By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Gastric tube insertion length method 'inaccurate', say researchers

The nose-ear-xiphoid (NEX) method for predicting gastric tube insertion length in children should be phased out, according to US researchers from Indiana University’s school of nursing.

They compared three methods: NEX, nose-ear-mid-umbilicus (NEMU), and age-related, height-based (ARHB) in 276 children who were randomly assigned to one of the three.

ARHB and NEMU were found to be significantly more accurate than NEX.

Writing in the Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, the authors said: “NEX should no longer be used as a gastric tube insertion-length predictor.”

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!