Exclusive: senior nurses who warned 111 service was unsafe were ignored
Senior nurses at NHS Direct warned colleagues and commissioners it was not safe to go live with the new 111 service in the West Midlands, but were over-ruled, Nursing Times has learnt.
A series of emails seen by Nursing Times reveal the views of senior figures at NHS Direct and NHS England involved in the decision to press ahead with the launch of the non-emergency phone service in the West Midlands area in March, which had been delayed since February.
They record NHS Direct director of nursing Tricia Hamilton saying the service was unsafe due to the high rate of predicted abandoned calls, and NHS Direct regional director for the West Midlands Pam Bradbury, a nurse by background, telling colleagues she was “very uncomfortable reassuring commissioners that we have the staffing levels right”.
The service was subsequently pulled in some parts of the region days after the launch on 19 March, as staff were unable to cope with demand.
In one of the emails, director of operational support Sean Flynn recollected the conference call during which the decision was taken to go live. He said: “Tricia Hamilton said something like: looking at the figures she thought it unsafe.
“[But director of strategy and business development Ruth Rankine] reminded her of the position we had created by not going live on time… Eventually a decision was made that we would go live.”
NHS England’s NHS 111 project director in the West Midlands, Wayne Bartlett, also took part in the phone discussion.
An NHS England spokeswoman said the decision to go live was taken “after very careful consideration of the balance of risk in the urgent care system across the region”. For example, she noted a planned reduction in call handlers at GP out-of-hours services was already underway even though 111’s launch had been delayed.
A spokeswoman for NHS Direct said: “The biggest single cause of the capacity shortfall at launch was the unexpected length of the calls – which reduced the number of calls that could be handled by the staff and led to the unacceptable waits for calls to be answered on that first weekend.”
Earlier this month NHS England said NHS 111 was “steadily improving” following its chaotic launch. It quoted data for April showing 92% of patients were “very” or “fairly” satisfied with their experience of using it.
However, 66,000 of the 514,000 calls answered in April took more than a minute to answer, and the service has still not gone live in several areas, including Great Manchester and Devon.