hospital direction only passed back to us the complaints and never the compliments which they may also have received on occasion! This impacted negatively on the morale of our team. Fortunately we had plenty of positive oral reports from our patients who were highly satisfied with our care to keep us going and stimulate us to provide the best possible level of care and service. it could be that it was mainly those who had complaints who sent back the questionnaires in the first place. Some were justified and led to improvements but unfortunately the worst one, accompanied by a threat of legal action, was from a patient with complex mental health problems on our acute medical ward for whom we had limited specialist skills and resources but gave her as much extra time as our other work would allow and did our best to accommodate her psychological needs and very difficult behaviour, which included splitting, in addition to treating her medical diagnosis. The only mh support was one visit from a psychiatrist to look at her notes and check her medication and a very brief talk with her. Fortunately we had the support of a good hospital lawyer but it necessitated numerous meetings where management were less than supportive to our cause and the exchange of copious correspondence
    and gathering of information from each member of the team over a long period which took a considerable amount of time away from the care of our other patients.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page20 per page50 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs