Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


'NMC is out of touch with the profession'


The winter nights are drawing in now the clocks have gone back, but that’s not the only cause of gloom.

The winter nights are drawing in now the clocks have gone back, but that’s not the only cause of gloom. The Nursing and Midwifery Council’s registration fee will now go up from the current level of £76 to £100, instead of the £120 proposed in May.

The fact that the NMC council took two hours to deliberate over whether to accept the £20m government bailout or make registrants pay all of the rise it originally called for, indicates that council members are somewhat out of touch with what’s really happening in nursing.

They should know better. Pay and conditions are being eroded, as Nursing Times reporter Shaun Lintern exclusively reveals. And although it contains some wins - sticking to Agenda for Change on the whole, it concedes to the scrapping of enhanced out-of-hours sick pay.

The draft deal on NHS workers’ pay, terms and conditions has been described as “the least worst option”.

And nurses are still facing yet another year of a real-terms pay cut - as even the 1% rise that’s been mooted by the government will be well below the rate of inflation.

The NMC’s own consultation on the fee hike informed it that 5% of registrants would leave the profession if they were forced to pay the increased fee rise of £120. How could it ignore this strong evidence that such a hefty increase would cause an exodus of experienced nursing talent?

How could they possibly think there was any other option but to accept the government’s help that the unions had been lobbying so hard for?

Some have raised eyebrows at the government bailout, suggesting that registrants should be wary of losing their independent
regulator. But, frankly, with the government breathing down the neck of the NMC heavily last year and this, and then calling in the heavies in the shape of the Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence to scrutinise what had been going on behind closed doors at the regulator - I think that ship of independence had long sailed.

The NMC has failed its members - it admitted as much in its press conference this summer. Now it needs to turn the tanker around - get its fitness to practise cases into a manageable order and manage its fi nances with the care and propriety that it demands from registrants. All eyes are watching.


Readers' comments (21)

  • Can't say this is any sort of news frankly. The NMC lost all credibility and the respect of everyone a long time ago. I guess they are simply seeing how much money they can make out of hard-up nurses so they can give themselves pay rises (probably ten times more than any nurse will get) and make Portland house even more luxurious. The NMC make me feel sick and I am currently deciding whether I can continue in a career where the governing body does what it likes, when it likes.
    Personally, I don't think the NMC should be Independent as those running it have shown year on year that they are incapable of doing so. Yes, it should be Independent but not when those people who accept that they have failed the nursing profession are still in charge. I can only see things getting worse and worse and next year, despite what they have said, we should be prepared for another huge hike (above what they have agreed on) on the back of some imaginary figures and fallacies.
    Nursing is in a dark period at the moment with redundancies, cuts and wage freezes...not to mention everybody is seemingly against us....we have ineffective unions and the NMC are just not capable of anything. I think now is the time to get out of the profession that I love and have sacrificed a lot for and look for a new career

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Susan Markham

    Jolly good editorial Jenni but I think the headline is slightly wrong....

    Instead of 'NMC is out of touch with the profession' you should have put 'NMC is out of touch with the real world' because that's where most of us live.

    We have bills to pay, faces to feed and nothing left to save at the end of the month.

    It's not a dig at you.

    I always remember Maggie's run-up to the election of 79. She said "Of course I know how to run the economy, I am a housewife who has had to budget the family income for years..."

    Hokay... considering that her husband was a millionaire... that's probably not such a good example.

    In fact NT - Can I get a "do again?"

    Can I?


    OK - so it seems that's a NO...

    The point is that we have all had to downsize our spending and expectations in the last five years... personally speaking I gave up cocaine suppositories, staying at the Hilton and trashing the room, mainlining fossilised turtle faeces, jetting around the world in my personal submarine and eating caviare on toast...

    So why can't the NMC also trim its budget?

    In fact... as a regulatory body... what does the NMC do that the UKCC didn't already do at half the price?

    Be honest, paying the NMC is like saying "here's a load of dosh - now beat me up"... Oh wait... that's exactly what happened in the Clint Eastwood film "Dirty Harry"...

    But nowadays Clint just talks to empty chairs... The NMC's got one of those too!

    What a coincidence!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well I don't agree with Susan - this is not a good editorial at all. It misses the point that the NMC closely with a Royal College have overseen the real demise of a profession which captured the words 'care, dignity and compassion' in its code and it's practices.

    The NMC have destroyed the nurse education process by its stupid Project 2000 which was a pilot that they did not evaluate.
    The ambitious nurses and the trade union nurses saw an opportunity here to feather their nests, create huge pre-reg university departments which did not deliver this true nature of nursing; and the RCN - the so called trade union pushed hard on terms and conditions and supporting bad nurses maintain their status and power. The RCN destroyed its professional status (the art and science of nursing) and now oversees the odd campaign when the media gets too interested in bad practice.
    What they both should have been doing is lobby and try to alter the way the managerial model in the NHS demoted nursing practice and destroyed its core value to patients.

    I absolutely despair - quite a few of us shouted very loud between the late eighties and 2000 but all to no avail.
    At the end of the day being the lead in the RCN and the NMC was about salary and a power trip.

    Wales took a brave decision to produce a nursing degree but sadly did not have the quality and number of leaders to make it become so different in quality from the rest of the UK. This was because the NMC had a such a poor lead for the right content and process of pre-reg and did not monitor the delivery in the way it should.

    I know that some people will say that it is no good looking back but isn't nursing practice about reflecting and changing.

    Come on - someone set up an alternative to the RCN which concentrates on the real art and science of nursing and not pander to its members and promote bad practice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Adedapo Haastrup

    Why should we pay £100 when the Council members are highly incompetent unreliable and unsupportive of registants. I think its time for a revolt.I am sure Nurses who have been treated unfairly by The Council should and will support my views .We pay so much already any way why should we pay more?We a Nurse is faced by difficult situations and circumstances the very Council we've been paying so much to will be so swift to turn such Nurses into scape- goats,whether found guilty or not guilty.So comrades I say,WHY PAY MORE?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have to agree with anonymous about the damage the NMC has done to nurse education. You only have to read a students placement document to see there is nothing but abstract principles for mentors to assess. Not so sure about the RCN but the NMC is a disgrace.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Many of the problems faced by the NMC in the past and which it continues to face are due to poor management both at council and senior staff level. Many of the managers are still there perhaps in different roles and until that is remedied perhaps we wont see much change in the public face of the NMC. However a key fact of the NMC's failings over the years is that it has spent too much time misunderstanding its role as a statutory regulator - it exists to protect the public not the nursing and midwifery profession. This is emphasised by this editorial refereing to the NMC's members as opposed to their correct term of registrant. Its FtP function is failing in large part because there is insufficient funds available - the need to increase the fee level is long overdue. If Nurses are concerned about paying this fee, they should take a look at the fee levels imposed on dental nurses and their salaries (higher and lower respectively). The time for self regulation within the NMC is long over which is unfortunate as this should be highly valued by registrants.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 31-Oct-2012 1:35 pm

    The way that the NMC has conducted ftp hearings is an absolute disgrace. There is and has always been plenty of money to carry out this function. But it has been carried out in a wasteful and grossly inefficient manner. The NMC itself has been mired, (for years), in a culture of bullying and intimidation. Read any CHRE report in recent years for evidence. The NMC is not fit for purpose and has not been for a very long time. Scrap it and start again with an effective regulatory body. Then talk to us about fees.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Susan Markham
    Cocaine suppositories. Suppose that explains why you are always talking out of your arse

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • project 2000 has very little to do with the nmc. It had everything to do with removing a culture of nursing that was not academic. You may have felt that your training was complete but a brief look at nursing worldwide showed precisely the opposite. In fact it is only because nursing is in universities that it can attract people who don't have the urge to do it. It is this kind of old fashioned thinking that keeps up out of the protective cushion of professionalism. That is was taught by those who thought it inferior immediately doomed it. It was far from perfect but it was better than the sexually orientated apprenticeships of the past. If the old style of training was so good why was it replaced? That said, of course the NMC is out of touch- however they can rely on our divisiveness to reap our cash whilst we squabble and do nothing useful whilst we whine over which obviously inferior style of training was/is the best. Their detachment from us is nothing more than your detachment from them and the real issues within our sphere.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 1-Nov-2012 1:35 am

    Susan Markham
    Cocaine suppositories. Suppose that explains why you are always talking out of your arse

    I could not agree more! Maybe you Susan should be taken to FtP as I am sure cocaine impairs your Fitness to Practice...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page20 per page50 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.