By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Essex trust suspends employee over cancer data probe

Colchester Hospital University Foundation Trust has begun a disciplinary investigation and suspended a member of staff in relation to alleged wrongful manipulation of cancer patients’ waiting time data.

The move, on 12 June, follows whistleblowers reporting allegations of “bullying and harassment and the alleged manipulation of endoscopy and dermatology waiting lists”, which has been highlighted in an independent report.

A trust statement said: “Having considered the report carefully the trust has now initiated a disciplinary investigation and yesterday a member of staff was suspended pending the outcome of this disciplinary process.

“The report does not reach any firm conclusions about the allegations but it recommends that the trust consider whether it should begin disciplinary proceedings against any member of staff.”

Interim trust chief executive Lucy Moore said in a statement: “It would be wrong to prejudge the outcome of the disciplinary process but it is important to stress that nothing is more important to us than the safety and wellbeing of those we care for.

Colchester

Lucy Moore

“We will now conduct a wider review and we will be open and transparent as we proceed taking all necessary steps to ensure ongoing patient safety,” she added.

The hospital said it took the action after receiving the independent report into serious concerns two weeks ago.

The news follows a Care Quality Commission report into the trust, published last November, which said there were “inaccuracies” in waiting time data relating to cancer treatment.

Staff told inspectors they were “pressured or bullied” to change data to make it seem as though people were being treated in line with national guidelines, the report said.

Meanwhile, in what is understood to be a separate development, the trust has also called in the police to investigate allegations of drug tampering at the hospital.

An Essex police spokeswoman said she was unable to comment on the drug tampering investigation.

Readers' comments (4)

  • Would it not be more exceptable for the hospital to say we can't cope we have too many Patients and we need help, insted they lie and cheat their figures and put peoples lives at risk, who is held accountable for these failings. I thought the NHS was their to help people not give you a death sentence. I think the last labour goverment have a lot to answer for.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Caroline Fanneran | 13-Jun-2014 3:34 pm

    the problem is they don't appear to perceive it as wrong or stop to reflect on the serious consequences.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • I suspect this is happening in hospitals up and down the Country.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • "Meanwhile, in what is understood to be a separate development ..." has no place in this story- two separate and very different issues are being conflated here with arguably nefarious intent.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

newsletterpromo