Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Political parties blame each other for hospital failings


The political fallout from the publication of Sir Bruce Keogh’s report into 14 failing hospital trusts continues, with Labour and the Conservatives seeking to blame each other over the scandal.

Prime Minister David Cameron has accused Labour of a “cover-up” over the high mortality rates, which has resulted in 11 hospitals being placed in special measures and subject to external inspections.

He said: “Where we have problems, and clearly there have been problems at these hospitals, the right thing to do is not cover that up as the previous government did, but to be open and frank about it and, as we’ve done, put those hospitals into special measures to give them assistance to make sure that performance improves.”

Jeremy Hunt said the report by Professor Sir Bruce Keogh, medical director of NHS England, represented Labour’s “darkest moment”, and singled out former health secretary Andy Burnham for criticism.

The health secretary claimed Labour was more concerned about its own reputation than exposing failings in the NHS when it was in government.

But Mr Burnham, facing calls of “resign” as he replied to Mr Hunt in the Commons, told him: “This report is about your government and the failings happening now on this government’s watch.”

The row is expected to deepen after Labour tabled an Opposition Day motion, which “recognises that the 14 trusts investigated by Sir Bruce Keogh have seen increasing problems since May 2010”.

It also calls on the government to publish the NHS transition risk register, which sets out the possible ramifications of the recent re-organisation.

The motion also states the government’s failure to implement key recommendations from a report earlier this year by Sir Robert Francis QC in to the horrific care standards at Stafford Hospital could make it more likely that there would be scandals at other hospitals in future.

Sir Bruce’s report was triggered by unusually high mortality rates at the trusts dating back to 2011.

The Royal College of Midwives (RCM) has called for MPs from both sides of the Commons to “work together” to act on the report’s recommendations and not use it as “political ammunition”.

An RCM spokesman said: “The government should be acting on its recommendations so that all patients no matter what they are going into hospital for can expect and receive the best possible care and outcomes.

“Like the Francis Report this is a reminder of why we all need to work hard to make the NHS as good as it can be, because failing to do this can have terrible consequences.

“The RCM urges politicians not to use this report as political ammunition, but as a wake-up-call to work together for the benefit of the patients the NHS is there to care for.”

Are you able to Speak Out Safely? Sign our petition to put pressure on your trust to support an open and transparent NHS.


Readers' comments (3)

  • Interesting that the government creates headlines by blaming the opposition, instead of responding to the report. I hope this is not another "shelved" report.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Are any of them really bothered by the state of the NHS, I don't think so. They all want to get rid of it, go private and then they can forget about it. ....or continue to use it as a political rubber ball. Either way it doesn't help the patients.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • All the time people are blaiming Politics ,they are ignoring the real problems, to much good money being thrown after bad.
    The NHS is just to big and unwhealdy , It is a great institution and definatety should not be Privatised, however , that said, it needs a massive rethink to make the whole system Service Orientated instead of Staff Orientated To understand the problems ,look at the BBC - great "low paid on the shop floor staff"(totally ignored), Lousy high paid top management (with all the say) with apparantly dubious standards.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.