By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Seven days in

So I’ve been the editor of Nursing Times for a whole week, and it’s been a pretty eventful one.

First up, was press day, which brought some interesting insights from my news team about the Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria being found in hospital sinks, which the Department of Health has set up a working group to look into. Infection control in hospitals is clearly an issue that hits the headlines more times than Katie Price, so it’s imperative that nurses and all healthcare professionals seek to eradicate the cause. The latest thinking is that it’s a design fault with taps. Clearly, we’ll keep you posted here at Nursing Times.

Monday brought in a host of talented teams to our offices in London, as the final category of our Nursing Times Awards was judged – Team of the Year. It gave me a chance to chat to some of the luminaries on the judging panel – Gail Adams of Unison, which is sponsoring this category, Mandie Sunderland of Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust and Firas Sarhan of Bucks New University, as well as meet the outstanding teams.

Team is an interesting one because everything nurses do is about teamwork, and having the skills to collaborate, communicate and seamlessly handle patient care from one department to another or one nurse to another is essential. We saw plenty of those skills in evidence in our boardroom on Monday, and the judges had a tough time picking a winner. From seeing all the entrants together, you could see that they were respectful of each other but enjoyed great camaraderie, and that those relationships had delivered great innovation and, most importantly, improvements in their patients’ experiences, staff morale and clinical outcomes. My lips are sealed about the results until November 3, but if you want to know who scoops this trophy and all 13 others, you’ve got to book your ticket to the Nursing Times Awards at the Hilton in Park Lane on November 3. See nursingtimesawards.co.uk for details.

Yesterday I headed up to the Cancer Care Congress at Manchester, organised skilfully by emap networks by Nursing Times with our sister magazine Health Service Journal.

Professor Mike Richards of the Department of Health

Professor Mike Richards of the Department of Health

Much of the buzz was about the White Paper, its impact on GPs, nurses and all of the healthcare profession, but also on refreshing the Cancer Reform Strategy. While Professor Mike Richards of the Department of Health applauded the cancer care community for having reduced wait times, increased screening and improved patient experience, he still said change was needed to stop the UK lagging behind the rest of Europe in terms of mortality rate. He urged professionals to introduce rehabilitation packages that included diet and exercise post-treatment for cancers such as breast cancer, where he said such activity had drastically improved the quality of life and recovery of patients.

Of course, the debate did not take long to get onto GP commissioning and the White Paper. With the focus on outcomes, Richards said that the delegates had to start thinking about that instead. “If a clinical nurse specialist in a cancer ward or unit can improve patient experience, then let’s incentivise teams and trusts that exhibit that improvement in quality that comes after employing that post,” he said.

Patrick Ladbury of the National Social Marketing Centre

Patrick Ladbury of the National Social Marketing Centre

Positive thinking was on the mind of Patrick Ladbury of the National Social Marketing Centre. He was about to use the services of a nurse imminently, as his wife was due to give birth to their fourth child, but fortunately that didn’t happen while he was on stage so he managed to make all of his points. His lively presentation indicated how you had to change behaviours with marketing. Ladbury pointed to the Swine Flu ad that encouraged people to use a tissue when sneezing, and said that if this had been issued on the Metro paper on the London underground and given away with antibacterial handrub or tissues, the product would have broken down the barrier to change, and the marketing message would have been stronger.

He said marketing must break down those barriers, and pointed to a car seat for children drive among certain Hispanic communities in South America. There, women tended to carry their children on their laps instead of strapped in seats because they felt it was safer, and also that God would decide when to take their children. The campaign got around this by inviting a priest to bless the car seats. And in Odenplan in Sweden, 66% more people used the stairs rather than the escalator on the underground transportation system after Volkswagen sponsored an event that turned the steps into musical notes, which played as passengers walked on them. When using the steps became more fun, people sacrificed the ease of the escalator.

Ladbury’s message is that information and products alone are not enough – you must understand why people behave why they do, and then break down the barrier.

A delegate in an earlier session on breast cancer detection presented by Professor Amanda Rimez of King’s College London proved this point beautifully. She said she had enlisted the help of her local hairdressers to talk to women about breast cancer. “They may not ask their GP for advice, but if they’re reading Heat and talking about Jade Goody, the hairdresser can educate them about the signs,” she said. “After all, what woman doesn’t go to the hairdresser – and when they do, they tell them everything.”

The panel responds

The panel responds

Finding the way to communicate to your patients is becoming a lateral thinking job. And it’s more than just putting up a poster. There’s a lesson for us media types in there too.

Finally, a very happy birthday to our extremely talented and hardworking deputy online editor Victoria Thompson. Many happy returns Vic.

Thanks for taking the time to read

Jenni Middleton, editor, Nursing Times

Readers' comments (5)

  • Wow, it has been busy for you. Congratulations on the great work you all at Nursing Times

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • rovergirl6@hotmail.com

    you can now make a difference ,decide what your values and expectations for nursing in the future. and have the nerve to stand by your decisions . a couple of suggestions .
    please bring respect back into the profession by education.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • rovergirl6@hotmail.com

    oh and the second suggestion find some way of educating the hospitals that nurses uniforms should be kept on site laundered and

    worn only on duty . and never taken home .

    give the nurse time to kit up for her duty and have respect for her profession

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Agree with Sandra to an extent. I hope you bring a lot of improvements to this 'magazine', not least of which should be to start supporting Nurses a little more. The jouranlism often leaves a lot to be desired and often comes across as very patronising and taking on the typical RCN/government stance of kicking Nurses in the teeth, (case in point, I know apathy in Nursing is rife, but why exactly was the whole issue of Nurses striking to improve conditions and care for our patients swept under the carpet so quickly? That should have been a topic that you supported and ran with a lot longer, even campaigned for! But no, it was replaced very quickly by a few fluff articles), whilst important 'announcements' in health care often have little more than a sentence or two. Oh, and get rid of this subscription idea, Nursing knowledge should be free to Nurses, we are already forced to pay out enough to the NMC and RCN/Unison with absolutely nothing in return. If I needed to brush up/refresh my memory on a particular topic/skill in the past or check up on current best practice, the practice/research section was often one of my first stops. No longer.

    Settle in, then make improvements please.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Sandra Joyce Odell - you might need some evidence of what you're saying about uniforms. currently there's no evidence to support your point.
    In case you haven't noticed, the majority of harmful pathogens are inside the hospital, not outside. same with the majority of infected people, they're inside the hospital, not outside

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

newsletterpromo