Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Invest in boosting district nurse numbers, says QNI chief


The decline in the size of the district nursing workforce must be halted urgently in order for community services to develop, the head of the Queen’s Nursing Institute has warned. 

Speaking at the institute’s annual conference in London this week, QNI chief executive Crystal Oldman said: “We urgently need more district nurses.

“There are simply insufficient numbers of district nurses to provide the care needed.”

She highlighted that 90% of all clinical interactions now took place in community settings and the NHS was facing a “tsunami of long term conditions”.  

Ms Oldman cited a QNI report, published in June, that revealed “widespread and significant concerns” over the number of new district nurses being educated.

She called for a “master plan and commitment” to enable the “excellent work” already being done by community nurses to “continue to grow and develop”. “Part of that master plan includes investment into the education of our community specialist practitioners,” she told delegates.

Ms Oldman added that the QNI was “delighted” to have been involved in drawing up the Department of Health’s district nursing strategy, which was published in January. But she said the strategy – A new vision and service model for district nursing – must be backed with investment.

She said local NHS and education commissioners must work together to fund the nursing teams required to “deliver the care that patients, their families and carers want outside of hospital”.

“Let’s not forget that district nursing is a specialist area of practice…it’s not CPD that can be acquired along the way by taking a few modules and study days,” she warned.

A National Nursing Research Unit report also highlighted similar concerns this week and called for more “robust mechanisms for workforce planning”.

It questioned whether the district nurse workforce was “sufficient, in terms of overall numbers and skill mix”, highlighting the number being trained was exceeded by the number leaving and retiring.

The report cited official data showing the number of district nurses had fallen by 44% between 1999 and 2012, down from 11,500 to 6,400.

It also revealed that the balance between staff groups providing care in the community had shifted. In 2005, district nurses accounted for 20% of NHS staff recorded in the community, but this had fallen to 12% by 2012.

Ms Oldman also used her speech to call for the term “acute care” to be replaced by “hospital-based care”, in order to get away from the myth that community-based care was less complex.

“Nurses talk about working in the acute sector or the community sector,” she said. “There is something fundamentally wrong about this.”

“We’re comparing apples and oranges,” she said, noting that acute described the state of a patient’s health needs while community referred to the environment where the patient was looked after.

“We need to rethink out terminology, because it perpetuates the view that hospital-based care demands a higher level of skill and community-based care demands a lower level of nursing…which couldn’t be further from the reality,” she added.

Are you able to Speak Out Safely? Sign our petition to put pressure on your trust to support an open and transparent NHS.


Readers' comments (14)

  • michael stone

    More community care - which is 'the plan' (if 'plan' can be applied to the recent NHS changes).- surely requires more DNs: this is surely obvious (and not news to everyone except the people controlling the money).

    By the way, did anyone notice that Nicholson explained in yesterday's Independent (page 2) that the NHS competition rules are getting in the way of good patient care ? I seem to remember somebody govermental - perhaps Hunt - explaining that Nicholson had a better understanding of how the NHS functions as a whole, than anybody else in the country: I suppose Hunt or whoever it was will now retract that opinion !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • can we also add in the Community Childrens Nursing teams in to the equation as these services suffer the same pressures with less funding/staff but have an increasing level of complexity to deal with .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Part of the problem of recruiting hospital nurses into the community is that the NHS pension is not portable, and people will have to freeze it and start a new one with an alternative provider that the community care groups have chosen, which isn't as favourable, or have their own private one. Any nurse that already has a good amount of years in does not want to swap to a less favourable pension scheme. A local HR staff member has admitted to me that is part of the problem. They need to sort it out if they want experienced nurses to care for people in the community.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 27-Sep-2013 2:33 pm

    that's ridiculous. isn't community nursing part of the NHS?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 27-Sep-2013 2:33 pm

    "NHS pension is not portable"

    That's a new one on me and isn't true for us in the community in Scotland. I can move around the NHS and my pension moves with me. Is that a regional issue? Or are they trying to pull the wool over your eyes?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have been saying for ages that more community nurses are needed,due to the fact that more and more people are being treated at home and people who are more acutely ill. My role as a community nurse has changed considerably in the past five years. I have also worked in a/e so I know what acute nursing is. The role of the community nurse is expanding and more complex but as nurses retire or leave they are not being replaced. This needs to be addressed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tinkerbell

