By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Fear of vaccinations 'linked to weak knowledge'

People who have poor general knowledge about science are more likely to be fearful of getting vaccinations for themselves or their children, a poll has suggested.

Those with a weaker knowledge about science are more likely to think the risk of serious side effects from immunisations are “high”, according to a Wellcome Trust survey.

While 4% of adults who scored highly on a science quiz thought the risk of serious side effects was high, this rose to 22% of adults who had achieved low scores.

But the survey, conducted on 1,300 UK adults, found that almost four in every five people regarded vaccinations as “safe”.

The news comes amid the outbreak of measles in South Wales.

This epidemic has been linked to low uptake of the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) jab.

In 1998, now discredited research linked the vaccination to autism in children.

The study caused a global scare and uptake levels of the vaccination fell significantly in the years after its publication.

“The recent outbreak of measles in Wales, fuelled by lingering, but misplaced, fears over the MMR vaccine, demonstrates how challenging it can be to shake off people’s fears about vaccination,” Clare Matterson, director of medical humanities and engagement at the Wellcome Trust, said.

“This survey suggests that such fears are related to weaker science knowledge and demonstrates the importance of a solid science education.”

Readers' comments (5)

  • Well yes that seems obvious to me. After all the anti vax brigade always quote what they consider to be "scientific studies" but of course they turn out to be nothing of the sort.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • michael stone

    I had expected the 'anti vax brigade' to have leapt in on this one by now - I'm surprised they haven't.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Actually, the CDC conducted a study on this very subject. Instead of conducting a poll, they actually surveyed 200 people and found that those who were against vaccines (defined here as "in fear of" instead of the more accurate "informed about") had larger circles of friends, read more books and researched much more than those who the CDC labelled as "conformists".

    So I suppose that in the minds of some, quoting the CDC may in this case be a "scientific study which is nothing of the sort".

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Please let me stand corrected as the study was conducted by the AAP for Pediatrics. Here is the link.

    http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2013/04/10/peds.2012-2452.abstract

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • What Wales epidemic?
    if you wish to discuss weak knowledge of science and medical jargon as opposed to strong knowledge of medical 'science'. Please discuss the 'reported' cases as opposed to the 'confirmed' cases and please use the terms efficacy and effectiveness in your response.
    www2.nphs.wales.nhs.uk:8080/CommunitySurveillanceDocs.nsf/%28$All%29/E26DD2EEC96007F180257B64005807A5/$File/monthly%20lab%202013May.pdf?OpenElement

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

newsletterpromo