Which political party deserves the nursing vote?
Armed only with the shiny sword of truth, Beyond the Bedpan slashes through the political foliage to reveal the facts behind the main parties’ health policies.
As the general election campaign gathers pace, amidst the mud-slinging and media hysteria, one thing is guaranteed - every political party will bend over backwards to prove that they are the true “party of the NHS”.
Nurses will be prime political currency, with politicians of all persuasions promising to recruit more of you, treat you better and empower you to lead services. This will last right up until the final votes are counted, at which time you go back to being largely ignored, and offered sub-inflation pay rises.
Cynical? Us? Let’s see what the the health policy blurb on the main parties’ websites has to say.
Labour
From a buoyant Tony Blair to a downtrodden Gordon Brown, the Labour Party has been around long enough to be blamed, rightly or wrongly, for all of the NHS’ problems.
Not that you can tell from the health policy page of its website: “The NHS is the Labour Party’s greatest achievement. We created it, we saved it, we value it and we will always support it. The NHS remains Britain’s most cherished public service and the fairest system of healthcare in the world.”
Broadly speaking, the claims seem fair. It was a Labour government that created the NHS in 1948. And since its 1997 victory, Labour has poured an unprecendented amount of money into the NHS. On their website, the party lists the recruitment of 89,000 nurses since Tony Blair’s first election victory at the top of its list of health-related achievements.
Conservatives
The Conservatives, predictably, are quick to trot out the “party of the NHS” maxim, despite the lack of historic credibility. While they acknowledge Labour’s financial commitment to the health service, they argue that the money has been wasted on “a decade of top-down, bureaucratic mismanagement” - which they promise to fix.
Labour stand accused of “undermining the professionalism of NHS staff and skewing NHS priorities away from patient care, creating a culture where ticking boxes is more important than giving patients the treatment they need”.
NHS targets have been widely and fairly criticised, but Beyond the Bedpan is a little insulted at the presumption that a mere political party could make nurses abandon the fundamental principles of patient care.
The answer is “making nurses accountable to patients,” as well as “making sure there is no hiding place for failure”. We assume they don’t mean public stonings for incompetent nurses, but specifics are thin on the ground.
A Tory government would also “drive up standards by allowing people to choose the best providers and by encouraging hospitals to compete for patients”.
Also known as “competition” and “patient choice”. Sound familiar?
Liberal Democrats
The Lib Dems “believe access to personal care should be based on need not the ability to pay”. Which is good because, in theory at least, it already is.
They also come down heavy on central targets, promising to scrap them altogether and “guarantee that you get your treatment on time”.
An epic promise, and one that cynics might feel could only be made by a party with little hope of an outright election victory.
Finally, the party would put “doctors and nurses back in charge of their hospitals and wards”.
So there you have it. In the red corner, a ruling party that stands accused of wasting billions on a wasteful and target-obsessed NHS. In the yellow and blue corners, a series of grand promises that seem literally too good to be true.
Who gets your vote? Let us know in the comments box below this article.
View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page |
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment.
Online training units, written and reviewed by experts. Earn two hours' CPD and a personalised certificate for your portfolio.
Subscribers get five FREE learning units and non-subscribers can access each learning unit for £10 + VAT.


'Lansley must listen to nurses on the front line'





Readers' comments (86)
Anonymous | 10-Apr-2010 9:39 am
Quite frankly I know who i'll be voting for and it wont be the airy fairy Concervatives or the Lib Dems I'll be sticking with the Labour party who believes in the NHS as other parties would have us all having to have private health care. It may not be a perfect nhs service but at least we'll still have one. I think that there should be less management especially ones with a non medical background who don't have a clue about the day to day running on the shop floor and more money invested in doctors and nurses who are.
Unsuitable or offensive?
Anonymous | 10-Apr-2010 10:35 am
I shall not vote for any of them wasters, Ill be voting UKIP because I believe in the UK not Europe.
Unsuitable or offensive?
Anonymous | 10-Apr-2010 10:42 am
as a scot who lived in the central belt of scotland during the thatcher years,i remember the tories sense of fair play. i also remember 4 years of trudging to the dss office to be looked down upon by sneering petty beurocrats who seemed to enjoy their work just a little too much,so even if i won the euromillions and had 50 million in the bank i still wouldn't vote for them. lib/dems.. pie in the sky, so that leaves labour and i'm of a minority who think GB is actually an honourable guy.
