Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Nearly all nurses reject NMC fee increase


Nurses have responded to a consultation on the proposal to increase their registration fee to £120 with almost total opposition.

The Nursing and Midwifery Council’s meeting today heard that approximately 20,000 nurses had responded to its consultation survey on increasing the fee from the current rate of £76 so far. A total of 98% of those rejected the rise.

The survey will continue until August 24, with the NMC expected to make a final recommendation of the fees change in September.

Meanwhile, an e-petition on a government website opposing the change has attracted more than 48,700 signatures. If it reaches 100,000, the issue could be debated in the Commons.

Unison’s head of nursing Gail Adams said the result was mirrored in the union’s own survey which had found a 94% rejection of the fee.

She said: “The strength of feeling was always going to be there.” She also predicted that the NMC would press ahead with the change anyway, which “made a mockery of [the] consultation”.

The embattled regulator, which was heavily criticised for failing “at every level” in a review of its capability earlier this month, has claimed the 60% hike is needed to pay for its core function of protecting the public through Fitness to Practise investigations.

The cost of the FtP process is expected to rise to £73m following a 52% increase in the number of referrals over the past two years.

The council meeting heard that in June, its increase in FtP action had meant that, for the first time, more cases were closed than were referred in June.

The meeting heard there had been a reduction of 59 cases in the NMC’s caseload, although it still has more than 4,000 on its books with an average length of investigation estimated at 12.8 months.

Acting chief executive Jackie Smith said: “We have to win back the confidence of the public and professionals and we need to deal with our internal culture.”

She said the council’s “resigned resilience culture” needed to be challenged, but that it would take time.


Readers' comments (22)

  • I cannot understand why this was put to consultation at all. if the fee has to increase, I would expect to see a justification for this circulated to us with a breakdown of how the monies are currently spent, the shortfall and what they would use the extra money for.
    They do not need to make the case that they cannot cope at present, everyoner else has identified that for them.
    We need to hear what they intend to do about it. The fiasco of the recruitment process has not helped.
    If the nurses say they do not want an increase, what then? Do they continue to pile up the debt?
    Asking people to spend more money is rarely likely to get wholehearted support but taken over the cost per week compared to basic nurse pay, it was not a huge increase. Other professional grouops have to pay more I suspect. I am concerned that unless the NMC can get it's act together that it will be "taken over" and run for us. We would not be regulating ourselves any more and could no longer claim to be a professional group. This used to be inmportant to nurses even if our pay does not reflect that staus or value to others.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have had contact with the NMC regarding correspondence they sent out to me regarding a referral for fitness to practice that was nothing to do with me but involved another member. I received a rather lack lustre response from them initially. After several frustrated messages which were not responded to I asked for an explanation of what had happened, what would be done to prevent similar happening again and also an apology for the distress caused by the mistake. I am still waiting. I have also been contacted in a rather haphazard manner about needing to attend a hearing. The communication process with the NMC can best be described (from my experience) as patchy and poor.

    If the rise in fees is to make sure that this is improved upon then fair play but as we have to pay this money then as outlined by anonymous previously this needs to be properly justified.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 20-Jul-2012 11:55 am

    'I am still waiting.'

    Don't hold your breath !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • why not spend the money investigating and addressing the reasons for so many FtPs in the first place before they even have the chance to go as far as an NMC trial. maybe better recruitment and training would be a more cost-effective, safer and satisfactory answer for all concerned.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am disappointed that nurses are being encouraged to oppose the fee increase. The CHRE report makes clear that it is the NMC's failure to increase the ARF that to some extent has led to all its current difficulties within FtP etc. The profession needs to recognise why they pay an ARF - to ensure high standards are achieved and maintained across the profession. A failure of the NMC can only demonstrate a failure of the profession as a whole.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Google gmc fees, see how much medics pay; which is more than we do, however the gmc explains exactly where the money goes. The HCPC charge £78 per year, which is reduced by 50% for the first two years after qualifying.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The NMC has just thrown away 62 k on a failed recruitment process to find a new head. Perhaps if the organisation wasn't in such a mess, nurses would be more willing to fund it. I'm not so sure self-regulation is what we have now or if it is a good idea. Look at the press, lawyers and other professionals who self-regulate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why bother with the consultation if they were going to change it anyway, why bother to ask our opinion?no really why? What do they do that's worth it anyway. All we get is a flimsy bit of card with outr pin number on it. Is that what I worked so hard for at university!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I don't see why our so called prime misinter David Cameron can't abolish this stupid fee as he did for teachers by abolishing the GTC.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous 10:14 a.m.

    In answer to your question maybe he knows that the teachers will and have gone on strike for what they want where as nurses............

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page20 per page50 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs