Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Trust introduces 'live' patient feedback system


A hospital trust in the Midlands has become the first in the NHS to launch a real-time feedback system for patients, with comments posted directly to its website.

Patients, families and visitors to Birmingham Children’s Hospital Foundation Trust can use a free app on their smartphone to post their thoughts, complaints and compliments about the trust immediately.

If it proves a success the project could be a trailblazer for similar feedback applications, as part of a wider plan to increase the patient voice across the NHS.

The feedback app allows an anonymous message to be sent direct to the ward manager in charge who can then address any concerns raised. The message is also publicly displayed on the trust’s website.

Trust chief nursing officer Michelle McLoughlin, who has been leading the project said: “The app enables us to gather feedback in a way that our patients and families want to give it ,so we know immediately what we are getting right and what we need to improve to make their time with us the best it can be.

“Staff have embraced the technology and find it so rewarding to see the feedback from their patients and families and be able to respond straight away.”

She said the app was not a “gimmick” and other trusts could benefit from using it.

One of the trust’s ward managers, Sue Davies, added: “What I think is particularly good is that we can send a reply back to them quickly to acknowledge their comments and let them know what we have done in response.

“It shows that we take their views seriously and they don’t just disappear into a black hole.”

The app has been developed by Digital Life Sciences supported by NHS Midlands and East. It is expected to cost £100,000 over seven years.

It has been trialled on two wards but will now be rolled out across the trust.

The app also features a ratings function, as part of the national Friends and Family test, which allows the trust to analyse emerging themes or issues.

Messages are moderated as they go live on the hospital website to protect staff and patients, and to ensure medical details and offensive language are removed.

Since the project launched, the majority of messages posted have been positive about the trust.

Some have raised concerns including one parent who revealed a mix-up over medical notes involving two children with the same name.

They said: “I am now worried that this could have happened before. I would like all the notes to be checked.”

Another said they were “very disappointed” with the attitude of the triage nurse who the family felt did not listen and “objected to every word we said”.

A response posted a few hours later apologised and asked the family to contact the lead nurse.

Another post said the hospital was “let down badly by a poor planning and scheduling system” in its outpatients department that left families and children waiting too long.

One message typical of many said: “With all the news about NHS standards of care (Stafford hospital) I can only say the care you gave us is completely at the other end of the scale.

“The nursing staff in Ward 10 are exceptional in the lengths they go to administer care in what is a very demanding ward.”


Readers' comments (43)

  • michael stone

    Great !

    I've supported direct real-time patient feedback, as opposed to clinician-designed 'yes/no' questionnaires, ever since the 'family and friends' test cropped up !

    The faster this becomes more widely available than simply apps on smartphones, the better, in my opinion.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • what about the many, and especially the elderly or very ill, who don't or can't use a mobile phone? they are the ones most affected by bad care and do not all have somebody to speak out for them.

    re anonymous, how can a complaint be dealt with immediately by the ward manager if it is posted anonymously?

    furthermore anonymous seems to be ill perceive by many here!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Reinventing the wheel. Even at its worst ward 11 at mid staffs received and responded to real time feedback - they just responded inappropriately. All these ideas take time away from time to care. Is trying to get good feedback posted on the hospital screens really the way to nurse?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 22-Feb-2013 12:51 pm

    just another way of showing off your you have a smart phone!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • anthony clay

    Anonymous | 22-Feb-2013 12:51 pm

    But Mid Staffs didn't have the feedback from patients on open display, obviously - if those comemtns had been public domain, I'm pretty sure it would not ahve taken years to reach a peak !

    There should be a system to allow patients who do not have smartphones to post comments - as pointed out by Anonymous | 22-Feb-2013 12:36 pm.

    I am pondering over 'anonymous feedback' - this one is tricky, but I think you should somehow prove that either you or the relative commenting, was actually in the hospital, somehow ?

    But, as it says, this is 'a start' and to be refined if it seems to be effective, with luck.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    I sent an e-mail on jan 29th to the contact address in the F & F guidance the Nobody pointed me at - no reply so far, but this is my e-mail:

    Dear John,

    I was pointed at Gateway Reference 17990 during a discussion, in which the Family & Friends test cropped up.

    I’m not sure exactly what type of ‘feedback’ you personally are anticipated to receive as contact for that document, but I’m very interested in the concept of service users, evaluating ‘the less easily measurable’ aspects of NHS care. Amongst other things, it is possible that some things not greatly valued by professionals might be more highly valued by patients and relatives - however, if professionals design the question(s), those things would probably not be considered within it.

    So I myself, would be tempted to use a different type of question, that is harder to ‘collate’ but provides a more detailed answer:

    ‘We are interested in your experiences. If you feel that you would like to comment on anything particularly good, or particularly bad, that happened to you during your stay here, please explain that to us’

    or something similar.

    I’m interested to understand, why the current proposal seems to concentrate on easily-evaluated methodology, instead of potentially more informative ‘narrative’ feedback ? Admittedly one would need to evaluate action based on narrative feedback on a ‘it led to this change locally, and complaints subsequently dropped locally’ basis – but it does not necessarily follow that the easier-to-compare/collate types of feedback, are the most valuable/informative, surely ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sounds good. Can deal with general issues + concerns, but not specific ones as feedback is anonymous. Also no proof they are a patient or relative there.
    Friends + Family Test will give false positives, but I suspect people who implement that already knows. If negative feedback was given, frontline staff who are the ones asking these questions + doing their best, will be very upset + distracted, even if they are too professional to show it.

    Sooner or later privacy + confidentiality will be breached by patients or relatives, for naming others (patients, staff, locations, etc), reporting without permissions of those concerned, on conditions, treatments, videoing, recording, publicizing details through any feedback sites + social networks. Even if they hand write into notebooks, details may not be secure, and if mentions others they'll have a right not to be mentioned or to receive a copy of everything too.
    Frontline staff may feel like they're the ones under scrutiny for doing their job + subjected to harassment when someone thinks things should be done differently. If there's defensive practice now, it feels like it's only going to increase soon.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Oh but it was on open display - it was easily seen by relatives but the culture was such that it was ignored and because it was ignored staff came to see their behavior as acceptable and people were afraid of repercussions if they pushed it. A relative recently told me they were happy to fill in surveys about nurses because they were happy with us but threw the GP one away as they weren't happy and they thought it would cause problems even though it was anonymous. Its usually the most vulnerable who are reluctant to complain - and I can't see this happening with this system. Its just a way of satisfying a tick box that feedback is encouraged.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bringing smartphones, mobiles, notepads, makes it tempting for opportunistic thieves, in areas of high patient turnover + visiting relatives/friends, especially where there isn't enough staff.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 22-Feb-2013 4:43 pm

    I agree, even with anonymous paper feedback, some people were reluctant to complete + put it into the box themselves. It's not like voting papers where there's a code on every page, and anonymous can be identified to a registered individual (even if someone else fills it in).

    The most vulnerable + sickest patients generally aren't making the loudest noises and would also be reluctant to complain. I bet there been occasions where nurses have answered several call bells, a few to the same patient, only them to realise their quieter patient were deteriorating and only by luck caught it in time, while more bells were going off. I reckon the feedback there would be neglect of patients ringing the bell and not that a death was prevented.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page20 per page50 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.