Unsuitable or offensive?
Anonymous | 10-Apr-2010 11:21 am
I have seen the good, the bad and the ugly in health care delivery. I started my nursing career in the NHS in 1966 when wonderful new hospitals were being built and nurses were beginning to be noticed as more than handmaidens to doctors. Nursing experience in N. Ireland, England and Scotland highlighted that care was more or less the same wherever it was delivered. Always striving to be the very best.
14 years nursing in the USA revealed the very good and the very bad. Good if you were rich, bad if you were poor. How horrific was the reality for a lot of people. What America is fighting for, we are privileged to have as a right.
Having been exposed to all of the above, my vote is definitely for the Labour Party. As a swing voter and realising there is a lot at stake in this election, we must not let the fundamentals of patient care and service delivery be undermined by those, who at their very core, have a different world view.
Flawed as it is, what human endeavour isn't, it is the best we have. I would fight for the basic principal of free health care at the point of delivery.
Kind regards
Unsuitable or offensive?
Anonymous | 10-Apr-2010 11:34 am
I havent a clue who to vote for They all treat nurses with contempt.I remember labour saying if they came into power there first job was to get rid of all the beurocarats in the NHS.Whats changed, nothing,well yes somethings changed as weve got more and more of them and noone on the shop floor doing the grafting.
Unsuitable or offensive?
Anonymous | 10-Apr-2010 11:35 am
Labour Labour Labour, how can anyone vote for anyone else.
The only possible opponent in this situation are the Tory's and I for one have not forgotten how they decimated the NHS in the 80's and early 90's by 1.putting in house services out to tender that drove down the quality of cleanliness. 2. Ken Clarke giving nurses a paycut 3 years in a row (inflation 3+% and pay rises 1%) which he says he's looking forward to doing again. 3. The Building Bridges document that meant anyone with common mental health problems were excluded from psychological therapies as 'the worried well' and 'not severe and enduring'. It has taken Labour to reverse that with the Increasing Access to Pyschological Therapies programme. Lets not have it all torn down again, vote Labour!
Unsuitable or offensive?
Angharad Thomas | 10-Apr-2010 12:15 pm
I am due to qualify this summer, I hate this election capaign already anyway but talks of job losses make me feel really down as searching for a suitable job is already difficult without having to pick the political party that will offer me the best chance for my career!
Unsuitable or offensive?
Anonymous | 10-Apr-2010 12:41 pm
I'll be voting Labour and I can't wait to get to that polling station to put that cross in that box, the Tories don't deserve to have power over the NHS - they will destroy it!
the reasons why I will be voting Labour include the fact that I have a well paid Nursing job waiting for me when I finish the coursein three weeks time that they have paid for me to complete. as well as their excellent 1 week promise for those suspected of having cancer and everything else they have done to make the NHS stronger and better than it was under the Tories.
Also:-
I work in Derby where we have a shiny new NHS hospital thanks to the Labour Governments investments in the NHS and policies on getting us better hospitals and more staff in them.
* Now I am not saying that they have got everything right but then who has. We all make mistakes, the biggest mistake we as Nurses can make is to give the NHS to the Tory Party! we have the power to protect the NHS so lets do that.
Unsuitable or offensive?
Theresa Ogwa Vembe | 10-Apr-2010 12:46 pm
I am for LABOUR! the devil you know is better than the angel you do not know. We are workers. Labour government is for the workers.
Unsuitable or offensive?
Anonymous | 10-Apr-2010 3:41 pm
http://www.ukip.org/media/policies/UKIPbudeconomy.pdf
a masterpiece from nick - who also plans to cut the 8 million public sector to 4 million, privatise health and education
14.2 There are rafts and rafts of regulations that drive a wedge between employers
and employees, such as equal pay, maternity rights, working time and the national
minimum wage. All of these result in lower employment and higher costs to
businesses.
14.3 UKIP will look to scrap the bulk of these. Full employment can only be
achieved by allowing the economy to grow, reducing the regulatory burden; reducing
taxes on employment (in particular Employer’s National Insurance) and reducing the
means-testing which leads to very high effective marginal tax-rates on the lower paid
(covered in more detail on UKIP’s welfare policy paper) and significantly reducing
the number of taxpayer-funded make-work jobs in the public sector.
Unsuitable or offensive?
Anonymous | 10-Apr-2010 3:47 pm
Lesson number one: a chancellor who wants to maximise his tax take should allow
the rich to get richer, not chase them away with punitive attacks.”