    I moved from ward nursing to the community last year, I sure hope my pension moved with me.

    this government is dismantling what was the nhs, they don't want public sector workers, they don' like it, and like every other public sector want it privatised, only they have taken a step too far with what was our nhs. It is now so fragmented and disorganised nobody knows what's happening in this re-disorganisation, not even nicholson it seems who along with the tories and lansley created this monstrous mess that is wasting millions if not billions of OUR money.

    They are programmed to destroy it, job nearly done!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Portability of pensions all depends on whether your community provider is still part of the NHS. The govt did something called Transforming Community Services a couple of years ago, which slipped under the radar. Basically all the things like district nursing had to split from the PCT and could choose it's organisational form. Some stayed with the NHS, others formed social enterprises or got took over by Virgin or Serco, so no, NHS pensions didn't move across. Staff were shafted by stealth and lo and behold, recruitment is now a problem, because no one wants to work for reduced Ts and Cs that they've built up over years of service.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    tinkerbell | 27-Sep-2013 8:57 pm

    Tink, what the Independent told us about Sir David Nicholson (extracted) was:

    At an event hosted by the Health Service Journal, Sir David spoke candidly about the rules, which have already stood in the way of mergers and service changes that NHS managers and clinicians said were urgently needed. His comments were made under so-called Chatham House rules, which meant they could not be reported, but he later gave special permission for them to be published.

    "All of [the politicians who drew up the Health and Social Care Act] wanted competition as a tool to improve quality for patients," he said. "That's what they intended to happen, and we haven't got that...

    "I've been somewhere [where] a trust has used competition law to protect themselves from having to stop doing cancer surgery, even though they don't meet any of the guidelines [to carry such surgery out]," he continued.
    "Trusts have said to me they have organised, they have been through a consultation, they were centralising a particular service and they have been stopped by competition law. And I've heard a federated group of general practices have been stopped from coming together because of the threat of competition law. All of these [proposed changes] make perfect sense from the point of view of quality for patients, yet that is what has happened." He said that the law may have to change and that Jeremy Hunt, the Health Secretary, would have to act "quite quickly" to make possible "the big changes needed".

    The Department of Health said proposed NHS mergers had been considered by the Office of Fair Trading on only two occasions and that Mr Hunt was "absolutely clear that patient safety must always trump any competition concerns".

    I’ve a suspicion that you will suggest that at least someone in there, is speaking with forked tongue ?

    It is also nice that nobody could accuse the Daily Maul of inconsistency. There is a piece in the Review section of The Times today by Jeremy Paxman about WW1, and he tells us ‘… with Northcliffe sounding off about the country’s “two million superfluous women”. The Daily Mail proposed they be exported, rather than stay in Britain taking men’s jobs and inciting adultery and lesbianism’.

    By the way Tink, if you did tell me whether my ‘style’ was better at the link below, I didn’t catch it:

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tinkerbell

    michael stone | 28-Sep-2013 1:37 pm

    thanks for the nicholson explanation but quite frankly to me it all sounds like blah, blah, blah. Perhaps I am too simple to understand what it all means as cannot make head nor tail of it's waffle. There has been no action from all the waffle to improve what has turned the nhs into even more of a bureaucratic nightmare than it was before. These politicians have a lot of blood on their hands and their continual bleating about how they 'intend' to improve things is a long time coming. Frontline staff are basically rearranging the deck chair on the titanic.

    I can feel swear words coming on so I will stop short just to say if they really cared then they would stop all this nonsense and re-integrate health and social care and stop all the unnecessary zombie tick box mentality as of now. They have caused the nhs to go into meltdown so why should any of us believe another word they say, not so much speaking with fork tongue as lying bastards. The nhs has been turned into one complicated faff. It is only the frontline staff who are providing/producing anything of any worth despite being on the ropes. So as far as i'm concerned nicholson and his like can all fark off.

    Yes I did comment on your link previously, it was much more succinct and to the point.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page20 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs