Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Government unveils details of new wilful neglect offence


A new criminal offence of wilful neglect is to cover all formal healthcare settings, including the NHS and the private sector, under proposals revealed by the Department of Health.

The proposal goes further than recommendations made last year in two high profile reviews focused on patient safety.

The DH also said the offence would not just be limited to cases of serious harm or death, contrary to previous suggestions. It should be a matter for investigating and prosecuting authorities to decide when charges were appropriate, the DH said.

It estimates the offence, which will cover both individuals and organisations, could result as many as 240 criminal prosecutions a year.

The test for prosecuting an organisation for wilful neglect would be “whether the conduct of the organisation falls far below what can reasonably be expected in the circumstances”, the government said.

Ministers have unveiled a consultation on the new offence as part of its response to the Francis report into care failings at Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust. The consultation says the new law will cover not just the NHS but all formal healthcare – including the private sector, primary care, nursing and care homes, homecare services and the voluntary sector.

The Francis report proposed individuals guilty of poor care should face criminal sanctions. A subsequent review by US patient safety expert Don Berwick supported the creation of a new criminal offence where someone was guilty of “wilful or reckless neglect or mistreatment of patients”.

Don Berwick

Don Berwick

The consultation document says the new offence will help close a loophole in current legislation, which does not provide any criminal offences for the neglect of adults who have mental capacity. Current offences relate only to the ill-treatment of children, adults who lack capacity or are covered under the Mental Health Act.

In the consultation the DH said the policy should be viewed as a legal “backstop” to tackle criminal behaviour rather than a regulatory policy and should not inhibit professionals from “exercising clinical judgement on priorities or appropriate treatment”.

It cited an example of a busy accident and emergency department in which staff were forced to prioritise patients, leading some to wait longer in discomfort. It also said genuine errors or accidents should not be prosecuted.

The DH said: “This offence will send a strong message that poor care will not be tolerated and ensure that wherever ill-treatment or wilful neglect occurs, those responsible will be held to account.”

The consultation closes on 31 March.


Readers' comments (7)

  • michael stone

    I agree with this one: I agree about public AND private, I agree that it should cover situations beyond serious harm or death, and I agree that 'genuine errors or accidents should not be prosecuted'.

    I might even look at the consultation, if I can find the online time to do that.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    Have I missed a link to the Consultation ?

    I can't see a link - I'm hopeless at tracking down NHS consultations, so can NT please provide a link, assuming I've not missed one through my own lack of competence ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tinkerbell

    Good bring it on and ensure that managers who allow their staff to work in 'dangerously' understaffed units are brought to justice. I was always reprimanded by my managers for using the word 'dangerously' low staffing levels. They said 'dangerously' was inflammatory language and yet never addressed the situation that we remained working with 'dangerously low staffing levels'. What a pantomime!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell

    Exactly !

    This initiative must not be turned into a tool used for clinical nurse bashing!

    Managers know about the "dangerous" situations to which they deliberately expose patients and nurses.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • are there also tools for nurse bashing?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    Anonymous | 4-Mar-2014 12:17 pm

    Weren't bedpans traditionally used, when they were metal ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone | 4-Mar-2014 1:32 pm

    your droning on and on about nothing at all and obsession with responding on every website seems to be getting worse.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.