Unsuitable or offensive?
Anonymous | 10-Apr-2010 4:33 pm
I have worked in the community for 18yrs and never has moral been so low. All we hear about is 'Care in the Community' and less time in hospital for patients. That's all very well, but we struggle to manage the case loads we have at present, and we have now been told there is going to be a cut in staffing levels !!! So can someone tell me who exactly is going to look after these people. Labour may have recruted 89,000 nurses, but how many have left through stressful working conditions due to low staffing levels!!! Conservative for me, they can't make it any worse, so lets let someone else have a go.
Unsuitable or offensive?
Anonymous | 10-Apr-2010 6:14 pm
Having worked as a health visitor for the past 11 years, and witnessed the way Labour have destroyed the service, have wasted pots of money on change after change without stopping to evaluate properly, the way their policies have created communities where families and individuals live in povert, fear and isolation, I would rather not vote than put a cross next to one of their candidates.
Unsuitable or offensive?
tinkerbell | 10-Apr-2010 8:08 pm
I wanted to vote labour but can't after the lies told about the troops dying through lack of proper equipment and relatives having to buy them some of their basic kit. I can't vote tory because thousands had their homes repossessed when interest rates were 15% and they also started this nonsense with privatising the NHS. Yu can't make a profit out of people being sick. They aso got people to buy their council houses, including miners,then closed the coal mines. I'm at a loss as to who to vote for now i can't vote labour or Tory. Guess it will have to be lib dems.
Unsuitable or offensive?
Roger Hodgson | 10-Apr-2010 9:02 pm
Having endured Thatcher and her "Care in the Community" mantra followed by Blair and Brown, Labour's own second rate Tory impersonators who, instead of reversing the decent into accountancy based treatment and care proceeded with completing Thatcher's fiscally based policies, I can safely say I will vote for none of the mainstream parties.
After the disgusting fiasco of "Honourable Member's" expenses, none of them should be trusted with a roll of Micropore, certainly not the NHS.
.
Unsuitable or offensive?
Malcolm Chalk BA, RN | 10-Apr-2010 10:02 pm
If you vote for the tories you will be upholding anything the CBI want to do, such as destroying our pensions. Those thatcher days weren't so long ago, just remember what it was like then - or ask someone who does. I'm not a member of any political party, but have been around a few years now and long enough to know who is 'urinating down our backs, but telling us it's raining' and there will be a lot of that flowing across our backs if the right wingers get in. Don't vote tory!
Unsuitable or offensive?
Anonymous | 10-Apr-2010 10:52 pm
I can clearly remember the Thatcher years and would rather eat my own bodyweight in bedpan contents than vote for the tory party.
Lib Dems are too wishy washy and so like many others say that leaves Labour.
As a Scot I could go SNP though so still not completely sure who will get my cross.
Unsuitable or offensive?
Anonymous | 10-Apr-2010 11:14 pm
I have the same problem as other posters in that I agree with some of the policies of one party and some of another... so it may come down to whoever "matches" the most.
Sure I don't need to remind posters that any health policies touted in light of the upcoming election will have no bearing on Scotland due to devolution... suppose that makes it a little easier?
Unsuitable or offensive?
Anonymous | 11-Apr-2010 11:26 am
Tories will privatise and decimate the NHS further, they've already pledged this. They believe in power, priviledge and money in the hands of the few in order to control the majority. To subscribe to this belief you need to be comfortable p'ing on your colleagues, friends and family or be p'd upon.
Unsuitable or offensive?
Anonymous | 11-Apr-2010 11:50 am
The problem now is that there are a lot of voters who are not old enough to remember the Conservative days in power. I was the only one of my friends fortunate enough to be able to hang on to my job and be, just about, able to hang on to my home with a 15% mortgage interest rate (and with a very high overdraft and debts). No government can be perfect and I know I still have debts but things are better than they were and I can see light at the end of the tunnel. I remember Labour taking control and everyone in and out of the NHS were overjoyed. We shouldn't forget that and we should ensure that those not old enough to know the truth about the Conservatives is informed of what they did and what they will do again given the chance. We all want to do the best for ourselves but people should look at the wider picture and not just look at what the government can do for you but what it can do for us. Sorry if this sounds patronising but I hear some very selfish attitudes when it comes to tax and pay. Vote Labour.
Unsuitable or offensive?