Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Barts in special measures after CQC rates Whipps Cross 'inadequate'


Whipps Cross University Hospital in east London has been rated as inadequate by the Care Quality Commission, which noted “serious concerns” about poor leadership, culture of bullying and low staffing levels.

The majority of the hospital’s services – including urgent and emergency care, care for older people, children and young people, and outpatients – require “significant improvements”, said the regulator in a report published today.

“Barts Health Trust has not given sufficient priority to safety. We found frequent staff shortages and a reliance on agency and locum staff that increased the risk to patients”

Mike Richards

The hospital is run by Barts Health NHS Trust, which confirmed it has been put into special measures, meaning it will receive support from regulators to turn its service around.

It is the largest trust in England – running six hospitals and employing 14,000 staff – but has recently struggled with finances and performance, and now has a planned deficit of £93m. A raft of senior managers, including its chief executive, chair and chief nurse – Professor Kay Riley – recently resigned.

The CQC noted more than 200 posts were cut across the trust in 2013 and several hundred more nursing staff were down-banded, which has had a “significant” impact on morale at the hospital.

However, on a positive note, staff were found to be caring in half of its eight services, and in particular the maternity and gynaecology services were highlighted for committed staff and examples of good practice.

But a high usage of agency nurses in Whipps Cross hospital’s emergency service in particular were noted, with day shifts frequently seeing 66% of nursing cover provided in this way.

A trust merger in 2012 had seen a significant number of experienced nurses leave. They had either not been replaced or their posts had been filled with more junior nurses, which had resulted in a negative culture within the department, said the CQC.

Most of the workers inspectors spoke to in the emergency department said they rarely took a break in a 12-hour shift due to time constraints.

“The trust must get a grip on what is happening here and on the low staff morale”

Mike Richards

The CQC spoke with four patients who had been in the emergency department during at least one mealtime – with some having been there for more than 10 hours –  and said they had not been offered anything to eat or drink, despite there being no medical reason for this.

A lack of skills due to the high use of temporary nurses was also noted by some staff – who reported some agency staff being unable to triage patients or give IVs .

Surgical wards were found to be experiencing similar problems, with three out of six not having a ward manager for up to three months and one had just one band 5 nurse covering 15 beds. Band 2 healthcare assistants were also found to be carrying out complex work, including care of tracheostomies and complex dressings.

Meanwhile, in the children’s service, there was a 40% vacancy rate for qualified nurses and 16% for unqualified nurses. An external review on the neonatal unit was conducted in October 2014, following a whistleblower raising concerns regarding staffing experience, knowledge and skills and action plan has been put in place.

Meanwhile, mandatory training for nurses fell far below the 90% target in many wards, with one having a completion rate of just 33% in infection control and basic life support.

In its assessment of older people’s care, the CQC found there was a high referral rate for patients with dementia to the specialist nurse, however many were not being screened for the condition.

Problems around capacity assessments for these patients – such as long waits for psychological assessments or them not taking place at all – were noted.

Issues with incident reporting were highlighted, with some staff saying they did not have time to report incidents and would not escalate inappropriate skills mix issues, due to fears of repercussions from senior staff.

“This report describes services that fall a long way short of what we aspire to. We are very sorry for the failings identified by the CQC in some of our services at Whipps Cross”

Peter Morris

Professor Sir Mike Richards, CQC chief inspector of hospitals, said: “I note that many of the failings which we found on inspection in November 2013 are still not resolved. In some areas there has been little progress – and this has been affecting the quality and safety of patient care.     

“We found frequent staff shortages and a reliance on agency and locum staff that increased the risk to patients,” he said. “The trust must get a grip on what is happening here and on the low staff morale.”

Barts chief exectuive Peter Morris said the trust had already taken steps to strengthen leadership at Whipps Cross, adding: “Barts Health is committed to ensuring the safety and welfare of every one of its patients.

“This report describes services that fall a long way short of what we aspire to. We are very sorry for the failings identified by the CQC in some of our services at Whipps Cross and we know the trust has a big challenge ahead.”

Responding to the decision by the NHS Trust Development Authority to place the trust into special measures, the Royal College of Nursing said organisations must “never again” see cuts to jobs and wages as a “safe or sustainable way to fix funding shortages in the NHS”.

It said the CQC report showed the extent of the pressures on staff working at Whipps Cross and that an “urgent” long term plan was required for the hospital, which should address a “historic culture of bullying”.



Readers' comments (14)

  • has anyone got the evidence base for this student age/cost-effectiveness debate? how many years will the average 50 year old student end up taking as a career break to raise a young family? how much does it cost to retrain the average once 20 year old student who returns after such a career break? i'd like to see the sums before advocating an upper age restriction for nursing students, especially when taking in to account the added value life experience can bring to the role.

    "this is not me being discriminatory, merely being realistic!!" (!!) ! !!... !


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • can I also point out that the nursing retirement age is changing to 65 (and probably going to rise) so a student nurse at 40 will have a career of 25 years plus !!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • im 42 and a final year student nurse. so still have a lot of years to give the nhs. what people arent aware of is the suffering we go through when we are training. we are treated badly by mentors and the workload is horrendous. and to top it all off the bursary is a joke. i have a 16 year old and get 700 pnds a month to live on. tht has to pay rent all bills and food. and yet ive stuck to it because i really want to make a difference. think about that before knocking down mature students.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 24-Mar-2015 11:06 pm

    the NHS and the public are lucky to have those with such attitudes and should value them and be endlessly grateful. One could argue that if you get through all the way you describe it, it is character building!!!!! but it really should not be that way and fortunately is not in other places in Europe. Everybody needs to make an effort to ensure everybody who passes through the NHS for whatever reason is treated with respect and has a positive, friendly and excellent learning experience.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 1020results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.