By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Government rejects 1% NHS pay rise in England

The government has rejected proposals to increase NHS staff pay by 1% and instead impose a two-year deal in which staff who receive incremental pay awards get no further rise at all − sparking threats of industrial action from some unions.

Health service staff will get a below inflation 1% pay rise in April, but not if they are due to get an annual “progression pay” increase via increments in the Agenda for Change contract.

The government published the NHS Pay Review Body report this morning and its response, which was issued by the Treasury.

The independent review body recommended a 1% increase for all NHS staff, but ministers rejected this citing the “unaffordable” cost of a 1% increase. The NHS Employers organisation estimated the cost of an across-the-board 1% increase would be £500m.

Under the plans revealed today, staff eligible for incremental pay increases on the Agenda for Change framework, which the government claimed were usually around 3.4%, will receive only these increments. Staff due to receive incremental rises of less than 1% will have these uplifted to 1%.

This will affect around 55% of staff on Agenda for Change, which covers almost one million workers.

Employees at the top of their pay bands, and therefore not eligible for an incremental rise, will get a 1% rise. However, these rises will be non-consolidated – meaning they are not added to employees’ substantive pay or pension.

This is to avoid permanently widening the pay gap between staff at the top of their band and those on lower pay points. This will affect 45% of staff.

This deal will also apply in 2015-16 when staff at the top of their band will receive a 2% pay rise, but this will again be non-consolidated.

The consolidated pay scales remain unchanged and will continue to be the basis for additional earnings, such as overtime and unsocial hours enhancements.

Doctors and dentists will receive a 1% pay uplift. Meanwhile, 400 very senior managers in the NHS who will have their pay frozen in cash terms for the next two years.

The government claims the deal will save over £200m in 2014-15 and over £400m in 2015-16.

Chief secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander said: “Public sector workers make a vital contribution to the effective delivery of public services. We need to continue with public sector pay restraint in order to put the nation’s finances back on a sustainable footing.”

Danny Alexander

Danny Alexander

The Treasury argued that incremental pay increases “for time served in a role” were “typically worth over 3%”.

But health unions reacted angrily in response. Both Unite and the GMB issued statements saying will be consulting its health service members on possible industrial action.

“We will be consulting with our members about the possibility of industrial action”

Rachael Maskell

Unite said the government’s decision on increments was a “divide and rule” tactic and will see about 45% of the NHS workforce getting no cost of living pay increase at all from 1 April.

The union stressed that the incremental increases were in recognition of increased skills as staff progressed in their careers – and was not part of the annual pay rise process.  

Unite head of health Rachael Maskell said: “Our members are being hit by the escalating cost of living crisis – their pay packets are shrinking year by year. Their hard work and dedication appears to count for nothing in an NHS which is being parcelled up for privatisation at an accelerating pace.

“We will be consulting with our members about the possibility of industrial action.”

“What sort of message does this give to the value this government places on dedicated NHS staff”

Christina McAnea

Unison Head of Health, Christina McAnea said: “It’s a disgrace that 70% of nurses and midwives will not even get a pay rise this year – what sort of message does this give to the value this government places on dedicated NHS staff.” 

She went on to accuse the government of “riding roughshod” over the pay review body, saying: “The government has shown complete contempt for the NHS, contempt for staff and contempt for patients and will pay the price at the ballot box.”

ChristinaAmandakendalChristina McAnea

Even a straight 1% increase would be nowhere near enough to meet the massive cost of living increases that NHS staff have had to cope with since 2010.

Criticising the government’s decision to deny any pay increase for 2 years to staff entitled to an increment, Ms McAnea said: “Increments are designed to reflect the growing skills and experience of nurses and other healthcare workers and are closely linked to competency. 

“They are not a substitute for the annual pay rise that is needed to meet the increasing cost of living,” she added. 

“The government clearly doesn’t understand how increments work,” she said. “As it stands, they save the NHS money but if this divisive plan goes ahead Unison will be arguing strongly that staff should be paid the full rate for the job from day one.”

Meanwhile, Peter Carter, chief executive and general secretary of the Royal College of Nursing, accused the government of expecting NHS staff to be “grateful while their contractually agreed terms of employment are torn up”.

“Less than half of nursing staff at the top of their pay increment will get a paltry 1% rise, following three years of pay restraint. The rest will simply get what they are contractually entitled to, if they can demonstrate they have developed their skills in the previous year,” he said.

Peter Carter

Dr Carter claimed the government was “holding a gun to the heads” of NHS staff by “forcing them to choose between continuing to receive their contractually agreed pay increments, or a very small pay uplift to help deal with rising costs of living”.

He added: “Nurses accepted in 2010 that the NHS needed to make efficiency savings. Four years on, having kept the NHS afloat through one reorganisation after another and despite the economic situation improving, they are still being asked to bear the burden of financial mismanagement, which was not of their making.

“The NHS in England has spent £3bn on a chaotic reorganisation, returned another £3bn of underspend to the Treasury, and has spent massive amounts of money on redundancy payments for senior managers who simply moved from one post to another within the NHS.”

“This amounts to a pay cut, pure and simple, and it is not good enough”

John Skewes

Jon Skewes, director for policy, employment relations and communication at the Royal College of Midwives, said: “This amounts to a pay cut, pure and simple, and it is not good enough.

“Midwives are angry about this. It is yet another body-blow to NHS staff facing rising pressures and working ever harder without any reward. Midwives have been struggling to cope with years of rising prices and stagnant wages.”

He added: “Morale in the profession is at rock bottom and this announcement will do nothing to help, indeed it will make it much worse. It is impossible to get the best from staff when they are treated this badly. You do not help the NHS by hurting NHS staff.”

Commenting on the public sector pay announcements, Trades Union Congress general secretary Frances O’Grady said: “It is ‘national destroy public sector morale day’.

“NHS staff have been singled out for particularly harsh treatment, at a time when they are already facing a funding crisis, staff cuts, privatisation and top-down restructuring.”

All NHS employees covered by the Agenda for Change framework received a 1% rise last April, regardless of increments, bringing to an end a two-year pay freeze.

New Editor, Steve Ford, explains how the NHS pay story has unfolded

 

Readers' comments (61)

  • This must be fought. Are politicians really crass enough to say 1% for us is too much and yet want eleven times that for themselves? Yes, of course they are. I hope the govt realises it is on a slippery slope. Shame the alternative is that dipstick Miliband...

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Strikes must be the reaction to this...

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • so if your at the top of the band you get 1% this year and 2% next year

    if your not you get jack s***

    pay everybody the top of the band for thier role then, why dont this govt understand the role is the top of the band and you progress every year when you gain expierence...so in effect for 8 years your getting staff on the cheap

    vote these idiots out next year...absolutely clueless

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • 11% for us MP's though!!

    "were all in this together"....remember

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • And the RCN says: rock all. I bet they'll not be calling for industrial action.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • billy_rubin

    Just what is the point of the Pay Review Body?

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • We're all in this together ha ha, yeah right.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • RCN Has Issued a Statement:

    http://www.rcn.org.uk/newsevents/press_releases/uk/anger_at_nhs_pay_decision

    While the RCN may not be the most vocal union, a considered response as a professional body has been made.

    The issue is what to do now?

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • all NHS Staff should consider industrial acton. Sad to say if it is left up to nurses (and I am one) then as usual nothing will happen as we are so divided already that we never have the strength to do anything that will elicit a change. Its NO GOOD WHATSOEVER to keep moaning ad nauseum about this kind of thing- do something!!! ALL governments rely on the servile attitudes of nurses (and other healthcare professions ) and this will never stop unless we all show we will not be treated as servants

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • come on nurses we are good at moaning there is a petition regarding our NMC increases that is struggling to find a 100000 people to sign it.Sign this too we have to stand up and fight this government.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • The ones due an incremental rise will be capped at 1% re 'staff eligible for incremental pay increases, which the government claimed were usually around 3.4%, will have these increases capped at 1%' So everyone is getting 1%? It also states these rises will be non-consolidated – meaning they are not added to employees’ substantive pay or pension. Suggest if you are close to retiring, go now! Sorry to say this, but I doubt nurses will take action, given the previous poor response to the rallying cries of the unions.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Normally I decline to comment on this issue as we never get heard. This time though I will be proposing to all Unison members in my hospital that we strike. I think this is the first time that I have looked at a headline and felt physically sick. I am disgusted and appalled by what I have just read, especially as we have been waiting and expecting a pay rise after four years.
    The RBS are giving out bonuses and they made a loss in the last financial year. I cannot believe that the LibDems are actually supporting this - Danny Alexander, you should resign immediately as this goes against all the principles and promises made at the last election.
    To end with all I can say is STRIKE, STRIKE, STRIKE!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • If nurses don't bother to vote given a ballot then that seals my decision to leave nursing altogether. All the continuing professional development I do, in another profession would see me on a lot more money by now. Of course it's not just the money but respect too. I feel so under valued by society in general.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • I agree that no pay rise - for many - is disgusting, however a 4 or 5% pay rise is of no use at all if you've lost your job. You have to weigh up job security (and tightening your belt) versus no job or having to work in the private sector with no paid sickness and reduced holidays. This isn't my own opinion, just throwing it into the mix.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • I and everyone I know are counting the days to retirement and to get out of this slave driven system.
    There is a huge skill gap looming and people are not being attracted into the system or retained within. Then they complain when staff are unABLE to care for patients adequately.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • "You have to weigh up job security (and tightening your belt) versus no job or having to work in the private sector with no paid sickness and reduced holidays. This isn't my own opinion, just throwing it into the mix. "
    This sounds like one of the many managers in the NHS.
    I would vote to strike and make a stand. It is so sad to see staff moral at an all time low with debanding, low staffing levels and ever increasing demands to the nurse on the frontline every day.


    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • This headline specifically mentions NHS staff in England. Have there been separate agreements for Scotland and Wales before or is this another lame attempt to influence the Scottish Independence referendum?

    Also, I'd like to know what effect this has on pensions - in easy to understand terms please!

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • This will become the norm and thousands of NHS staff
    at the top of their pay bands will have their pension frozen to what it is at the present moment - their pension will be based on what they are earning now. Why don't we publish the pension pots of all the senior staff of all the NHS Trust. This decision is based on the belief that staff such as nurses, midwives, doctors etc will not strike. It is time to give the government the shock treatment by calling for a strike.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Sickening considering the 15% salary increase most senior nhs managers got last year. Why is their salary not being discussed?

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • "We are all in this together" and then MP's take a pay increase of 11% is wholly inappropriate when nurses and frontline staff having their pay increase capped at 1%. BUT nurses who are working hard to continue to develop their expert knowledge and skills are told that they cannot have a national increase as they will be receiving the annual increment within their banding if they have managed to acheive all of the requirements to gain this.Shame on the goverment, who's increase will cost the public purse £4.6 million.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page |

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

newsletterpromo