Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Exclusive: 'Francis effect' leads to thousands more nursing posts


Hospitals are trying to increase the number of nurses and healthcare assistants working on their wards in a trend being attributed to a growing focus on patient safety in the wake of the Francis report.

An investigation by Nursing Times found a significant majority of NHS trusts have increased the numbers of nurses and HCAs they are prepared to employ – known as the funded establishment – despite the unprecedented financial strain on the health service.

In total, 102 NHS trusts responded to a freedom of information request asking for information about the funded establishment over recent years.

Of these, 73 had allocated more money to employing nurses in 2012-13 compared with the previous financial year. In addition,

59 hospitals increased the number of healthcare assistants in 2012-13 compared with the previous year.

Across the sample, this resulted in the creation of an extra 4,321 full-time equivalent nurse and 740 HCA roles. This is equivalent to a 2.6% and 1.3% increase in the size of the funded workforce respectively since 2011-12.

The rise in funded establishment posts represents only the financial commitment to employ nurses and HCAs, meaning the true number of staff working on the wards will be lower, depending on each trust’s vacancy level and its ability to recruit nurses.

The fluctuation in funded posts will also be affected by trusts gaining or losing services, and the opening or closing of acute facilities.

Professor Jim Buchan, from the School of Health Sciences at Edinburgh’s Queen Margaret University said: “What we are seeing is the effect of a definite post-Francis factor and trusts recognising issues of safe staffing and patient safety are much higher on the agenda.”

The Francis report into care failings at Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust found insufficient nurses and a low skill mix were behind much of the poor care received by patients at the West Midlands trust. The trust had cut nurse posts in a bid to meet its financial targets and achieve foundation trust status.

Royal College of Nursing policy director Howard Catton said trusts had been focused on hitting savings targets and reducing staff “for years”

but “the ‘Francis effect’ brought the quality and safety component of doing that into sharp focus”.

He added: “That has not only forced many trusts to row back on those plans but also made some recruit more nurses. But, when they go out to the market, they find there isn’t the pool of nurses they thought.”

In the first part of our special investigation last week, Nursing Times reported one third of hospital trusts in England had already been forced to recruit nurses from abroad to fill vacancies.

John Adler, chief executive of University Hospitals of Leicester Trust, told Nursing Times his trust had 500 vacancies to fill after increasing the nursing budget by £5.3m.

He said: “What Francis has done is make people very aware that you can’t provide high-quality care on wards without a sufficient number of nurses – [but] creating the jobs is one thing, finding the people is another.”

Latest figures from the Health and Social Care Information Centre show the number of FTE nurses actually working in the NHS has fallen by 3,000 since 2010.

Twenty-nine hospitals out of the total of 102 reduced their numbers of nurses and HCAs over the past year (see box). University Hospitals Bristol Foundation Trust had one of the largest falls, as did United Lincolnshire Hospitals Trust.

Helen Morgan, acting chief nurse at University Hospitals Bristol, said the trust had closed just under 70 acute beds since March 2010 and had reviewed its workforce skill mix, shift patterns and ways of working.

She said she was confident the current nursing establishment was appropriate and met the Safe Staffing Alliance minimum of one RN per eight patients.

United Lincolnshire, which has been heavily criticised this year by the Care Quality Commission for its standards of care, has promised to invest £4m in extra nurses; 165 have joined the trust since April and more European recruitment is planned.

Sally Brearley, chair of the Nursing and Care Quality Forum, said the post-Francis focus on staffing levels was positive but warned it did not mean “the staff are actually in post”. She added: “Patient safety is about having enough staff on the front line. The rest is meaningless without that.”

A spokesman for Health Education England said: “HEE is planning commissions that will produce new nurses in 2017. However, there is much that trusts can do now, such as looking at “return to work” courses and focusing on retaining and retraining their current staff.”


Readers' comments (21)

  • Excellent news, and encouraging.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • it is good that the Francis now appears to be heeded and hopefully in future when nurses speak out they will be too

    visual image of the situation :-?

    nurses on the wards will soon all be tripping over each others' feet and twiddling their thumbs - there will be so many they and their patients won't know what has hit them

    the mountains of paperwork will melt under the weight

    and all we need now is for managers to bend over backwards to accommodate their ever desire such as adequate resources for them to do their job, listening to them when they give an opinion or get out their whistles and blow on them, (they may need a supply of ear plugs to dampen the noise) and see to it that their working conditions and pay is well provided for.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hmm. It took patient deaths on a horrific and shameful scale (whilst many nurses stood by and did nothing) and the action of their families and friends to gain public enquiries (whilst many nurses stood by and did nothing).

    What has not changed here is the behaviour of nurses. They still stand by and do nothing. Many wouldn't know what the hell you were talking about if you mentioned the Francis Report. The increase in staffing will be temporary and will be reversed when the cost becomes prohibitive. And nurses will stand by and do nothing. I guarantee it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    Anonymous | 20-Oct-2013 12:39 pm

    'Many [nurses]wouldn't know what the hell you were talking about if you mentioned the Francis Report'

    If that is true, it is shameful [for the nursing profession].

    We must ask how these extra nurses are being funded (is money being used now from the budgets of future years ?) and will this apparent concern about staffing numbers persist once Francis is a less fresh memory ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone | 20-Oct-2013 12:53 pm

    there are quite a number out there who aren't overly bright or worldly wise! some seem to live in their own little virtual worlds.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Barts Health is proposing the opposite with a reduction in headcount and skill mix and yet are going ahead anyway. It makes me laugh how these 'chief nurses' get rolled out to justify the Trusts positions. I'm not sure who these corporate nurses are meant to represent but it sure isn't nursing, patients or carers.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I don't know where you all work, but there's certainly no extra qualified staff on the cards where I work, indeed, the opposite is true.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think most nurses, and other health professionals, and the public are aware of the Francis Report. The increase in staff is more than welcome, but as a cynic, I suspect once a position is vacated, it won't be replaced and we will be back at square one.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 20-Oct-2013 11:52 pm

    "I think most nurses, and other health professionals, and the public are aware of the Francis Report."

    Really? I did a crude poll at work the other day. Out of 21 nurses asked, 4 knew about the Francis Report. The rest hadn't a clue. Someone thought it was to do with missing children!

    I don't know about AHPs or the public, but the next day as I was chatting to some two of my neighbours, I did ask them if they knew what the Francis Report was. They didn't. Explanation from me didn't cause any bells to ring.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And who will take the credit for the extra staffing?

    I can hear it now. " We have more nurses in the NHS than under previous government, that demonstrates our commitment to providing a first class NHS"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page20 per page50 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs