By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Termination of pregnancy: a review of psychological effects on women

This study reviews the evidence on the psychological effects of induced abortion.

  • Figures and tables can be seen in the attached print-friendly PDF file of the complete article in the ‘Files’ section of this page


Allyson Lipp, PhD, MSc, MA, RNT, RGN, is principal lecturer, Faculty of Health, Sport and Science, University of Glamorgan, and postdoctoral fellow at the Research Capacity Building Collaboration Wales.


Lipp, A. (2009) Termination of pregnancy: a review of psychological effects on women. Nursing Times; 105: 1, 26-29.

Termination of pregnancy may have psychological consequences that are greater than its physical impact. Following a literature search and appraisal, this article explores some of the main themes arising from studies on the psychological impact. The results demonstrate that negative psychological effects are more likely in certain high-risk women. A table of indicators has been developed which could assist nurses in recognising whether a woman is at risk of negative psychological effects after termination.

Implications for practice

  • Some women would benefit from psychological support after a termination of pregnancy, and this support should be targeted towards those who are most at risk of experiencing negative psychological consequences.

  • Nurses should establish the presence of risk factors for adverse psychological impact before termination to determine whether support is likely to be necessary.

  • It is important to target assistance to ensure that those who need it receive it in a timely manner while allowing those who do not to move on.


Termination of pregnancy is a relatively minor, safe procedure that has minimal physical impact (Rorbye et al, 2005). Psychologically, however, the potential impact is less clear. This article explores relevant literature on this subject.

In 2007 a total of 198,500 terminations were carried out in England and Wales, a rise of 2.5% compared with 2006 (Department of Health, 2008). The NHS funded 87% of these, and 55% of the total took place in the independent sector under the NHS contract. However, termination of pregnancy in the UK is only available to women meeting the strict legal criteria of the Abortion Act 1967.

With nearly 200,000 terminations per year, even small detrimental psychological effects could impact on many women for an indeterminate length of time.

Following a comprehensive assessment, a termination is performed in one of two ways. Medical termination is a two-stage process that requires a brief visit to a licensed venue where medication is administered orally. This is followed by a 5-6 hour stay 24-48 hours later, when further abortifacient medication is administered and the termination occurs. Surgical termination is a one-stage, day-case procedure usually performed under general anaesthetic. Women may be given the choice of a medical or surgical termination depending on their preference, stage of pregnancy and local availability of services (Lipp, in press; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2004).

Complex nature of the evidence

Owing to the diverse nature of the topic, in addition to accessing major policy documents, the main electronic databases were searched for English language articles. These included Medline, CINAHL, PsychLit and Science Direct. Keywords used were:

  • Abortion;

  • Termination of pregnancy;

  • Psychological effects;

  • Emotion;

  • Anxiety;

  • Depression.

This review does not claim to be systematic in the strict sense (Greenhalgh, 1997). The quality of the studies accessed varied, as did sample size and validity measures.

Randomised controlled trials are the least biased form of research (Gray, 1997) but women cannot be ‘randomised’ into termination. Quantitative evidence, therefore, centres on observational studies that may inadvertently under-report events as women may be reluctant to disclose a past termination (Thorp et al, 2002).

Some of the studies included are qualitative. However, while these are a useful contribution to understanding psychological consequences of termination, owing to their specific design they cannot normally be generalised to the population (Bowling and Ebrahim, 2005). Some of the research on the topic did not control for previous mental health status, thus risking biased results (Harris, 2004).

The results of some studies and reviews accessed must be interpreted with caution as they are now dated. They were performed when accessing termination and the process itself were more arduous and socially less acceptable than current mechanisms, resulting in the procedure having greater impact psychologically.

The results of studies on psychological consequences are confounded by the cultural, religious and legal circumstances of the society in which the termination occurs. What may be acceptable in one country or even community may not be acceptable in another. In addition, the type of termination (medical or surgical) and reason for the procedure are among the factors that may affect psychological recovery.

