Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Former Mid Staffs nursing director struck off


A former director of nursing at Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust has been struck off the nursing register after reaching a legal agreement.

Janice Harry, who is now retired, worked at the scandal hit trust between 1998 and 2006, when many of the high profile care failings there were judged to have occurred.

The announcement on Tuesday evening regarding her registration came just hours before an appeal of her case was due to be heard at the High Court today.

The Professional Standards Authority, which oversees the Nursing and Midwifery Council and other professional regulators, lodged an appeal at the High Court in December.

Its intervention came after an NMC conduct and competence committee decided in November to only issue Ms Harry with a five-year caution.

This was despite the panel finding her actions while director and chief nurse responsible for nursing at Mid Staffordshire had endangered patients, and that she had shown no insight into her failings.

The NMC agreed that the decision made by its panel was “unduly lenient” and the PSA’s appeal was allowed.

Ms Harry this week consented to be removed from the NMC’s register.

NMC chief executive and registrar Jackie Smith said: “We are pleased to confirm a legal agreement has been reached between the NMC, Professional

Jackie Smith

Jackie Smith

Standards Authority and Janice Harry, which will lead to her being struck off the nursing register.”

“We had previously raised concerns about the sanction imposed by an independent panel in November 2013, and took immediate steps to refer it to the PSA for review,” she said.

“The case raised important issues about the responsibility of nurses who hold senior management positions and their duty to ensure the protection of the public,” she added.

PSA chief executive Harry Cayton said: “This is the right outcome. Senior clinicians should be held to account when there are serious failings in patient

Harry Cayton

Harry Cayton

care for which they are responsible.

“The authority will continue to appeal the regulators’ fitness to practise decisions when it considers they are unduly lenient.”

In December, a High Court judge granted a last minute injunction to stop Ms Harry’s registration from lapsing, which would have prevention further disciplinary action being taken against her.

The NMC first heard evidence against Ms Harry in March last year but her case was twice adjourned.

In February 2013, another former director of nursing at Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust was cleared of any wrong-doing by the NMC.

Helen Moss took on the role at the trust in December 2006 and resigned from her job at the end of 2009. An NMC investigating committee deemed there was “no case to answer”.


Are you able to Speak out Safely?

Sign our petition to put pressure on your trust to support an open and transparent NHS



Readers' comments (19)

  • The next question is what has the NMC done about the performance of the panel that delivered the 5 year caution sanction? Are they still reviewing cases or have their services been dispensed with?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Luckily for Ms Harry, she probably doesn`t need to work again, unlike some of the real staff who lost their jobs because of her failings.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Question NMC do you not think you should have intervened earlier and then patients may not have died feels like too little to late... but whats new

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The NMC has come under scrutiny again for misjudgement. We pay a registration to practise as nurses and as such should uphold the standards. If the organisation is led by people who seem to condone bad practise and management then what is going on? It has needed the overaching organisation, the PSA to intervene. Sadly, the now CEO, Jackie Smith is precisely the person who had got the fitness to practise into such a bad state during the previous 10 years at the NMC. She was then elevated to the CEO despite the incompetence. Even if Janice Harry is now struck off, as she has now retired presumably she will have an adequate income from her pension as she was a Director of Nursing. What does 'the NMC and Jackie have come to a legal agreement' mean? Can the PSA as governing body over the NMC please review what is going on there? They seem to have acted on this case.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • One dealt with.

    Many still remain in post despite their failures!

    There is one near you plotting to reduce nursing numbers and replace RN's with "care assistants" !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Since when did someone consent to being struck-off? This Harry woman has retired and will be sitting pretty on an excellent NHS pension so in reality, she's got-off with allowing the death and suffering of thousands of people entirely Scott free!

    I hope the families of the deceased go after her personally in the courts. This woman should be left destitute for what she's done.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What sort of punishment is being struck off the register after you have retired!! NMC needs striking off! We are paying milllions in yearly fees for decisions like this.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lip service springs to mind NMC once again lets both nursing and the public down. What are we paying fees for?? because neither the public or the profession is being protected. I am sure our fee's keeps your office nice and warm and supplies of coffee for you to drink in abundance.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think this is the only right judgement. Some former NHS professionals convicted of serious offences have lost their pensions too.

    Some colleagues suggest it might apply in this case too, otherwise it's Fat City and no more need to work for even the most incompetent and uncaring NHS directors. There are issues of justice here, given the extreme and lasting suffering that resulted in Mid Staffs and some other badly run settings.

    Snag is, NHS pensions are paid based on contributions over a working life. There probably were some earlier jobs at which even the most useless director was deemed competent, so ought we consider depriving such people of lifetime's accrued pension, or just the super high rates for their most senior post?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How did Helen Moss get away with "No case to answer" when the poor care observed by the CQC in 2008 happened on her watch?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page20 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs