- Article: Caie J (2011) Where does mental health nursing fit in primary care? Nursing Times; 107: 45, 24-25.
- Author: Jude Caie is mental health nurse therapist, Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust, HMP Manchester, Manchester.
Follow the debate on Twitter #NTjournalclub
Key points
- The remit of Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) is to provide timely and time-limited therapy
- New roles in the IAPT framework mean nurses can access new training
- Becoming part of the IAPT structure could give mental health nurses the opportunity to have their skills formally recognised
- It is up to individual mental health nurses to decide whether they can work within an IAPT model
- Nursing must fight to survive and establish its place within a changing healthcare environment
Let’s discuss
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) aims to reduce the state’s welfare bill by increasing the number of people returning to work after suffering common mental health problems such as depression and anxiety. The initiative has raised some fundamental questions for mental health nurses:
- With 10,000 new paraprofessionals working their way through waiting lists, is there still room for mental health nurses in primary care, or have they been sidelined?
- Is mental health nursing still a separate profession, with specialist skills and knowledge but with few clearly defined nursing roles left?
- Should mental health nurses develop into “psychological wellbeing practitioners”, “gateway workers” or “high-intensity therapists”?
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment.

From Putting it into practice
How do we put research into practice in the surgery or the hospital ward? Each week we’ll pick out a practice article and pose some topics for debate and you can pose your own questions too …Follow the weekly debates on twitter with #NTjournalclub


'Lansley must listen to nurses on the front line'





Readers' comments (3)
Anonymous | 14-Nov-2011 8:20 am
IAPT their wiating listsa are already long and so we get clients referred to us as we have to at least make contact see them within 14 days of referral.
Unsuitable or offensive?
Anonymous | 14-Nov-2011 3:18 pm
When Lansley see's that he get a Nurse practitioner to do the same job as a psychologist doing CBT for a lot less money what do you think he will do - its the cheap and cheerful Tory way.
Unsuitable or offensive?
John Spashett | 28-Nov-2011 9:15 am
As a past service user who had to put up with extremely long waiting times whilst in a desperate psychological state I would have to say that any steps that can bring assessment and meaningful treatment closer would have to be welcome. That being said I would want all treatment offerings, regardless of the supplier, to be assessed for effectiveness of outcome and non-performing programmes modified or even stopped.
Unsuitable or offensive?