Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

CQC finds older people not assisted at meal times


Some patients were not given physical assistance to eat their meals, the Care Quality Commission (CQC) has found.

The CQC was reviewing Barnsley Hospital Foundation Trust and Whiston Hospital, part of the St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals Trust.

One patient at Barnsley Hospital, South Yorkshire, also had an empty urine bottle placed on their table while they were eating.

The criticism levelled at the trusts was revealed as part of the CQC’s England-wide review of care for older people in 100 hospitals.

Last week, it emerged doctors had to prescribe drinking water for patients at one NHS hospital because they were not given enough while others were left unfed.

The latest batch of reports released by the CQC found that some patients at Barnsley Hospital were not given help with eating - with staff unsure about which patients had specific nutritional needs.

The CQC review also expressed concern about the way older people were fed at Whiston Hospital.

Inspectors raised “moderate concerns” about the two trusts, in the CQC’s latest batch of 14 reports - meaning there was good practice on some wards, but not others.

A further two trusts have been told they are meeting standards but must do more to maintain them while 10 hospitals passed inspections.

The two trusts told to maintain their standards were St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust in south London and Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.

The 10 trusts that met all the standards were: University College London Hospitals Foundation Trust, Lewisham Healthcare Trust, Heatherwood and Wexham Park Hospitals Foundation Trust, Kettering General Hospital Foundation Trust, Kingston Hospital Trust, Taunton and Somerset Foundation Trust, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre Trust, Calderdale and Huddersfield Foundation Trust, North Middlesex University Hospital Trust and York Hospitals Foundation Trust.

A national CQC report on the full audit will be published in September.


Readers' comments (15)

  • Here's an idea then, DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!!!! Until the CQC start backing Nurses up when we complain about things like staffing levels etc, until they start coming in and ENSURING managers/homes/etc are complying with best practice by FORCING practice to change instead of just coming out with the usual 'standards are not being met' press release, then they are simply losing credibility with every statement they make.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is the CQC fit for purpose?

    Sadly, I think this says more about the CQC than it does about the healthcare.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • good comments.

    it seems a very annoying total waste of money. i get fed up to reading the same old reports which cost a lot to produce only to be filed away in the archives before all the appalling stories hit the press.

    Why is this body only there to investigate and write reports. why do they not act on their findings? What is the point?

    i suppose it is quite nice to travel round the countryside spending an hour or two looking round a home and ticking all the boxes, one wouldn't even need to think, and then going off for a good lunch somewhere before perhaps doing another visit in the afternoon and then going back to the office to write a report and then going home to put one's feet up, probably all for a good salary which could be better spent on front line staff and meeting financial needs towards the shortfalls in patient care for which they are always saying there is no money! I expect even the reports follow a set format which does not require much thinking or time to produce, especially when they always repeat the same information!

    Apologies, I expect my comments are just as obvious and repetitive as the investigations and resultant reports themselves!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Apparently the CQC are short staffed too! Should give them an insight of compassion and understanding perhaps?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Speaking as a member of staff at St Helens and Knowsley NHS Trust and working on a care of the elderly ward I am totally appauled at the results of the report by the CQC, all patients on the ward where I work have their intake monitered, this highlights patients that refuse to eat and those that are unable to eat, we are constantly striving to increase nutrition in these patients, we have protected meal times and all staff regardless of rank assist with feeding, we are totally commited to ensuring our patients intake is as good as it can be, I myself look at each patient as if they were a member of my own family regardless of any opinion I may have of them, after all if my parents were to come into hospital I would expect them to be treated with dignity and respect even if the staff looking after them disliked them. The moment I enter the ward for my shift I know I am 100% commited to delivering the best quality care I can to the patients in my care .I am totally saddened by this report and can only hope that things improve.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • we are not there to judge whether we dislike our patients or not and I am not sure why this has been mentioned by a professional nurse. there is no obligation to like or dislike somebody to do a good job as there is any obligation for others to like us. important is to develop a professional therapeutic, empathetic caring relationship. like and dislike should not be part of the agenda but assisting individuals who are difficult may be a challenge which needs to be accepted. we cannot choose which patient are admitted to our wards on the grounds of personality, nor can the patients choose who will look after them and they may also dislike whoever this is! it works both ways.

    judgement leads to stereotyping which in turn leads to labelling, discrimination, stigmatisation, bullying and potential ostracising - a sad state of affairs for both the perpetrator and for the victim.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 4-Jun-2011 2:27 am that was my point, things won't improve until the CQC get some teeth, and probably a backbone, and start doing MORE than simply writing reports on the obvious, and going after the people who are really responsible (managers/trust directors/government) for failings in care instead of simply blaming frontline staff.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    Not helping patients to eat, is nothing new and turns up in a report every few years !

    My dad was basically starving, after an operation in 1995, until, we complained and got a dietician invovled - then, because it became detailed as part of their job, the ward staff checked tha the was eating.

    But, that should be routine - people do need food !

    Most 'complaints bodies' are fairly useless, in my own experience, and most 'new enquiries' only throw up things, previously discovered in earlier enquiries.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 4-Jun-2011 2:27 am

    When was the last time your hard work and dedication was the subject of a report? Probably never. Of course we should always strive to give the best care. We are nurses after all. But I'm sure that most people are unaware of the barriers you and your colleagues have to overcome daily, ( staff shortages, poor resources, unrealistic expectations, etc), whilst giving the 100% that you do.

    Anonymous | 4-Jun-2011 9:59 am

    In my time, I have nursed some absolute horrors, who I have disliked intensely. People don't suddenly become nice and woolly when they are ill. However, they have never known that I dislike them; because I have treated them with the same respect and care I would any patient. I am a nurse who takes her job very seriously, but I am also a human being. It is a shame that you chose to focus on this aspect of the previous commenter's post, and not the fact that he/she is obviously a deeply caring individual. But of course, you were passing a judgement, because you too are human.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • To anonymous 4th June 2011 9.59am

    Thank you for your comment which I believe was focused on me,(anonymous 4th june 2011 2.27 am) I was not trying to judge anyone as you understood.There is no place for judgement in nursing I am aware of that, I was just trying to make the point that we are all human and it is normal to dislike people but regardless of the fact I would never treat anynone differently, i'm sorry if anonymous 4th june 2011 9.59am thought I was un-professional,I never intended to give that impression I was just trying to make the point that I know I give 100% and that I felt upset at the CQC report. More staff is what is obviously needed but this is never going to happen,I do honestly believe that if staff who obviously lack commitment were replaced with staff that are commited things would improve drastically.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page20 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs