Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Close

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

'In their late sixties, how will nurses keep up with the demands of the job?'

  • Comments (30)

The debate about whether the country can afford to pay public sector pensions will, I’m sure, continue to rage long after the current dispute is resolved. And I doubt some sections of the media will ever stop referring to them as ‘gold-plated’.

But I’d like to take a step back from the politics, and look at the practicalities. So let’s try to disregard the fact that people are being asked to work longer and pay more in order to receive less (go on - I know it’s hard, but do try).

There are some basic issues that make the ever-rising retirement age simply unworkable for a huge proportion of public sector workers – and nurses in particular.

As they work on into their mid and late sixties, how are nurses expected to keep up with the demands of the job? They can have access to hoists, sliding boards and other equipment to move patients, but even so, many other aspects of the job make it hard physical work.

Will there be a division of labour so younger nurses take on the heavy work and older ones are given light duties? I can see that playing out well on the wards.

And while ageing doesn’t have to equate with ill health, I’m only too aware myself that it is associated with a certain amount of unavoidable physical decline. A lot of it is manageable if irritating if you’re deskbound – the aching knee means you don’t bother going out at lunchtime, and I sometimes think a reduction in my hearing ability wouldn’t be all bad when a colleague bellows across the office while I’m trying to proofread.

But I’m lucky, my job doesn’t require me to walk miles a day, and hearing loss would mean I’d only miss out on an unwanted opinion rather than a plea for help from a frail patient. Working until 68 is unlikely to cause me much physical damage – although I’d probably benefit from having someone responsible for finding my glasses every time I leave them on a printer or someone else’s desk.

I suspect the working conditions of those who make decisions about how long people can be expected to continue nursing are more like mine than they are like yours.

Maybe Mr Osborne should spend a week working as a healthcare assistant. After all, you’re expected to ensure patients can make informed decisions, so surely politicians should be enabled to do so too?

  • Comments (30)

Readers' comments (30)

  • With regards to that last paragraph: hear, hear!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • John Howes

    I retired in June this year at the age of 66. I was working in a large Critical Care Unit. I had reduced my hours after returning from the USA where I was working in a 24 bed SICU (Surgical Intensive Care Unit). My decision to go part time was to some extent to allow me more time to play Golf. It was not the physical or the Academic side of nursing that began to press on me. It was more the idea that my last years in the profession, at the bedside would be memorable. As a result of increased Trade Union activism I became acutely aware of the decline in standards, more so on the wards than in my own department. Much of my discontent came from the slick verbal performances of managers who appear to have developed a lingua franca about patient care that dismisses concern as a form of ignorance of the broader issues. Any attempts to raise concerns were usually suppressed, often subtly other times brutally less so. When Chief Execs are silenced, as in Lincoln then there is little chance that the lower echelons will be heard, if you have spent most or all of your adult life in nursing then those 60+ year olds still in practice recognise that whatever they had learned over the years was progressively less welcome. It's not age that stops most of the 60 +'s who still practice it's attitude!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous

    with all due respect to older nurses of which I would have been one had I not given up in my mid-50s, is that we, and older colleagues I have observed in the workplace are physically (and sometimes mentally as well) too slow on hectic acute medical and other acute wards to keep up with the pace of work compared to younger team members, find it harder to grasp some of the complex changes and new hi tech quickly enough (especially when it goes wrong and there is nobody else around to ask for assistance) and find it more difficult to recuperate between very late followed by very early shifts, and readjusting between long night shifts and day shifts when there is not enough time off in between for one's personal body clock to readjust such as finishing in the morning of a series of nights and then be expected to start on an early shift the following morning! the heavy lifting, sometimes alone of very heavy patients with or without mechanical aids can also be highly problematic.

