By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Heatherwood and Wexham Park Hospitals Foundation Trust

Short staffing and culture concerns exposed at Wexham Park

An unannounced inspection at Wexham Park Hospital in Slough found evidence of inadequate care, regular short staffing on “almost all wards”, and a culture where “staff did not always feel they could raise concerns”.

The Care Quality Commission has told Heatherwood and Wexham Park Hospitals Foundation Trust, which runs the hospital, to make urgent improvements, after inspectors concluded it was more focused on “responding to… targets” than “ensuring that overall patient experiences were positive”.

Findings from the CQC’s visit to the trust in October were published today. It discovered poor standards of cleanliness and inadequate infection control, evidence of poor record keeping, and that “people’s privacy and dignity was not always respected”.

Of the nine standards checked during the inspection, the trust was judged to have failed all except one – management of medicines.

The regulator raised concerns over leadership and care delivery in Wards 7, 4 and the Acute Medical Unit, where inspectors saw a number of occasions where the quality of care given to patients was below standard.

Inspectors also heard complaints from patients about the quality of nursing care and poor communication, which had resulted in people’s privacy and dignity not always being respected.

Despite a previous warning from the CQC about staffing levels and on-going recruitment efforts by the trust, almost all the wards inspected were found to be regularly short staffed.

In addition, staff did not always feel they could raise concerns or make suggestions, the CQC said, and number of staff expressed concerns about bullying and harassment from managers. In some cases, staff raised concerns with inspectors but were reluctant to be named for fear of reprisals.

CQC regional director Adrian Hughes said: “We found there was a clear emphasis on responding to national and local clinical targets but less emphasis on ensuring that overall patient experiences were positive.”

Mr Hughes added that the regulator would monitor the trust’s improvement actions “closely”, and that it would return to inspect the trust on 11 February.

It is not the first time the CQC has raised concerns and issued warning notices to the trust, which provides services to a population of 450,000 across Ascot, Bracknell, Maidenhead, Slough, south Buckinghamshire and Windsor.

Following an inspection last May, the CQC released an equally damning report which identified quality and management failings and similar problems with staffing levels and patient dignity.

Responding to today’s report, the trust said it was taking a “two-pronged approach of extra training… and improved performance management to ensure all our staff deliver acceptable care”.

It said it had invested over £2m in new staff in the last 12 months and would “continue to actively recruit and use temporary staff where necessary”.

The trust added: “We are disappointed that we have not made as much improvement as the CQC believed we should have in five months. We are committed to making sustainable change and will continue to work hard to drive the improvements we all want to see.”

Following the CQC’s latest warning notices, its fellow regulator Monitor announced a package of regulatory measures to try to help the trust improve.

These include appointment of an improvement director to hold management to account against their action plan, and provision of external expertise to support the trust.

 

Are you able to Speak Out Safely? Sign our petition to put pressure on your trust to support an open and transparent NHS.

Readers' comments (9)

  • '... and a culture where “staff did not always feel they could raise concerns”.'

    What a surprise!

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • With the NMCs new revalidation proposals, qualified nurses well now be far less likely to raise concerns for fear of losing their livelihood!

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Most nurses are not able to make complaints. I did as a bank nurse and was refused any more shifts at Sunderland Royal Hospital. Staff, those in the NHS and private are effectively gagged
    Grievances are simply ignored
    The majority of staff are dependent on their jobs and that is what managers & companies use against staff. I am at a stage where I can speak out freely against the abuse and poor standards anyone can send me detail and Ill forward the complaint

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • tinkerbell

    Surprise visit booked for 11 February.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • michael stone

    tinkerbell | 8-Jan-2014 3:50 pm

    What does that mean Tink ?

    Are you going to turn up on the 11th Feb at WPH dressed as a fairy, and then surprise them all by whipping off your outer garments to reveal that you are actually a pixie ?

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Yet more evidence of grossly incompetent "management".

    These clowns need to be held to account.

    The continuing and repeated saga of a management culture associated with an "I don't care" attitude coupled with expectation of a bigger bonus must be bought to an end.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • tinkerbell

    michael stone | 9-Jan-2014 1:52 pm
    No, not quite. What I mean is I have a feeling that the 11 February will be a very contrived, rehearsed day, with the most outspoken staff, if any, on a day off and the area fully staffed until 12 February.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • michael stone

    tinkerbell | 9-Jan-2014 6:08 pm

    I must admit to not being acquainted with the detail to this one, but clearly there is to be an inspection on Feb 11th. In the context of that, I'm fairly certain that your comment is right - which is why announced inspections are frequently pointless, of course.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Well, there's a surprise... Who would have ever thought Nursing shortages would lead to a problem in the workplace?

    The thought never occurred to Hospital Management 'teams' and their accountancy based masters, who are after all only concerned with bean counting.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

newsletterpromo