Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


Anne Marie Rafferty: 'Each and every one of us must take responsibility for our actions'


The Francis report can only go so far, the real test will be what we do when nobody is looking, says Anne Marie Rafferty

Nursing occupies a prominent place in the Francis report. The role that nursing plays in setting and upholding standards is to be applauded. Tough talk in enforcing standards and policing by the Care Quality Commission provides a road map for the future.

The report also recommends that the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence should provide the tools to support compliance with standards.

This should be a stimulus to speeding up the implementation of evidence-based standards.

NICE is a treasure trove, but an underutilised one with respect to its potential yield for nursing interventions. Similarly, NICE guidance on staffing should help to put the issue onto a stronger evidence-based footing, giving it the authority needed to get traction in the service.

Regulating healthcare assistants would also help to drive up standards and fill the policy void where currently a thousand standards bloom.

Physical inspection by hospital inspectors needs to be accompanied by the physical presence of leaders in care environments. Strengthening the visibility and volume of the nurse leadership voice is a major priority that needs investment and fast-tracking for role modeling, setting culture and shaping governance.

“Strengthening the visibility and volume of the nurse leadership voice is a major priority”

Poor care is the product of poor care environments. These environments may be patchy or more pervasive; but often pockets of poor care co-exist with good or excellent care.

Older people are especially vulnerable in the fast-moving world of the NHS. The Francis report is above all a cri de coeur to rethink how we look after older people in hospitals. Do we need a specialism? I’m not sure. Most people needing care in hospital are older so perhaps we need a special focus on older patients, who are vulnerable and at particular risk with investment in leadership to boost capacity in challenging areas.

Robert Francis recognises the demands of a complex system require the critical skills to stand up for standards and challenge authority. This is best cultivated by a rigorous education to provide the confidence to challenge the status quo.

We know instinctively when we walk into a ward what a good and poor environment is like - how we are greeted, the warmth of the welcome, the eye contact that sense of acknowledgement that we count.

It is what the journalist Malcolm Gladwell talks about in his book Blink. But I wonder how the blink test would stand up to scrutiny in comparison with all the metrics we have created to measure quality in the NHS?

It is not as if we have a shortage of data or systems to measure quality, rather the opposite. But do these capture the sentinel signals of poor care? Are trust boards equipped with the technical skills and know-how to offer challenge and critique? Compassion should be a priority for everyone in the NHS not just nurses.

Culture has also featured prominently in the report. A colleague, Jane Ball, from the National Nursing Research Unit at King’s College London, and I are piloting a culture of care barometer for use in trusts. We are holding focus groups with staff to test out the instrument.

The best definition I have heard about culture was from a nurse in our group: “Culture is what you do when nobody is looking.” We can root out poor practice, enforce zero tolerance and discipline those who observe poor quality but fail to act, but ultimately, as Mr Francis reminds us, it is up to each and every one of us to take responsibility for our own actions. So perhaps we should add another “C” to the CNO’s vision - “conscience”.

The Francis report has much to commend it in its forensic analysis and practical policy recommendations, but regulation and other tools can only go so far, the real test will be what we do when nobody is looking.

Anne Marie Rafferty is professor of nursing policy at King’s College London


Readers' comments (3)

  • When was the last time Ms Rafferty worked on a ward??? The best way to improve standards is to have more qualified nurses on the wards not regulating HCAs-I am sick to death of listening to nurses who are far removed from the bedside they really have no idea

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 12-Feb-2013 12:16 pm

    maybe they use these little interventions to show they are in touch with clinical nursing and CPD to keep their name on the register!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We have a plethora of reports, dashboards, groups, committees etc and have had for years but we still have Stafford's.
    Isn't this half the problem? Everyone is running around filling in this form, that checklist, thermometer this, monitor that, leaving little time to actually do the job.
    We must move on in the profession, medicine has developed thank goodness.
    I remember illness's when I trained that were talked about in hushed voices because we all knew the long term outcomes but now many live long & happy lives but that has come with more technology on general ward (including everything having to be done on a computer before the patient can have a blood test) that I never saw in ITU's when I was a student or even staff nurse, more patients who are really sick, higher turnover meaning more cleaning and paper work for the staff.
    However, what I have not seen is an increase in the staffing levels in all that time. Many things nurses do now was only done by doctors once upon a time - blood taking, IV drugs etc. Were we given more staff to account for that? I don't think so.
    Not doctor bashing either as I know they also feel the same way with meetings after meeting.
    The support services (clerks for that dreaded computer, relevantly trained support workers, housekeepers/ward domestics to clean those rooms that are needed in a hurry) also need investment. Maybe if the nurses did not have to fill in those endless forms on the computer so they can send the blood test, clean the room from floor to ceiling because there is no one from domestic services for hours, they might be able to get on with what they do best. Let nurses, nurse and doctors, doctor

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.