    Once in a new job, when I asked for help from other staff on the same shift with a transfer of a heavy and immobile patient, I was told I could do it on my one. When I said I did not wish to injure my back I was told by my boss that all the nursing staff had bad backs (despite them all having been on a recent course where they were trained to mobilise heavy patients on their own)! we soon parted company after this as I wished to remain fit so as to be able to look after and enjoy my house and garden in retirement! At this time I was also recovering from an accident where I had been on crutches for three months and still had a very swollen ankle by midday and was severely reprimanded for not running fast enough on the stairs to answer an alarm bell to which everybody else had run at the same time and which turned out to be a false alarm. At that point my GP who also had patients at the clinic and had heard rumours about me extended my sick/accident leave until I got the sack for a prolonged absence and not being accepted by the team! That in my mid-50s was sadly my last job but at least I am still fit enough to attend to my garden and other physical activities.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous

    Further to my above comment, where there is no allowance for editing or additions, I just wonder how cost effective it will be allowing nurses to work on the wards for so much longer and whether, in the long run any money will be saved from paying their pensions at a much later stage. I do not wish to criticise older nurses with their long and highly valuable experience and the excellent standard of care they are able to provide (possibly at a slower pace which is not a negative for their patients as they probably pay more attention to detail as well) but I have the feeling that quality and safety (to nursing staff as well as patients) are of little concern to the government.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous

    I suspect the g'ment are expecting that many nurses will retire before they reach their late 60s due to the demands of the job and concern of their own longevity. This is turn would mean fewer staff reaching their maximum pension potential, thus leading to less pension payouts - a double wammy!!Young nurses, think on, you will become the older nurses one day. You need to think about what it will mean for you in the future. Good luck, I don't envy you.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tinkerbell

    Anonymous | 10-Dec-2011 0:24 am

    Exactly! Some of the ageing workforce will be older than the elderly patients they are caring for, and the younger nurses will be trying to support both their patients and their ageing colleagues. They are going to get worn out even sooner. What a joke.

    Those nurses who retire sooner will have to make the choice between looking after themselves or collapsing on the job. Talk about flogging a dead horse. I know the choice i will make if i can. I wish i still had the bounce back i had 10 years ago but as we get older the wear and tear kicks in, the daily repetitive strain injuries from moving and handling takes its toll on backs, knees, shoulders and neck. Some of our staff have had surgery for knees, shoulders etc., as have been doing elderly care longer than I and some are younger than me.

    I have only worked in elderly care for the past 7 years, previously working with young adults, but sometimes feel the demands of the manual labour involved every day leaves me totally knackered on my days off. It's not something that happens overnight but a slow, progressive onset from the daily grind. In an effort to help myself i am reducing my hours next april otherwise i am going to be too tired and knackered to enjoy any days off, retirement or end up on an elderly ward as a patient myself. Working an office job until 65 does not compare to working full on as a nurse on the frontline until 65 or more, same for firemen, paramedics and every other manual labour job in the public sector. Come on tory bods, do just one week in hands on nursing, experience it for yourselves and see if you relish the idea of working until 65 or longer but as you don't really care about the NHS anyway its all pretty academic.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous

    I have just been compulsory retired on the grounds of age- 67 years. I am fit- healthy- very active- had a lower sick record than my colleagues and was hard working. I enjoyed my work. One should be given the choice- if you are fit and professionally capable, why not work, but i admit that it is not for everyone. Leave the choice to the individual, although I accept that managers would prefer not to employ mature staff as they tend to be vocal as they have been there and done that.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous

    I see an increase in retirement on the grounds of ill health and a detrimental effect on morale as people will not want to move out of their senior positions before retirement. It really will be dead men's shoes.

    There are a finite amount of jobs, what is the point of older people staying in work when younger ones can't even get jobs. Benefits of pensions - they all use public money.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous

    What a terrible article by Ann Shuttleworth. Has the Nursing Profession now become ageist? Seems you would advocate "putting down" nurses who reach 65, or is it 60, or 50. Perhaps everyone should retire at 29, thus not becoming a middle aged nurse!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous

    I don't think Nursing is ageist - with the increase of the retirement age these things need to be discussed. I PERSONALLY CANNOT BEAR THE THOUGHT OF WORKING INTO MY 60'S! I agree that people should be given the choice but I also think that this increase in the retirement age will mean fewer jobs and opportunities for the younger workforce.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.