Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Trust plans to count senior HCAs as nurses in cost cutting plans


A hospital trust is planning to bump up its nursing skill mix ratio with assistant practitioners, while using specialist nurses to do tasks normally done by doctors.

Under plans set out by Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust, the 4,650 strong workforce will be cut by up to 14% over the next five years.

The trust’s “Our People Strategy for 2013-2018” sets out an ambition to achieve a ratio of 60% registered to 40% unregistered nursing staff by the end of this year – up from 55% to 45% currently.

By April 2015 the trust plans to increase the ratio to 65:35. However, the 65% would include assistant practitioners who, although more highly skilled than other HCAs, are not registered with the Nursing and Midwifery Council.

Sue Matthews, Royal College of Nursing regional officer for Plymouth and Cornwall, said she was “extremely concerned” by the proposals. 

“The RCN recommend a ratio of 65% registered nurses to 35% non-registered nursing staff, which the trust say they are working towards. However, assistant practitioners would be non-registered staff and should not be counted in the 65% as they are in this paper. 

“Studies show that where there is a low ratio of registered staff quality care is care is compromised,” she said.

The strategy was approved by the trust’s board on Thursday and a consultation will now begin with staff. Interim nursing director Andrew MacCallum told the meeting he was committed to a 60:40 ratio of registered to unregistered.

The strategy proposes band 3 healthcare assistants step up to train as band 4 assistant practitioners or step down a band to the newly-created roll of “nursing assistant”.

Doctors’ job plans are to be redesigned to allow more work to be done by nurses and other non-medical professionals. For example, advanced nurse practitioners will run clinics currently delivered by doctors.

The trust wants to reduce the proportion of its income spent on pay from 65% to 59%. Its managers claim low staff turnover means a higher proportion of nurses and other staff have reached the top of their Agenda for Change pay band than at comparable trusts – pushing up the overall pay bill.

The trust says the extent of the headcount reduction will depend on the extent to which the pay bill can be reduced.

The strategy also sets out detailed plans to set up a “talent pool” for nurses and other staff who are judged to have the most potential and to improve staff development. Clinical simulation training will be rolled out to at least 70% of staff by 2018.

In addition, an employee reward scheme is to be developed, which could include sharing profits with staff.

But Ms Matthews said: “[While] the trust has made assurances that patient safety and quality care remains their priority… this paper does not convince me that they intend to employ appropriately qualified staff and with the expertise to the deliver safe, quality care that Cornwall residents deserve.”


Readers' comments (90)

  • Tinkerbell

    who'd have thought

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is disgraceful !

    I am unsure who the "Director of Nursing " is at the Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust but I will find out.

    Once I have a name and have verified the truth of this report I will request the NMC to determine if the post holder is fit to practise. I would suggest nurses employed by the Trust make the same request of the NMC

    Superficialy at least someone who is a registered nurse and who wishs to impliment such a mad cap scheme is not fit to practise.

    What next ? unqualified home trained surgeons or maybe they plan to replace physicians with the local herbalist !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What has happened to the NHS? I cant believe that patient safety & Care is even being considered to be compromised. When you or a family memeber goes into hospital you expect that they get treated and cared for appropriatley by the relevant qualified staff members. All i can say if i ever get ill near this trust I will be asking the ambulance driver to continue onto the next hospital! SHOCKING!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • unacceptable!

    it seems as if H&S have spent all their budget on trivia and have lost total control of what is vital.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    What is the point of having 'officially-recognised categorisations', if locally people can redefine them ?! And it is NEVER helpful to call HCAs nurses, or to call nurses doctors - the NHS is confusing enough, without such nonsense !

    However, I'm pretty sure that anything from the DH 'giving incentives' (i.e. cash) for HCA/nurse/doctor ratios, would be clear that it meant 'counted properly' !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is fairly obvious to say that HCAs can be used to replace nurses or substitute them in basic care and in exceptional circumstances although this is unacceptable for many nurse-related tasks but without the qualifications and NMC RN registration they can never count as nurses, any more than nurses can be counted as doctors, senior bankers or any other profession for which they are not trained, qualified, registered and regulated!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Think about this as a concept rather than a literal translation at an individual level:

    Every time the RN delegates a duty to the HCA which moves them away from the bedside the closer the HCA gets to registered status. When that happens the whole 70/30-60/40 standard will disappear and will need to be completely rewritten and the economics of the day will dictate what the new levels will be and on that day 65-35 RCN led standard will be a distant memory like Sister Plume.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • George Barnes

    Oh dear, oh dear – it beggars belief – how can they stoop so low as to break the Trade Descriptions Act. I thought it was against the law to impersonate a nurse. A Nurse is a Nurse is an RN, not an assistant practitioner, HCA (or even relative of a patient!) The definition of a nurse is someone who has done a recognized RN training and (in order to practise in the UK) is currently registered with the NMC as able to practice in that capacity.

    What next, porters being counted as HCAs? You know that if the Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust are allowed to get away with this misrepresentation then other trusts will be looking on and rush in to copy it. The government won't care – it makes them look better on paper. Trust managements will love it because it reduces their costs whilst seemingly keeping the level of qualified Nurses.

    God how ridiculous can management get? A lot worse probably!

    Ahem, “the newly-created roll of “nursing assistant?” Sorry but I when I started in 1974, I started off as a nursing assistant... it was one step up from being a ward orderly. Nothing new there at all.

    It's all to do with re-inventing the wheel again. Likewise it seems to me that “assistant practitioners” are merely the State Enrolled Nurse but without the accountability to a professional governing body... and as a Registered Nurse that really grates.

    Time for the Nursing Times to mount a campaign to make sure that the term “nurse” actually refers to someone who is legally entitled to call themselves a “Registered Nurse!”

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why did we bother to train if we can get in by the back door, this just devalues the whole profession just as we are trying to have our role recognized and will undermine us in the eyes of the public even more.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tinkerbell

    soon to be introduced nationwide, as this is what it has all been leading up too sadly.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page20 per page50 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.