By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Five a day fruit and veg 'not healthy enough', warn researchers

Five helpings of fruit and vegetables a day may not be enough, according to new research, which suggests seven portions could have a more protective effect.

The NHS recommends that every person has five different 80g portions of fruit and vegetables a day.

The suggested intake, based on World Health Organization guidance, can lower the risk of serious health problems such as heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes and obesity, according to NHS Choices.

But a new study suggests that eating seven or more helpings of fruit and veg a day can reduce a person’s risk of dying of cancer by 25%.

Can of fruit

Tinned fruit

Eating this many portions can also reduce a person’s risk of dying of heart disease by 31%, the authors said.

The researchers from University College London (UCL) examined the eating habits of 65,000 people in England between 2001 and 2013.

They found that seven or more helpings a day can reduce a person’s overall risk of death by 42% when compared to people who manage just one whole portion every day.

People who eat between five and seven a day have a 36% reduced risk of death, those who eat three to five portions have a 29% decreased risk and those who eat one to three helpings of fruit and veg have a 14% reduced risk of death.

The study, published in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, showed that fresh vegetables had the strongest protective effect, followed by salad and then fruit.

The authors also found that canned and frozen fruit appeared to increase the risk of death, instead of decrease it. And no significant benefit of fruit juice was noted.

The authors said the findings lend support to the Australian government’s advice of “two plus five” a day – encouraging people to eat two helpings of fruit and five portions of vegetables.

“Vegetables have a larger effect than fruit, but fruit still makes a real difference”

Oyinlola Oyebode

“We all know that eating fruit and vegetables is healthy, but the size of the effect is staggering,” said lead author Dr Oyinlola Oyebode, from UCL’s Department of Epidemiology and Public Health.

“The clear message here is that the more fruit and vegetables you eat, the less likely you are to die at any age. Vegetables have a larger effect than fruit, but fruit still makes a real difference.

“If you’re happy to snack on carrots or other vegetables, then that is a great choice but if you fancy something sweeter, a banana or any fruit will also do you good.

“Our study shows that people following Australia’s ‘Go for 2 + 5’ advice will reap huge health benefits.

“However, people shouldn’t feel daunted by a big target like seven. Whatever your starting point, it is always worth eating more fruit and vegetables. In our study even those eating one to three portions had a significantly lower risk than those eating less than one.”

Dr Oyebode added: “Most canned fruit contains high sugar levels and cheaper varieties are packed in syrup rather than fruit juice.

“The negative health impacts of the sugar may well outweigh any benefits. Another possibility is that there are confounding factors that we could not control for, such as poor access to fresh groceries among people who have pre-existing health conditions, hectic lifestyles or who live in deprived areas.”

An accompanying editorial in the jounral suggested that it may be time to rethink the “five a day” message.

The authors, from the University of Liverpool, also suggest that it may be time for the NHS to review its guidance on tinned fruit and fruit juice.

They wrote: “NHS guidance currently suggests that dried, tinned or canned fruit, smoothies and up to 150ml of fruit juice, all legitimately count towards the ‘5 a day’, while also silently delivering large amounts of refined sugar.”

They added: “The UK ‘5 a day’ campaign offers a target which is pragmatic, but one which might provide a false reassurance and risk complacency in the quarter of the population that already hits this target. They need to aim higher.”

But some have questioned the findings of the research, saying that other dietary factors were not taken into account and those who eat large amounts of fruit and vegetables are likely to have a healthy diet in general.

Others also raised concerns about the finding on tinned and frozen fruit, saying that in the survey researchers were not able to distinguish between the two.

Dr Gunter Kuhnle, food scientist from the University of Reading, said: “The researchers were not able to distinguish between the two in their survey, making it impossible to make a distinction in later analysis.

“It’s possible that eating tinned fruits are an indicator of high sugar intake, but it might also be a marker of poverty or lower socio-economic class, as there is no data, it’s simply not possible to speculate.”

Readers' comments (10)

  • a no brainer! didn't we already know this?

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Tiger Girl

    An interesting aspect of this, is that vegetables were considered to be more helpful than fruit: so what does the main picture above show? Two apples, a pear and a banana.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • michael stone

    Will sales of tinned peaches slump as a result of this study ?

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Tiger Girl | 2-Apr-2014 10:50 am

    now classified as vegetables

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Really!?

    Does this 7 portions apply across the board?

    What about those who eat 7 portions but also eat 7 portions of fish and chips per month?

    Canned increases the risk? Really?

    Is that because those who eat canned food are generally to be from lower social classes and will most probably eat poorer foods?

    garbage research yet again, scaremongering twaddle!

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • tinkerbell

    better to have a tinned peach slice than none at all or is it worse? You could always wash the syrup juice off before eating.

    Wasn't marmalade invented to prevent scurvy? Whatever that is, was.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Tiger Girl

    P. Damien | 2-Apr-2014 2:56 pm

    The rationale was that canned fruit is usually in very sugar-rich syrup - not sure it said canned vegetables were bad.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • michael stone

    As a health-conscious person, I can see I’ll need to change my dietary habits.

    At present I ensure that I reach my 5-a-day by topping up the banana and beans (baked) with my fruit-drink of choice, supplied by ‘The Olde English Apple Cove of Somerset Totally Blotto Cyder Company’. They helpfully tell me how many portions of apple per bottle, although they call these portions units: often I need 4 units a day to reach my target of 5. I’ll probably need to up this to 6 units, in future. Or perhaps 10, as fruit counts for less than vegetables now.

    The homeopathic method of vegetable intake is helpful too – licking a sprout once, counts as 20 portions, and licking it twice counts as 5 portions. You must be careful to actually lick the sprout: if you think about licking a vegetable, but do not actually lick it, you will receive a huge overdose (homeopathic research has shown this to be definitely true).

    At least I know I’m doing the right thing.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • I like that! If I think about a huge plate of deep fried fish and chips followed by a large slice of Schwarzwälderkirschtorte topped with lashings of double whipped cream will I get fat?

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • michael stone

    Anonymous | 5-Apr-2014 2:31 pm

    Yes - in my experience, it goes 'think about it first, then do it': and, once you've thought, it is clearly even worse (homeopathic intake) if you don't follow through and eat the stuff.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

newsletterpromo