Factors influencing negative psychological consequences

According to the evidence, some women are at greater risk of psychological disturbances than others and certain factors influence this.

A Norwegian mixed-method study of 80 women followed them up for two years with an interview, the Impact of Event Scale and a questionnaire about their feelings associated with the termination (Broen et al, 2005a). In Norway, as in some other European countries, a woman has an unconditional right to a termination before 12 weeks’ gestation. The authors found
that pressure from a male partner to have a termination had a negative psychological effect on the woman and was the strongest predictor of emotional distress at six months’ and two years’ follow-up.

In a study comparing mental health following termination with mental health following miscarriage, the authors found the mental health of women undergoing termination was poorer before the event (Broen et al, 2005b). They argue this could account for elevated anxiety of the termination group compared with the miscarriage group, which continued until the end of the five-year follow-up period.

Cozzarelli et al (1998) performed a study based on 615 women undergoing first-trimester surgical termination in the US. They found that women with a positive self-regard were better able to mobilise their social networks, which allowed them to cope more effectively post termination. Those with low self-esteem tended to be ineffective in seeking support from their partners and thus were left to cope after the procedure.

Low self-esteem, late-gestation termination, prior psychiatric illness and conflict with religious or cultural beliefs were all issues found to influence negative psychological outcomes following termination, in an Australian review. This summarised the international literature from a 30-year period between 1970 and 2000 (Bonevski and Adams, 2001).

Psychiatric disturbances

In an early study, Ashton (1980) interviewed 111 women before a surgical termination with eight-week and eight-month follow-up. There was a large drop-out rate, with only 22 women interviewed at eight months.

Of these, six reported persistent disturbances and all six were married and had been ambivalent about having the termination. GP records were accessed for 86 women at eight months and about 10% were found to experience serious psychiatric problems. However, these were short-lived and mainly resolved by eight or nine months after the termination.

This finding is echoed in a review, published a decade after Ashton’s study, of the preceding 20 years’ studies. The reviewers found that severe or persistent psychological disturbances were reported to occur in about 10% of women (Zolese and Blacker, 1992).

A comprehensive review by Thorp et al (2002) examining multiple effects following termination included 10 studies on subsequent mental health. The studies spanned 25 years from 1974 to 2000. Three large studies in the review examined almost 600,000 records and found an increase in the risk of suicide after termination. Three studies followed women up for 30 days and one (173,279 records) followed them up for 1-8 years. Thorp et al (2002) asserted that women contemplating a termination should be cautioned about an increased risk of self-harm or suicide. However, it could be argued that such a direct approach may be counterproductive at such a sensitive time.

Hess’ (2004) US phenomenological study found that some women who found the experience negative sought help and healing. This indicates that help should be made easily accessible to women at the time of their termination. The risk factors affecting psychological consequences are outlined to assist nurses in assessing those at risk undergoing a termination (Table 1)

Table 1. Risk factors 
Indicators to elicit risk of psychological effectsSource of evidence
  • Demographics - termination being in conflict with ethnic group, religion, socioeconomic group
Harris (2004); Bonevski and Adams (2001)
  • Foetal abnormality
Bonevski and Adams (2001)
  • Second trimester caused by delay in accessing services
Harris (2004)
  • Low self-esteem
Bonevski and Adams (2001)
  • Lack of social support
Major and Gramzow (1999); Cozzarelli et al (1998)
  • Difficulty making decision
Shusterman (1979)
  • Suicide in the family
Thorp et al (2002)
  • History of self-harm
Thorp et al (2002)
  • History of depression
Thorp et al (2002)
  • History of psychiatric illness
Broen et al (2005b); Bonevski and Adams (2001)
  • Undue influence from male partner
Broen et al (2005a); Pope et al (2001)

Anxiety and depression

The psychiatric disturbance in the 10% of women who underwent termination in Zolese and Blacker’s (1992) review was mainly in the form of anxiety and depression.

Bradshaw and Slade (2003) performed a critical review of the literature regarding emotional experiences following termination. Their review accessed post-1990 literature as they recognised that, culturally, attitudes have become more liberal over the past two decades. They found that levels of anxiety, depression and general distress decreased in the month following termination but the results of studies differed on the degree of the reduction. The better-quality studies suggested that 8-23% of women were experiencing high levels of general distress one month after their termination (Bradshaw and Slade, 2003).

Bonevski and Adams (2001) found no differences in distress between medical or surgical termination or in those undergoing termination compared with those who were refused. Of the 26 reviews they appraised, the researchers only found one that reported significant negative psychological effects, contradicting the conclusions of the other 25. A number of studies included in the review reported raised levels of grief in women having a termination because of foetal abnormality. They found no negative psychological effects in teenagers having a termination over and above those experienced by adult women (Bonevski nd Adams, 2001).

Coping with termination

The ways in which women cope psychologically with termination vary and, although qualitative studies cannot normally be generalised, a number have been included to add another dimension to the evidence.

A phenomenological study of 17 women found five themes that described the women’s journey from making the decision, coping with the memories, gaining perspective, seeking help and recognising its worth (Hess, 2004). Within these themes, there were negative and positive ways in which women coped following termination. These included acknowledging forgiveness, which hastened healing. ‘Making the foetus a person’ helped some work through their grief as well as appreciating that intense emotions continued years later.

Interestingly, another phenomenological study appears to contradict these findings as it found that persistent emotional upset was connected with a more human view of the foetus (Goodwin and Ogden, 2007). In a further phenomenological study involving women 15 years or more after their termination, ‘embodiment: giving form to the child’ was a theme raised by some women. Most women were able to recall the age the child would have been at the time of the study. This highlights the individual nature of qualitative findings and the fact such studies are not generally applicable. The hypothesis regarding the foetus as a person in these studies would benefit from testing in future quantitative research.

To enable coping, sensitive follow-up would be required during future gynaecological and obstetric care. First, it would be important to enable women to disclose their past termination by providing the right environment. Concealing their previous history within a healthcare setting could be detrimental to patients’ current care. However, many women conceal their circumstances from friends and family because of the shame associated with termination of pregnancy (Major and Gramzow, 1999). It is part of nurses’ and midwives’ roles to give women opportunities to work through any unresolved feelings, be it immediately after termination or during future pregnancies, smear tests or even menopausal care.

Positive outcomes

Although most research studies explore the negative psychological consequences of termination, it is worth noting that positive outcomes have been found to outweigh the harm, with women feeling more relief than negative or positive emotions after two years (Major et al, 2000). This echoes the findings of Shusterman’s (1979) study of 393 women undergoing termination, which found that women experienced favourable psychological consequences that outweighed negative ones.

A large prospective longitudinal study followed 13,000 UK women over 8-11 years (Gilchrist et al, 1995). The authors found that when previous psychiatric history was controlled for, psychiatric disorders were no higher following termination than following childbirth.

In the long term, Bradshaw and Slade’s (2003) review found that, over 10 years, women who had terminations did no worse psychologically than women who gave birth to wanted or unwanted children.

Supportive partners or parents have been found to improve psychological outcomes for women (Bonevski and Adams, 2001).

In a rather dated US prospective study (Jacobs et al, 1974), a sample of unmarried, predominantly black women of lower socioeconomic status showed a significant reduction in distress in most outcome measures four weeks following termination.

This study, along with others in this section, point to the conclusion that, while there is a risk of negative psychological consequences, such consequences could be minimal and transitory.

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2004) noted there is no causal link between termination and negative psychological consequences and that pre-existing conditions need to have been ruled out in making such assumptions. The recent RCN (2008) guidance on termination care reiterates RCOG (2004) guidelines in advocating post-termination counselling for those at risk of psychological difficulties.


The evidence found in this literature review suggests that a proportion of women would benefit from psychological support after termination. Based on the above findings, it would be reasonable to target assistance, in the first instance, towards those women who fit the criteria set out in Table 1.

If psychiatric disturbance occurs, it is likely to affect those at risk such as those with a previous history of psychiatric illness and depression. Having a termination for medical reasons, such as foetal abnormality or being unduly influenced in making the decision to abort, also seems to increase the risk of psychiatric disturbance, although such disturbances are often transitory in nature.

Eliciting the presence of these factors in a sensitive manner, preferably before the procedure, will help nurses to target women appropriately, ensuring that their post-termination care meets their needs in both the short and long term.

Targeting assistance would ensure that help is offered in a timely manner and at the appropriate level, while minimising the risk of prolonging the experience for those women who do not need psychological support and wish to move on.


Ashton, J. (1980) The psychosocial outcome of induced abortion. The British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; 87: 1115-1122.

Bonevski, B., Adams, J. (2001) The Psychological Effects of Termination of Pregnancy: a Summary of the Literature. Newcastle, Australia: Newcastle Institute of Public Health.

Bowling, A., Ebrahim, S. (2005) Handbook of Health Research Methods. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Bradshaw, Z., Slade, P. (2003) The effects of induced abortion on emotional experiences and relationships: a critical review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review; 23: 7, 929-958.

Broen, A.N. et al (2005a) Reasons for induced abortion and their relation to women’s emotional distress: a prospective, two-year follow-up study. General Hospital Psychiatry; 27: 1, 36-43.

Broen, A.N. et al (2005b) The Course of Mental Health After Miscarriage and Induced Abortion: a Longitudinal, Five-year Follow-up Study. London: BioMed Central.

Cozzarelli, C. et al (1998) Mental models of attachment and coping with abortion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology; 74: 2, 453-467.

Department of Health (2008) Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2007. London: DH.

Gilchrist, A. et al (1995) Termination of pregnancy and psychiatric morbidity. British Journal of Psychiatry; 167: 243-248.

Goodwin, P., Ogden, J. (2007) Women’s reflections upon their past abortions: an exploration of how and why emotional reactions change over time. Psychology and Health; 22: 2, 231-248.

Gray, J.M. (1997) Evidence-Based Health Care: How to Make Health Policy and Management Decisions. London: Churchill Livingstone.

Greenhalgh, T. (1997) How To Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence-based Medicine. London: BMJ Publishing Group.

Harris, A.A. (2004) Supportive counselling before and after elective pregnancy termination. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health; 49: 2, 105-112.

Hess, R. (2004) Dimensions of women’s long-term post-abortion experience. American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing; 29: 3, 194-198.

Jacobs, D. et al (1974) A prospective study on the psychological effects of therapeutic abortion. Comprehensive Psychiatry; 15;
5, 423-434.

Lipp, A. (in press, scheduled for publication in January 2009) Service provision for women undergoing termination of pregnancy: progress in Wales. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.

Major, B. et al (2000) Psychological responses of women after first-trimester abortion. Archives of General Psychiatry; 57: 8, 777-784.

Major, B., Gramzow, R.H. (1999) Abortion as stigma: cognitive and emotional implications of concealment. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology
; 77: 4, 735-745.

Pope, L. et al (2001) Postabortion psychological adjustment: are minors at increased risk? Journal of Adolescent Health; 29: 2-11.

RCN (2008) Abortion Care: RCN Guidance for Nurses, Midwives and Specialist Community Public Health Nurses. London: RCN.

Rorbye, C. et al (2005) Medical versus surgical abortion: comparing satisfaction and potential confounders in a partly randomized study. Human Reproduction; 20: 3, 834-838.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2004) The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion: Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 7. London: RCOG.

Shusterman, L.R. (1979) Predicting the psychological consequences of abortion. Social Science and Medicine. Part A: Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology; 13: 683-689.

Thorp, J. et al (2002) Long-term physical and psychological health consequences of induced abortion. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey; 58: 1, 67-79.

Zolese, G., Blacker, C. (1992) The psychological complications of therapeutic abortions. British Journal of Psychiatry; 160: 742-749.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!