Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Sarah Kendal: 'Media attacks on nurses are unfair'


The idea that university education erodes the compassion out of student nurses is ludicrous, argues Sarah Kendal

Apparently, nurses lack compassion. To address the problem, the chief nursing officer (CNO), has launched Compassion in Practice, a strategy to restore the nursing values of compassion, care, competence, communication, courage and commitment. She has been present in the media, tactfully responding to journalists who tell her that the root of the problem is nurses having a university education. She has rightly argued that while compassion is the current issue, nurses need real depth of knowledge to deliver care in a complex, rapidly changing environment.

Is it so shocking that a nurse should go to university?


“The everyday lunacies facing NHS staff can be like a surreal comedy”

I have always thought it a strange idea that university education might stop someone from being kind. In her blog, “Nurses need compassion, not a degree”, journalist Christina Odone scoffs at a previous CNO initiative focusing on nurses’ confidence. Odone argues:

“Who needs a ‘confident practitioner’ when they’re lying immobile on a hospital bed, dying (literally) of thirst because “a confident practitioner” is ignoring their calls for water? Who needs a “confident practitioner” when they’re soaked in their own urine because their pleas for fresh linen have gone unanswered?”

Of course, we need compassionate nurses. But haranguing the profession is hardly the answer. We know enough about human behaviour to understand that being supportive to a person helps them to be supportive to others. Kindness breeds kindness. And constant criticism is unlikely to generate compassion.

It is hard to deliver the high standards of care that a patient deserves, if resources of time, skill, equipment, opportunity, energy and so on are lacking. The everyday lunacies facing NHS staff can be like a surreal comedy. Purchasing decisions are made by people who do not understand what they are buying; space is organised by people who do not know how many patients will need to sit down at one time; expensive equipment is delivered to the wrong department, or abandoned in a holding area because no one knows it has arrived. Such situations are rarely created by clinical nurses and these nurses usually have very little influence over them.

Shorter inpatient stays mean constant admission and discharge, with few patients on a ward who are not acutely ill. Overcrowding and rapid throughput increases the risk of infection. Low morale contributes to sickness and staffing problems. Relying on agency nurses puts a greater onus on the permanent staff who are assigned to each shift. With regard to providing emotional comfort to patients, work is often organised so that the few qualified staff do the work that only they can do, and other work, such as personal care, falls to other staff (who are also under pressure).

How then can poor care be attributed to university education?

The idea that university education erodes the compassion out of student nurses is ludicrous. Across the UK, nursing curricula are designed, written, approved and studied by people who are passionate about the nursing values outlined in the CNO’s strategy.

Blaming nurses is easy, but unfair. What we do need to attend to is the context that nurses work in. Responsibility for this sits with the lines of management that can be traced from ward managers to the cabinet office. In a way, nurses are carrying a message about contemporary health politics. Please don’t shoot the messengers.   

Sarah Kendal is lecturer in School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester


Readers' comments (67)

  • please let's not have another debate about degre vs degree nurses. not another 'too posh to wash' argument surely - mind you it did result in some very amusing ditties.

    the problem many people have is that nursing is difficult to get into now, that is why we don't agree it should be a degree course, there are many people without academic qualifications that would make great nurses.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The current crisis, if that is what we are calling it, has absolutely nothing to do with the level of education of our nurses.

    It has everything to do with the culture within which we work.

    Compassion and culture are the responsibility of everyone within an organisation and ultimately, the buck stops at the top.

    We need to stop the bullying behaviour that filters down from the DH to Trusts via the various channels and from there to Matrons and ward managers.

    We need to be unafraid of knocking the negative stories straight on the head, if care was as bad as some of the media stories made out at the level they make it out to be, then hardly anyone would emerge from any kind of treatment or hospital stay unharmed.

    The reality is, far more people get good care but we chose not to highlight this but instead allow the negative stories to become the whole story.

    Of course, when things go wrong we need to do something about it, but the problem is no-one wants to pay for the solution, which is more people to deliver safe and quality care.

    Keep on cutting posts and demoralising nurses (and others) by downgrading posts will only make it worse. As the author rightly says, people who know they are valued are more likely to be able to then value others. It's not rocket science, its basic human need.

    Forget the superflous arguements, the real campaign needs to highlight the impact of cuts on quality of care and hold those to account who are not listening, not the nurses who are trying really hard but quite understandably, sometimes don't quite pull it off.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    'The everyday lunacies facing NHS staff can be like a surreal comedy.'

    I was confronted by 'lunacy', albeit probably far from 'everyday', when my mother died - it afflicts patients and relatives, as well as NHS staff.

    But ignoring The Mail (my usual policy), there are so many angered relatives (often bereaved) 'out there', that something must be triggering that anger on a fairly significant scale.

    I know that a lot of problems are down to too few staff, and obviously annoyed people make more noise than the more-satisfied ones: also, blaming nurses for things outside of their control isn't the solution, but sweeping the problem under the carpet by downplaying its prevalence won't help in its elimination, will it ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • yes realy, Nurse should strive for thier profession.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hi.
    After 22 years as a nurse I took on a degree course which I successfully completed 6 years ago.
    One thing education has taught me is that change is urgently needed in the NHS.
    It appears that a lot of old school staff
    are frightened of change, and as such do things as they have always done them, right or wrong. i.e. lack of modern education?????
    So in my opinion everyone in nursing should be compelled to take a certain amount of modern education, whether a degree or whatever.
    As for compassion, I obviously cannot speak for others, but I would not be in nursing if I lacked compassion.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Many people enjoy good outcomes from the NHS equally some have to endure the most apalling standards of care.

    The most recent involves midwives who failed to recognise a probem , did not seek medical assistance resulting in the death of a baby.

    We all I hope remember the horrors of the Stafford debacle. There was the case invoving a young man with diabetes insipidus killed as a result of ignorance and neglect

    Iam sure anyone reading this can add to the list without difficulty.

    The ongoing debate about the LCP would appear to have its roots firmy planted in health care professionals arrogance and refusal to undertake essential communication

    All of these issues when combined with persistant reports of the "neglect" of older patients will, not surprisingly generate adverse media comment. Relatives will fear for the well being of their family members. They will be vigelent and critical of care which fails to meet expectations.

    The profession has got a problem which needs to be acknowledged.

    Much of the difficulty is associated with unrealistic work loads and the admission of elderly demented people to unsuitable wards which are not staffed to met the needs of this highly dependent group of patients.

    So as individuals what do you do about the probem? Do you always report inadequate staffing levels?

    Have you telephoned the CQC "whistle blowing" service to report the risk your patients are being exposed to?

    Do you demand assistance from your trade union or professional organization?

    Remember when it all goes wrong it is you who will be blamed. Senior managers (including Directors of Nursing and their office bound flunkies) will dodge criticism but you as a disposable RN will find yourself exposed and said to be in need of futher training!

    Wake up and take the initatve for your own well being and that of your patients.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    Jenny Jones | 21-Dec-2012 2:31 am

    Yes, I agree with your post. There seem to be endless problems generated by what you described as:

    'The ongoing debate about the LCP would appear to have its roots firmy planted in health care professionals arrogance and refusal to undertake essential communication'

    and as well as resourcing issues, there are singificant issues around decision making, and clinicians failing to adopt an 'us & us' attitude instead of a fairly common 'us & them' attitude - this is, of course, getting into the discussion about 'culture change'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's the persistent negative criticisms by the media that encourages people to attack nurses. The constant barrage of negativity is one of the fastest ways of reducing morale + compassion in staff who work very hard, in challenging situations, with limited resources.
    If there's no higher training + education standards, we would accept whatever treatment is prescribed, not questioning if its right, wrong , uptodate, safe or effective. If asked 'what do you think?' the reply might be 'dunno, not enough knowledge to be useful, got basic training, but I can empathise, deliver care, tlc + show you compassion. Can't find more experienced / knowledgeable nurses to help as they've all quit, retired, off sick, mostly on day shifts, or the few about are already stretched. Doctors, also hard to find + already busy too, some knowing less than nurses, consultants are limited + practice other specialisms and most of them 'won't know you or your case'. Is there anything I can do, that I can competently + safely do to help while im here?'
    Imagine telling any other profession, eg physicians, surgeons, lawyers, teachers, pharmacists, physios, etc, that they don't need a degree level education, just more compassion in their work to people they're looking after. If anything we all need further + continuing development. Grade + academic levels inflation, from Gcses to post-doctorate level, has been happening for years, to make it tougher for applicants, + for employers 'to recruit the best'

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If much training is not required, can Cameron et al, chief execs + directors, refresh themselves by spending 2 weeks as an auxiliary delivering frontline care + compassion, and show us amateurs how's it done. Please practice what you preach.

    We don't get bonuses to wipe up poo, d+v, + mopped up pee off patients to prevent + reduce risks of infection, we do it as we do care, have compassion. But a fat-cat yearly bonuses would really help and might see a positive culture change.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • it is curious that nurses trying to do their jobs to the best of their ability with limited and often very poor quality resources have received so much negative and often venomous press whereas bankers, who have caused immeasurable scandals bringing the whole global economy to its knees, putting many of its citizens, often through no fault of their own, under equally immeasurable stress, with more scandals being revealed almost daily, carry on almost unscathed by the press.

    sorry in haste, poor grammar, but I think the sentiments are quite clear.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.