Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

CQC chief Cynthia Bower resigns


The chief executive of the Care Quality Commission, Cynthia Bower, has resigned.

She has announced her resignation on the same day the Department of Health has published the findings of its “performance and capability review” of the regulator.

The review found the CQC had made “considerable achievements” since it was established in 2009.

But it said the challenge of registering more than 21,000 providers had been “underestimated”  by the CQC and the DH, and more could have done more to manage risks during the early years of the organisation’s operation.

The review also said the role of the CQC has “not been as clear as it needs to be to health and care providers, patients and the public”.

Ms Bower will remain in post until autumn 2012. The recruitment process for her successor will begin shortly.

In a statement, she said:  “After almost four years leading CQC, I feel that it is now time to move on. The process of setting up an entirely new system of regulation has been intensely challenging - but we have accomplished an enormous amount. We have merged three organisations, registered 40,000 provider locations and brought virtually the entire health and social care network under one set of standards, which focus on the needs of people who use services.

“I am pleased that the Department of Health performance and capability review, published today, recognises the scale of what has been achieved - and in particular the significant improvements made over the last nine months. I’m confident that CQC will continue to build on the progress already made, delivering  increasing benefits to people who use services by shining a light on poor care - and I am proud to have played a part in this.”

CQC chair Jo Williams said: “I am very sorry that Cynthia has decided to move on, but I understand her desire to take on new challenges. I would like to take this opportunity to thank her for the enormous contribution she has made to the setting up and running of CQC.

“She has shown tireless commitment to this organisation, and she leaves it in a strong position to carry out our essential role in tackling poor care. This is confirmed by today’s performance review from the Department of Health, which recognises CQC’s ‘considerable achievements’ in setting the essential platform from which tougher regulatory action can be taken,” she added.

NHS chief executive Sir David Nicholson said: “I would like to thank Cynthia for her commitment as CQC chief executive. Building a new regulator involves great vision, leadership and resilience. This is always a complex task and one under constant scrutiny.  It is great credit to Cynthia’s leadership to have achieved this.”

DH permanent secretary Una O’Brien, who has been carrying out the review, said: “”Cynthia has provided energetic leadership to the CQC from its very outset.  Over her four years as chief executive, CQC has introduced - for the first time - a new model of regulation for health and social care.  Cynthia is a committed public servant and I wish her well for the future.”


Readers' comments (34)

  • Tinkerbell

    i too am pleased that cynthia has decided to move on and meet new 'challenges' as the challenge of this one certainly was not met and remains to be met. Lots of talk and very little action even when grave concerns were brought to CQC they didn't respond in a timely manner, if at all. Maybe it is only journalists who can do the job in undercover roles.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I dont think the CQC does very much - cold calling inspections in every hospital and every home would certainly show the appauling elderly care in both establishments to be exactly what it is, non caring and get them out of beds ASAP especially in the Acute settings. CQC get your finger out and bring back care not a cattle market way of thinking.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I seem to recall reading that the CQC has been accused of 'bullying its own senior staff' - it probably needs new people at the top.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ronald Luton-Brown

    still heavily over regulated and no bite when needed!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I undertake clinical negligence work and comment on nursing and care for the Police and Coroners.
    On several occasions it has been clear that CQC were not identifying very poor care. The lack of inspection and the naive expectation that the home owner will fill in information about care standards accurately when their livliohood depends on it beggars belief.
    I contacted the CQC to offer some feed back for them on a few particularly grizzly cases where I and others had been very critical of the CQC.
    The first person I spoke to thought that was positive and would promote the "learning organisation approach", I was invited to write in.
    My letter was given to HR who wrote to me, getting my name wrong, and saying that if I wanted a job to apply in the usual way!
    I do hope that a new person will not continue to stifle the organisation and actively promote integrity and transparency into the regulation system which is failing so many vulnerable people.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ms B moves on!
    Leaving the rest of her organisation to continue to muddle on.
    The proposed quality assessment programme shelved.
    No progress plan in place for taking the organisation forward. Still needs to complete what it started in 2010 is this a good reference for her next job?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • there seem to be a lot of resignations from those in high places recently all around the world! it would be better maybe if they used their experience to improve rather than leaving their sinking ships. it seems to be an admission that they were wrong or not doing a satisfactory job.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This woman was comprehensively "outed" by
    the Francis enquiry into the disgraceful
    events which occurred at the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust.
    Serious doubts were expressed about her suitability for the post at the CQC.

    This is just another example of how "failure" brings substantial reward if you are a senior NHS manager. The practise of recycling these people is a disgrace but lets be thankful that on this occasion a resignation has occurred. However, let us not be surprised if it turns out that a substantial sum of money was offered to secure the departure Ms Bower

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • On the topic of bonuses! Could we not suggest that the bonuses and golden handshakes currently awarded for failure to departing senior mgt, be given to the NHSLA for the additional costs of litigation that arise from their perpetuation and promotion of low standards of care.Also what about those in receipt of large payouts who get a job the following month. Should that money also be retrieved?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Long over due. a fish rots from its head down. The CQC has long been fed what they want to hear when they do inspection, they are then taken and show the areas that has been sanitised. The moral of the tale for the CQC to be effective do unannounced inspection and you pick your cohort or sample areas do not be led like a lamb to the slaughter by the organisations you are inspecting.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page20 per page50 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs