By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Comment

'Nutritious meals count for nothing if they are cold'

Yet again TV programmes and reports are lamenting the state of hospital food.

Soil Association research says more than a third of people thought hospital meals unacceptable, while two-thirds took in their own food as that provided was inedible. Despite 17 government initiatives costing more than £54m, the association says meals are generally no more palatable or nutritious than a decade ago. Chefs Jamie Oliver and Heston Blumenthal think they can succeed where others have failed.

Malnutrition “almost always becomes worse during a hospital stay” claims the Council of Europe. This contravenes Regulation 14 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities), which states: “Where food and hydration are provided… as a component of the carrying on of the regulated activity, the registered person must ensure that service users are protected from the risks of inadequate nutrition…”

Figures from the NHS Information Centre show 13,500 patients became malnourished while in hospital last year and the Department of Health suggested more than 50,000 patients in England could be suffering from malnutrition or conditions complicated by it. All this even though evidence shows good nutrition leads to healthier patients who recover more quickly.

The DH claims £500m is spent on food (£1.67 per meal) in England each year; this contrasts with hospital food budgets, which vary from £1.60 to £2.40 per day – and about 43% of hospitals have reduced their budgets this year. This is a false economy as malnourished patients are in hospital for longer, are three times more likely to develop complications and have higher mortality rates. Effectively treating malnutrition has been estimated to save the average American hospital $1m each year – this cannot be achieved with inadequate hospital food.

This is a long-standing problem but it is important to realise food provision is increasingly outsourced to commercial companies. Meals are mass produced off site and “regenerated” using steam or reheated in trolleys or individual containers. Such is the reliance on this, some hospitals have no kitchens at all.

This method of food preparation can deliver high-quality meals – after all it’s no different from chilled foods available in supermarkets. What is needed is the right specification, good-quality control and proper training of staff responsible for reheating or regeneration. “Service” is equally important; the most nutritious meal counts for nothing if it is served cold, unattractive and left uneaten.

The NHS has a duty to feed its patients properly and should ensure the health gains available from investing in food are realised. But food is not only about nutrition but also about patient experiences. So all health professionals need to ensure that patients can access their food and, where necessary, are helped to eat it.

Susan Holmes is director of research and development, Faculty of Health and Social Care, Canterbury Christ Church University

Readers' comments (4)

  • Unfortunately some Hospital Trusts are not willing or able to afford to prepare meals on site. There are some hospitals that provide excellent food for their patients and some that do not do this, the conclusion it is down to money some hospitals are prepare to spend money on in house catering and some prefer to have meals supplied by catering contractors. There have been issues in the past concerning staff not feeding patients who are unable to feed themselves but sometimes what is served up to patients is not even worth looking never mind eating.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • An interesting point:

    The Liverpool Daily Post's weekly debate feature is all about hospital meals. Updated 10:46am 23 March 2011

    On Tuesday, the Daily Post revealed that prisoners have up to £12 a day spent on their meals while being held in police cells on behalf of the prison service, but some hospitals in our area spend as little £3.02 on meals for patients a day.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Gemma Watford

    Lets get all trusts to roll out the magnetic picture card system qhich is already in place at Milton Keynes Hospitals NHS trust. then patients could specify what they liked, and that food could be then brought in obviuosly not to be beyond the cost of the food budget. Then the patient expriece of eating an drinking would be much more pleasant

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • In Switzerland all patients have to pay a small amount for every day they are hospitalised which goes towards their food and laundry. It is no more than they would have to pay if they were eating at home. If their income is below the basic living wage they get financial support from their local council. I see no reason why patients in the UK should not pay a small amount which would cover their meals and laundry which they would be paying at home anyway.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

newsletterpromo