Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

'Abuse' claim sparks regulator probe at Calderstones

  • 1 Comment

The foundation trust regulator Monitor has launched an investigation into Calderstones Partnership Foundation Trust, after allegations that a patient was abused there.

The regulator said it stepped in after a safeguarding case conference identified “shortcomings” in the way the specialist learning disability trust safeguarded its service users. Police investigated specific allegations of abuse earlier this year but decided to take no further action, it said in a statement.

Monitor said it would look into whether the episode may be evidence of wider problems with the way the Lancashire-based trust is run, and whether it could have prevented or reduced the risk of abuse. The regulator has also asked the Care Quality Commission to undertake an urgent review of standards of care at the trust.

Monitor regional director Robert Davidson said: “We want to make sure that patients are receiving the best possible standards of care, and we will look closely at how the trust is run to determine whether it has breached the conditions of its licence to provide NHS healthcare services.”

In response, Calderstones chief executive David Young said the trust had been working on the incident “for several months” with Monitor, the CQC and its commissioners.

“Three of the four issues raised by the Safeguarding case conference some weeks ago were either unsubstantiated or inconclusive,” he said.

“We take very seriously indeed this outstanding and isolated issue of abuse against a single service user. This has been a difficult time for everyone involved and our thoughts and concerns are with the service user and their family,” he said.

“Calderstones works with many extremely challenging individuals. Our staff have to act and think quickly to support them through each day,” Mr Young added.

“We acted very quickly to remove everyone who may have been involved in the incident and have worked very closely with the authorities through the investigation.”

It is understands the service user who reportedly suffered abuse was male, and Calderstones moved around 12 members of staff who had been working with him after it was alerted to the incident by a whistleblower.

Are you able to Speak Out Safely? Sign our petition to put pressure on your trust to support an open and transparent NHS.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • David Dickinson

    Well I am subject to an NMC FTP investigation having complained about repeated abusive seclusions + more at TEWV NHS forensic LD services during 2010. The result at the time was an internal investigation, a review report and new policy and the personal thanks from the Trusts CEO for raising the matter. What he didnt say was that my Trust computer accessings were being simultaneously counter investigated for which I was found guilty for accessing the victims file about whose abusive seclusion I had complained. However such accessing was normal and expected practice so was changed at appeal to "accessing for too long" although there existed no policy guideline about accessing time. The transcript revealed the ludicrous cover-up but of course, the Trust lost it despite two recorders. The seclusion investigation report acknowledged my modern contribution to the service. However, managers suggested to the NMC that my practice is out of date. The NMC's solicitor has developed Trust charges to the point of fabricating evidence.
    Welcome to the post Winterbourne world of nurse complainant support.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.