Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Woman wins court bid to have gastric bypass


A mother of three is believed to have become the first person in the country to use a judicial review to force the NHS to give her a gastric bypass so she can lose weight, her solicitor has said.

Hazel Kent sought a judicial review, which often involves human rights issues and planning decisions, after she was refused the operation by her local PCT.

The 40 year old was denied the treatment despite her weight reaching nearly 16 stone.

The divorcee had already paid for one operation in September 2001 and saw her weight drop from 17 and a half stone to 10 stone, making her a size 12.

But two and a half years later the gastric band came loose and had to be removed to prevent Mrs Kent, of Bracknell, Berkshire, contracting blood poisoning.

Despite being given appetite-suppressing drugs, Mrs Kent’s weight increased after the gastric band was removed.

However, East Berkshire PCT refused to pay for a second, more permanent, gastric bypass, which cost between £8,000 and £15,000 each time.

She launched her own fight for the PCT to reverse its decision but when this failed Mrs Kent employed McCool Patterson Hemsi solicitors to take her claim to the High Court.

Mrs Kent has now won her battle after the PCT decided not to contest the judicial review in the High Court and fund her treatment.

She hopes to have the surgery by Christmas.

Mrs Kent’s solicitor, Oliver Wright, said: “I believe this is the first time a judicial review has been used for someone seeking a gastric bypass. There is no other recorded case of it.

“This operation is going to make Mrs Kent go back down to a size 12 and so she is not going to get heart disease, type 2 diabetes and all those things she will get if she continues as she is and which will all cost the NHS a fortune.

“The problem is that PCTs work on a yearly budget so they see the cost of such operations as £8,000 this year but they don’t see how much they could save in future years.”

Read more

Are you fat? Or just a victim of society? 


Readers' comments (17)

  • Well how interesting. Must have been a very good solicitor! I just wonder when people will take responsability for there own actions, we are very fortunate to have the nhs in this country but go to other countries and you have to pay for basics like plasters, dressings anything which has been needed. I think it would make our country alot less wasteful if they had to pay for this, and would make them think twice about having treatment. Why not offer someone a years free membership in a gym, then if they have lost some weight at the end of the year give them another free year and so on? at least then they are also helping themself, and im sure this wouldnt cost as much.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yep, its great that you can just sue the PCT to get the operation to lose weight!! Why dont she just try eating less! this is a magic wand which she doesnt have to pay for!! especially when we have a cash strapped NHS! Those solicitors are laughing all the way to the bank! when will people take responsibilty for their well being? this woman should eat a healthy balanced diet, cut her portion size, and exercise everday for 40 minutes together with some weight reducing tablets. I am so angry that people like her use the law to sue the NHS just because she cannot control what she puts in her mouth!I am a health professional and am fed up with people thinking that we have a magic wand for all their problems!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So this means she wont get heart disease or type II diabetes ? Well Mr Oliver Wright I hope she doesn't sue you in the future when you cannot promise this!

    I agree with the sentiments of the other posters and people taking responsibility for their own actions, but unfortunately the situation is just going to get worse!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There is a simple exercise for losing weight .............
    Shake your head from side to side ..................... everytime you are offered food.
    Obesity is self harm not a medical condition. How many Obese people are claiming DLA Mobility Component because their weight stops them being mobile ? It's scandalous that this woman has successfully sued the NHS for theatre time that a more deserving person, suffering from a genuine illness, could have,

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As an obese healthcare professional, awaiting consultation at our nearest banding centre, I monitor carefully what I eat and have followed a slimming club plan exactly, no cheating, for 6months, watching colleagues alongside me lose stones while my weight goes up on exactly same food, I object to some of the statements made. I swim at least once a week and walk regularly and yes I am aware of the health risks as dad is diabetic. Gym is offered locally but is only good if you do not work as it is at off-peak times, no good if you work 9 - 5, so my point is do not tar everyone with the same it's your own fault brush, some people really have issues.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sue, maybe, but those who do have serious medical issues causing weight problems are in the absolute minority. The majority are simply obese through a lifestyle choice. And the other posters have it right, when the hell are people going to start taking responsibility for their own actions?

    Very little real information is given about this case, but can't the question be asked WHY this womans weight ballooned again after the GB was removed and appetite supressants were prescribed? Was it simply due to the fact that she ate too much regardless of the supressants and did absolutely no excercise? My own suspicion says that would be the case.

    A more dangerous point to this story though, there is precedent now for trusts to be sued if individuals do not like the clinical judgements they are given. Regardless of little things like medical expertise or opinion, if you want something, you simply sue to get it. Absolutely despicable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sue is right a few , very few people have issues with losing weight. The majority I am afraid is due to lack of excercise too much food. It not just about healthy eating, it is about porton control. Eat healthy but have lots of it you will gain weight. We are very fortunate to have an NHS to sue if we don't get what we want. How lucky we are. My mother desperately needed a knee replace but was told if you cannot pay for it you will end up in a wheel chair she was only 65years old. I paid for the knee replacement. Why could'nt this woman family do the same. I am afraid we live in a society where if we cannot have what we want, lets sue them take them to court. People must learn to take control and look after their health. They look after their house and car far better than their own health. But expect the NHS to fix it for them when it all goes wrong. What would she have done if we had no NHS. If she was in the same country like my mom she would have been told to fund it her self.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Drinkers a couple of weeks ago, salad dodgers this week, I look forward to hapless RTA victims being subjected to the flaming torch and pitchfork mob shortly.....But seriously, if the PCT had a sound case they should have stuck to their guns with the legal case. This creates a dangerous precedent that will undoubtedly cause problems in the future. My understanding is that it is very possible for gastric band users to put weight on post-op and as this individual clearly didn't put weight on at that point, she was a valid case for repeat surgery. Anyway, who is to say that the band has not failed because of poor surgery or faulty materials? We can speculate all day about this - and despite our overstretched teams and workloads probably will - but at the end of the day its hardly massive news. Now where's that pork pie I put down around here...........

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Phil Dup

    Its a shame our rich lazy gutless Society has lost sight of some basic fundamental laws of science.

    ie: The First Law of Thermodynamics =
    Energy can be neither created nor destroyed. It can only change forms.

    In other words anyone can eat AS MUCH as they want and wont put any weight on if they undertake enough activity to use MORE energy than they have consumed.

    4000 calories of food per day + 4001 calories of energy used = weightloss.

    4000 calories of food a day + 3999 calories of energy used = weightgain.

    4000 calories of food a day + 4000 calories of energy used = happiness.

    And no need to use cliched time consuming expensive methods of exercise such as Gyms - the whole damned world around us is a vast free gym!
    I've seen idiots using Lifts instead of stairs to go up to Gyms in high buildings - then in the Gym they 'powerwalk' on inclined walking machines !!! Aaaaghhh!!!

    I despair sometimes but I suppose we end up with the Gene Pool we deserve really.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I cannot believe this story?? Has this dear woman not heard of excercise and not eating over the required calories for the amount of calories burned? Simple?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page20 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.