Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

London rethinks plans to slash nursing numbers


The NHS is re-examining a controversial review that concluded London’s hospitals could safely slash their nursing workforce through greater productivity.

The report in February identified savings of £421m in the capital’s nursing workforce over the next three years.

But Nursing Times has learnt that senior nurses have been involved in reassessing the conclusions of the “Safe and Financially Effective” review, which was carried out by the strategic health authority NHS London using methodology developed by management consultants.

The review had concluded that London’s non-foundation trusts could safely slash their £1.5bn total nursing spend by nearly a third. Individual reports sent to trusts advised some they could reduce nursing spend by half if they matched the efficiency of similar trusts.

However, an internal document released to Nursing Times under the Freedom of Information Act shows NHS London has had to re-examine the assessment.

The document said: “The SaFE analysis was perceived to be too high level to properly comprehend the nursing productivity challenge. Further analysis of the problem is required.”

Nursing Times understands members of the senior nursing community had raised concerns about the scale of savings being suggested by the analysis and that its methodology was not sophisticated enough.

The review compared the London trusts with other similar sized NHS organisations from around the country and calculated a “productivity opportunity” figure suggesting what they could save if they were as efficient.

Nursing Times understands the second review is almost complete and the revised “productivity opportunity” is a fraction of that identified in the SaFE report at some trusts.

An NHS London spokesman said: “The first programme was a desk top review and the current pilot is a trust based data collection exercise using a remodelled template.

“It takes account of a wider group of measures than the initial desk top review, which was for indicative purposes only. The recent pilot was developed by a group of senior nurses and nurse directors from the trusts.”

Royal College of Nursing head of policy Howard Catton said NHS managers should be wary of “productivity get rich quick schemes”.

He described the original review as a “blunt assessment” that failed to take into account London’s unique workforce and population variables.  

“It’s reassuring clinicians are being asked to look at what the workforce requirements are,” he added. “We’ll see what the next steps are.”

However, Mr Catton noted that nurses had been telling the college for some time that their organisations were already “lean” in terms of productivity and workforce.

Professor Anne Marie Rafferty, dean of the Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery at King’s College London, said: “Estimates of productivity gains are as good as the definitions and assumptions on which they are based, and in this instance rely upon what a ‘peer’ trust in another part of the country might be.

“Equally such estimates need to be calibrated against demand, which seems to show no signs of slowing down.”


Readers' comments (17)

  • Tinkerbell

    if it wasn't so serious it would be laughable. No wonder the tory spivs didn't want the risk register published and got it buried somewhere where no member of the public could have a look.

    Why don't they just have one big closing down sale of the NHS and have done with it rather than dragging out this misery on the pretence that we will still have an NHS after all this is over.

    For the future we will only be healthy if we are wealthy.

    Nothing is being learned about all these cutbacks because those in power have their own get rick quick agenda whilst pulling the rug out from beneath all working class folk.

    There's loadsa money to be made from other peoples misery.

    Whoever thought it would come to this in our society, money before human lives.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So these money saving schemes are now called "pilots" because they don't work?
    Using management consultants instead of front line clinicians was discredited years ago.
    Unfortunately, this backtracking is too late for some who have been penalised unfairly by this initiative.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What I dont quite understand is the term "desk top review". Does that mean that now the flaws in this have been highlighted by people in the know (commonly known as nurses) that they are admitting that they didnt actually do any research before plucking an idea out of the air with the intent of making the NHS all the more attractive to perspective buyers?

    As Tinkerbell says, it is almost farcical!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • anthony clay

    'The document said: “The SaFE analysis was perceived to be too high level to properly comprehend the nursing productivity challenge. Further analysis of the problem is required.”'

    The NHS probbaly couldn't investigate whether a brewery contained beer - the number of times you read some very expensive and fancy-looking 'report' and think 'Oh for heavens sake ! Do it again, and right this time, ,please !'

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Initiatives and ideas in NHS go in cycles of about 8-10 years. This one is a particularly nasty one, but there will be u-turns eventually

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yes, undoubtedly there will be U-turns - but not before a lot more havoc is wreaked on the NHS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why don't they just get rid of all the staff that come up with these ideas and sit around a table deciding how to get rid of frontline staff. If they went, money saved, problem solved.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What will the next amazing discovery to be made following months of costly, but effective research by our Accountant led Government appointed NHS Management teams and their Fiscal based Management Consultants?

    The wheel perhaps....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    Roger Hodgson | 6-Nov-2012 10:28 pm

    Not sure about the wheel - that could be too much of a challenge: fire for cooking, perhaps ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • zena Jones

    Roger Hodgson | 6-Nov-2012 10:28 pm

    DH Agent - as if ! | 7-Nov-2012 10:17 am

    The flint axe ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page20 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.