By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Hunt calls for safeguarding review in wake of Savile abuse

Health secretary Jeremy Hunt has called for regulators and trust leaders to review safeguarding procedures after an investigation revealed that “weak systems” in hospitals had allowed celebrity Jimmy Savile to abuse scores of patients over many years.

Twenty-eight hospitals have today published reports into any involvement Savile had with their organisations. Two bigger investigations were carried out at Leeds Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust and Broadmoor Hospital, where abuse was found to be widespread.

“These reports paint a terrible picture, as time and again victims were ignored”

Jeremy Hunt

The investigation teams for Broadmoor and Leeds heard 71 peoples’ accounts of being abused by Savile. Of these, 19 were under the age of 16 at the time, and three people reported being raped.

Staff as well as patients reported abuse, and many of the incidents took place in public areas such as wards and corridors.

Jimmy Savile

Jimmy Savile

Sue Proctor, chair of the Leeds independent investigation, said: “Leaders in every NHS hospital trust should read this report, and in particular the accounts from the victims.

“They should consider if such events could happen in their organisation, and what controls they have in place to assure themselves that patients, visitors and staff in their organisation are protected from harm.”

At Broadmoor, Savile had keys to the hospital and was given a non-executive position on the trust board in 1987.

When a hospital taskforce was set up he was given a “direct managerial role”.

He used his influence to ensure that his friend, Alan Franey, was given the job of general manager even though he was “relatively inexperienced for such a challenging post”, according to the report.

Savile was also a volunteer porter at Leeds General Infirmary where he sometimes attended consultant ward rounds, helped with the delivery of intimate care such as bed baths and regularly visited the mortuary.

He often arrived on wards unannounced and gained access in the daytime and at night.

The investigation report into Leeds said that Savile had a close relationship with the head porter and “significant” relationships with some consultants.

He had a “unique level of access to the infirmary for a period of 50 years”, it added.

In three of the victims accounts there was “evidence that Savile’s ability to abuse was assisted or facilitated by other people”, and the victims believed them to be hospital employees.

Nine people told staff members about their abuse - six were patients and three were staff.

The report said: “Concerns about Savile were not escalated to the board of governors, or more latterly the chief executives of the trust boards.”

It also found that “the lack of curiosity about Savile from those at the top of the organisation appears to have been symptomatic of a broader disconnect between senior managers and the rest of the organisation”.

The Broadmoor report said that its investigators found “no reliable evidence” that any staff or patient complaints about Savile at the time were reported to senior staff or investigated.

“Both staff and patients believed that Savile was in a position of power and authority and could make their lives much worse, and the institutional culture of Broadmoor at the time strongly discouraged both groups from reporting,” the report said.

“We conclude that the institutional culture in Broadmoor was previously inappropriately tolerant of staff-patient sexual relationships and could be hostile to anyone who tried to report one.”

One female staff member reported being sexually abused by Savile in the central hall of Broadmoor while staff and patients were walking past.

A statement from Mr Hunt said: “These reports paint a terrible picture, as time and again victims were ignored, or if they were not, little or no action was taken.

Jeremy Hunt

Jeremy Hunt

“The systems in place to protect people were either too weak or were ignored. People and institutions turned a blind eye. 

“Today, changes to the way that we guard against abuse would make it much harder for someone like Savile to perpetrate these crimes for so long. 

“Savile was, however, never convicted of any offence – so this safeguarding system depends on much better awareness, and a much heightened vigilance against such abuse by professionals and the public than there was in the past.

“So, today I am writing to all the system leaders in the NHS – NHS England, the NHS Trust Development Authority, Monitor and the [Care Quality Commission] – to ask them to ensure they, and all trusts, review safeguarding arrangements in light of the reports and ensure they are confident about patient safety.

“For its part, the Department of Health has accepted all the specific recommendations assigned to it in the Broadmoor report.”

The chief executive of Leeds, Julian Hartley, said: “I want to take this opportunity to emphasise to our patients, their families and members of the public that the way hospitals in Leeds operate today is very different from the accounts included in the report, with a much greater focus now on security, safeguarding and raising concerns.

“The board at Leeds Teaching Hospitals [Trust] is committed to learning from the findings of this report and ensuring we have the highest standards of safeguarding and security in place.”

Chief executive of West London Mental Health Trust, Steve Shrubb, said Broadmoor was a “very different place than it was in Jimmy Savile’s time”.

“The investigation confirms that since the hospital became part of West London Mental Health Trust in 2001, it significantly improved its culture and management, security, policies and procedures so as to minimise the risk of this kind of abuse now and in the future.

“However, the trust is not complacent and we are undertaking a further audit of our systems and governance to assure ourselves, our patients and the public that all our services are safe, high quality and fit for purpose.”

Readers' comments (15)

  • He really is the king of the knee-jerk reaction isn't he?
    I think, if he bothered to learn a bit more about the UK healthcare system he would know that Safeguarding procedures are far more stringent now then they were when these abuses took place.
    He is clearly undermining all of the work that has been done since then. Why does he always want to run-down the NHS?

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • I believe it is a positive move forward in reviewing the safeguarding policies, both staff and the public need to feel confident there concerns are not only heard but addressed. Sadly both the NHS and private providers are not transparent and open. Most people who work in the care profession do not raise concerns due to the fall out they are still not assured even under the whistle blowing policy. And yes I do believe we have come a long way however more work needs to be done to safeguard individuals in our care.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • michael stone

    'Safeguarding' is a problematic issue - but Savile WAS GIVEN KEYS to some hospitals (certainly to Broadmoor, as I've just downloaded that report) and this isn't a typical 'safeguarding' issue, is it !!!

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Can I have Mr Hunt's job please? I have been known to state the obvious upon occasion and have even shut a barn door after a horse bolted once!
    On consideration though I don't think that I am cold blooded and calculated enough to actively seek to destroy something that I am charged to protect!

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • tinkerbell

    what about the BBC harbouring all these celebs of the time, when the BBC had all these paedophiles working for them in their TOTAL INSTITUTION with a conspiracy of silence and yet politicians are still courting the media and jumping into bed with them to get their corrupt propaganda out to destroy OUR NHS as the documentary on TV highlighted last night in the phone hacking scandals. Nothing has been learned, not a thing.

    They're all at it! Sadly.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • What I find so hard to understand was the ease of access Jimmy Saville had to Broadmoor Special Hospital. My late father was a member of a team who visited the Special Hospiatals to monitor and report on standards of care in the 1970's and 1980's. In order to gain access the visitors who where on official business had to have Home Office clearance signed by the Home Sectreatry. They were searched on arrival and departure and were escorted at all times.
    Jimmy Saville was a DJ and TV personality with no official function yet he appears to have had open access to Broadmoor. You and I can not arrive at Broadmoor and gain access without good reason. A very odd state of affairs.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • A bit late isn't he? What about the victims and their families living with this from day to day? The government knew a long time ago about Saville's actions and did nothing. SHAME ON THEM

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • A regular review of any measures to protect staff and patients will avoid complacency. Rather than censure Hunt for calling for this we should be lobbying him to influence cabinet colleagues on having their own safeguards against being influenced by high profile figures and making duff appointments to non elected roles. Savile's influence was in another era but the more recent appointment of Coulson illustrates our policiticians need to get their own house in order.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • michael stone

    Anonymous | 26-Jun-2014 6:22 pm

    Saville was made 'lead' on some sort of 'Improve Broadmoor' project - his position was (disputed) rubber stamped by, Edwina Currie [who was the relevant minister at the time]. Savile conned a lot of people - and the ones he didn't con, were either ignored or else didn't stick their heads into the line of fire, so far as I can make out.

    http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jun/26/edwina-currie-regret-jimmy-savile-broadmoor

    The former health minister Edwina Currie has said she regrets ever setting eyes on Jimmy Savile, after an inquiry into his sexual abuse of NHS patients criticised the access she allowed him to Broadmoor hospital.

    She denied appointing Savile – who was not a doctor or NHS employee – to a governance taskforce that took charge of Broadmoor in 1988 and stressed that she was only responsible for that portfolio for "around four months".

    However, an NHS inquiry found that a senior civil servant, Cliff Graham, appointed Savile to the managerial role, and Currie retrospectively rubber-stamped the decision.

    Currie was subsequently supportive of Savile's promises to confront the Prisoner Officers Association (POA) about working practices, and issued a press release at the time praising his work. The statement ended: "He is an amazing man and has my full confidence."

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Hindsight is a wonderful thing, and I guess someone of his (Savile's) stature was hard to question, along with the financial gains that came with it. Abuse, of a lesser degree, hopefully, still goes on an is ignored, for whatever reason, with whistle blowers being the ones that lose out. The whole culture of our society needs to adapt to address all abuse issues. I do hope Savile isn't anywhere near consecrated ground.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Didn't act alone though did he? Who was allowing him?

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • is that the inside of a British hospital? looks much more like a prison!

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • I think all sorts of things like this could go on in hospitals. Staff inviting "friends" into their work areas in after hours time. Impressing their friends or making friends by catering to their would-be friends "desires". Why would Savile want to visit the mortuary for God's sake.
    Whistleblowing needs to be rewarded - openly, like Most Popular Nurse Award or Most Alert Night Duty Nurse Award or Most Diligent Cleaner Award. Yes, Most Regular Whistle Blower Award sounds great to me.

    This whole thing was absolutely horrifying. Sick.
    It would be a comfort to think that most of this behaviour has been "slowed" in hospitals. Would be a comfort.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Will this review investigate his parliamentary colleagues as well? As the BBC tried to do but were warned off by Cyril Smith.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • It might help to stop letting dodgy outsiders interfere with the running of the NHS in the first place.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

newsletterpromo