By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Hike in number of trusts with concerns about 'financial resilience'

The number of NHS trusts referred to the health secretary over financial concerns has increased almost three-fold in a year, a report has revealed.

Nineteen were flagged up to Jeremy Hunt this financial year, compared with five in 2012-13, according to the Audit Commission.

Marcine Waterman, controller of audit at the NAO said auditors were reporting concerns about the financial resilience of a third of trusts this year, compared with a quarter for the previous 12-month period.

She added: “This level of reporting is worrying and reflects the increasing risks to the financial sustainability of individual NHS trusts as they continue to face sizeable financial pressures due to a rising demand for services and the necessary focus on quality of care, whilst balancing the need for continued cost savings.”

Among those referred to Mr Hunt for failing to meet their statutory break-even duty, were the University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals and Ipswich Hospital Trusts.

Mid Essex Hospital Services, North West London Hospitals and Worcestershire Acute Hospitals Trusts were also on the list.

The NAO report − entitled Auditing the Accounts 2013-14: NHS Bodies − covers the timeliness and quality of accounts, arrangements to secure value for money and auditors’ use of their statutory reporting powers at 101 NHS trusts and 211 CCGs.

It found timeliness and quality of trusts’ financial reporting had improved and that the majority of NHS bodies put in place proper arrangements for securing value for money.

But it also revealed that auditors at 34% of NHS trusts issued a non-standard value for money conclusion relating to concerns about financial resilience, compared to 26% last year.

Ten trusts, including North Cumbria University Hospitals and Croydon Health Services, received “adverse” conclusions, meaning the auditor was not satisfied the body had made proper arrangements to secure economy, efficiency and effectiveness in its use of resources.

 

Readers' comments (1)

  • The picture is fragmented as the 151 FTs are not inlcuded in this report - and one would imagine that part of the reason that the 74 trusts being audited in the report aren't FTs is that they've lacked financial stability to allow it. so it shouldn't be a big surprise to anyone. It's simple enough maths - increased demand against a background of significant funding cuts.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

newsletterpromo