Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Close

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Formal warning for senior nurse who failed to report drug error

  • 20 Comments

A senior nurse at a nursing home where a frail elderly woman died following a medication mix-up has been given a formal warning.

Hazel Gillian Stears was the nurse-in-charge at Morfa Newydd Nursing Home in Flintshire when an 89-year-old woman, named locally as Gwen Cartlidge, was given the wrong medicine.

Mrs Cartlidge had been at the home for two days at the time, a tribunal heard.

The Nursing and Midwifery Council said Ms Stears was not responsible for the tragic error, but had “failed to act inappropriately” once it had been discovered.

“It sends a clear message to the public and the profession that such behaviour is not tolerated”

Naseem Malik

An NMC hearing in Cardiff was told the registrant failed to tell the pensioner’s family and GP, as well as not recording the mistake in her patient’s care notes.

A three-person panel ruled Ms Stears’ actions amounted to misconduct and her fitness to practise was impaired as a result.

However, it decided against taking the ultimate sanction and banning the registrant, who had an otherwise “unblemished” career record.

NMC panel chair Naseem Malik instead issued a caution order, which will stay on Ms Stears’ professional record for the next 12 months.

She said: “It is not alleged that Ms Stears was in any way responsible for the medication error, but she failed to act appropriately when she discovered that the medication error had occurred.

“Based on the evidence before it, the panel determined that a caution order was a fair and proportionate response,” she said.

“A caution order would satisfy the wider public interest in that it sends a clear message to the public and the profession that such behaviour is not tolerated,” said Ms Malik. “It was not in the public interest to restrict Ms Stears’ practice.”

The four-day NMC hearing was told that on 2 October, 2011, Ms Stears was the staff nurse of the upstairs section of Morfa Newydd Nursing Home.

At about 9am Mrs Cartlidge – referred to as Resident A by the NMC – needed help eating her breakfast.

The NMC was told that a care assistant went to see her and found a “number of tablets in a pot” on her table.

With the woman’s consent, the care assistant stirred the medication into the porridge and helped feed her.

But shortly after Ms Stears then came into the room with Resident A’s medication – and discovered the wrong prescription had been administered.

The medication she had been given belonged to an elderly man who lived in the downstairs section of Morfa Newydd.

Less than two hours later, Mrs Cartlidge became unwell and went back to bed.

“Resident A’s son visited just as staff had got her into bed,” noted panel chair Ms Malik.

“Ms Stears made no record of informing Resident A’s son that a medication error had occurred.”

The registrant then failed to inform the pensioner’s GP about the mix-up that same day – with doctors only discovering the mistake two days later when Mrs Cartlidge died on 4 October.

The panel said the evidence was enough to find Ms Stears’ misconduct had been proven.

It highlighted strict NMC guidelines saying nurses must “provide a high standard of practice and care at all times” and added the home’s policy on administration errors were “unclear”.

Ms Malik added: “Ms Stears had failed to provide Resident A with a level of care reasonably expected of a registered nurse – therefore exposing Resident A to unwarranted risk of harm.”

“Ms Stears has demonstrated her remorse as well as insight into the incident”

Naseem Malik

Following the misconduct ruling, it then also decided her fitness to practise was impaired as a result.

However, the NMC described the incident an “isolated” one on Ms Stears’ otherwise “unblemished career”. It listed two “aggravating factors” in the case, but five mitigating ones.

Ms Malik said; “Resident A was an elderly lady whose condition was extremely frail at the time of her transfer to the home…(but) Ms Stears made early admissions to the charges, the incident was isolated relating to one patient (and) Ms Stears has demonstrated her remorse as well as insight into the incident.”

The panel also noted the home was a “challenging” one where drug procedures “appeared to vary”.

Ms Malik added: “The panel concluded that, in all the circumstances, the misconduct in this case was at the lower end of the spectrum of impaired fitness to practise.

“Furthermore, the panel did not consider that there was any evidence of general incompetence or specific areas of Ms Stears’ practice in need of assessment or retraining,” she said.

“The panel was satisfied that a caution order, in this respect, would keep in the forefront of Ms Stears’ mind that she needs to be aware of the conduct expected of a nurse.”

The caution order will stay on Ms Stears’ record for one year. It means the registrant will have to disclose the formal warning to any current or future employer about the sanction for the next 12 months.

It is still unknown how the medication mix-up occurred – and whether the mistake was caused by staff or another patient.

The Morfa Newydd Nursing Home was last inspected by the Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales in September 2013. Its report identified a number of areas needing improvement.

  • 20 Comments

Readers' comments (20)

  • michael stone

    'The Nursing and Midwifery Council said Ms Stears was not responsible for the tragic error, but had “failed to act inappropriately” once it had been discovered.'

    An 'in' too far, surely ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am sorry to learn of the situation and pain and suffering for patient, family, nurse, and facility.

    When I read stories like this I have lots of questions about staffing and resources that involve organizational accountability along with the nurse's.

    This post helps to explain my reasoning.

    "Shortcuts in Medication Administration: Why Do We Do It Wrong If We Know How to Do It Right? (and We Do!)" http://bit.ly/1g8N0Rg

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We know the level of responsibility is high,
    It is suggested by the NMC, Nursing Care Managers:
    Have implied responsibility.
    Regards all issues within the workplace,
    Also, It has been stated and suggested in past cases, Even when not personally on Duty.
    I welcome more guidance, and debate here The fact serving Police officer's, have less duty of care, then Health workers, is an muted point, beyond reasonable doubt, 100% or balance of probability, 51%

    Is it time for a change, YES, we need to educate and be open to change and learn by are mistakes, embrace them own them.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Much of the tragedy is contained in this sentence: "It is still unknown how the medication mix-up occurred – and whether the mistake was caused by staff or another patient."

    ref: http://www.ctlab.org/documents/A%20Tale%20of%20Two%20Stories.pdf



    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "failed to act inappropriately"? So, this nurse failed to do the 'right thing' which would have been appropriate, or failed to do the 'wrong thing' which would have been inappropriate? Confusing. Sounds like the nurse who discovered, was alerted about the administering nurse's medication error but did not take 'appropriate' action to follow up on the error. Therefore, the senior (presiding head nurse) did not follow hospital policy regarding medication errors--and by failing to act was 'inappropriate' in her duties.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It seems that this frail lady was killed by a gross fatal error. Then surely some one was responsible and accountable here she did not do this to herself. How can such a lot of errors occur at one time and be excusable. This is wrong on so many levels.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We need to understand why the wrong patient's medication was in the ladies room to start with. My understanding is that medication should only be signed for once it has been given/administered and this instance calls into question administration of medication policy in this nursing home. Perhaps the CQC should look at this standard by carrying out an inspection there.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The report says "senior nurse." This unfortunate nurse was a "staff" nurse. Since when was a "Staff nurse" senior? when the only other staff are untrained HCA's perhaps? In every trust I have worked in "staff" nurses are not senior, and have little management experience.

    Due to the "leniency" of the judgement, there are obvious flaws in the homes staffing and management system.

    And why haven't the 5 mitigating circumstances in the case been reported? Is it that there would then be sympathy with the poor staff nurse involved who now has the weight of all this on her shoulders? Is it because the finger would then be pointed at the poor management practice of the nursing home?

    This appears to be a terrible accident in which one staff nurse has been hung out to dry and now has to bear this burden on her shoulders for life. My heart goes out to her as well as the family of the unfortunate lady.

    Take this article as a warning shot. The journalism will always be heavily weighted against the nurse.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    I'm guessing - and only guessing - that:

    'Mrs Cartlidge had been at the home for two days at the time, a tribunal heard.'

    might have something to do with this ?

    If staff are busy, and 'something is new/changed' then that does presumably increase the risk of this type of mistake happening.

    And although this type of thing has to be prevented from happening, I do agree that this expectation that the senior nurse 'oversees everything' is at times an impossible expectation.

    However, she was - from the title - only 'formally warned': she wasn't struck off (and the NMC, which is far from perfect, does need to be seen to be trying to prevent patient harm: which was a death in this case - the NMC cannot just 'ignore' that the unfortunate lady dies, can it ?).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I administered a wrong drug noticed by relatives. Informed my superior, notified GP on call, completed incident form and monitored patient. Nothing more was said.
    Sorry, if this nurse knew the wrong medication had been given then she is to be held responsible for the demise of this patient if it was found to be caused by the medication error.
    I think she was very lucky to be let off so lightly.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 1020results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.