Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Can the NMC support our care delivery ambitions?

  • 1 Comment

It’s not that I don’t like the NMC. That in itself would be petty and irrelevant. I mean I don’t like knife crime, Liverpool Football Club or TV talent shows. Who cares?

And it’s not that I don’t acknowledge that we need the NMC - or something like it. A healthcare profession needs a regulatory body. Of course it does; it’s a horse and carriage kind of thing.

And it’s not even that I notice the NMC all that often. I mean they’re there in the background, a bit like a fading bruise. It twinges now and again but in the main you ignore it and get on with stuff.

It’s just that I’m not always sure what good they do. The striking off of ‘whistleblowing nurse’ Margaret Haywood for failing to gain the consent of her patients before secretly filming them to highlight profound failures of care isn’t a test of the NMC’s logic. But it may prove to be a test of its credibility.

The interesting thing about the Panorama case is that everyone involved can legitimately claim to be doing the ‘right thing’. The BBC can label themselves as ‘investigative reporters’ exposing poor services. The nurse involved can claim to be protecting patients by exposing low standards of care. And the NMC can claim to be protecting patients by adhering to the core principles of patient confidentiality.

‘The striking off of “whistleblowing nurse” Margaret Haywood isn’t a test of the NMC’s logic. But it may prove to be a test of its credibility’

Everyone can claim right is on their side. It is a festival of moral rectitude. Yet how much good is being done in the wake of the programme and the investigation? And why isn’t everyone simply asking: ‘What needs to happen to make things better?’

Because surely that is the collective responsibility facing not only nursing but also the NMC - to quite simply stop bad things from happening and to construct something useful and progressive from instances of failure. And it is hard to see how making the exposure of poor standards more difficult achieves that.

The NMC comments that it did not strike Ms Haywood off for ‘whistleblowing’ and in so doing it chooses not to engage with the complexities of whisteblowing. How, one wonders, might that protect the public in the future? Is that a responsible position? Or is it essentially a way of wiping one’s hands of the underpinning issues and ‘getting on with the job’?

Couldn’t it simply have done better? The NMC had a chance to demonstrate itself as being capable of not only thinking about the moral complexities that face some nurses but also of trying to intelligently address them. Instead it chose the easy route and in so doing looked to be a simple bureaucracy rather than a force for good.

And of course we can see how it did it. The line on confidentiality is clear. It can sleep easy and refer us all to the regulations. But is that good enough? If nursing charges itself with the responsibility to deliver the best care possible in sometimes challenging circumstances, is the NMC able to support that ambition? And if it isn’t shouldn’t we have a regulatory body that is?

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Dear Mark,

    I thoroughly enjoyed your article on the NMC, and applaud your courage and candidity. Please find below a letter which I sent to the NMC expressing my disgust at having to work through the entire summer as a student health visitor. I eagerly await a response.

    Thanks and Regards

    Mary Murphy
    Practising Nurse of 20 years service!

    Dear Advice,

    I am currently studying at this university on the above course. In June 2009 we, as a class, were informed that we had to complete a 10 week continous consolidation of Practice from 29th June until the 11th September 2009. We were "generously" awarded a 3 day break to be taken at different days but not together. Now, as you may appreciate this is an extremely long period without any holidays! I can't adequately express my and frustration, helplessness and guilt (as a mother) at these Victorian arrangements. I am the mother of a teenage daughter who will be returning to education in September but is at an age whereby she will not be holidaying with her parents again, I have therefore lost my final chance at spending this valuable time with my child. My endeavours to qualify and participation in this course have cost me dearly, it is ironic that as a Student health visitor I help others care for their families at the neglection of my own. I am devastated at the decision that my professional body has stipulated which is at odds with any family-compassionate iniatives presently in currency. I contribute to the NMC and as a professional body, I would request that this continous consolidation be justified to me. I would also request that you address in your correspondence how this requirement - that the NMC has stipulated - that I adhere to in order to qualify onto Part 3 of the register complies with the EC working directive and family friendly iniatives.

    Again I point to the irony that the NMC presents itslef as an organisation that supports nurses. In the most recent issues of NMC news Rosemary Kennedy asks, "Are we doing enough to sell nursing as a challenging and fulfilling career?" Clearly no! When the body which tasks itself with supporting nurses takes decisions which could potentially damage their personal and family lives and affects their student Health Visitors holistic well-being!

    I cannot express my downright sadness that my family holiday has had to be compromised for this course and due to your stipulations. I, as a mother, will never be able to retrieve this time with my husband and my children. So when my young son of 7 years states, "this has been a bad year mummy, you are never at home, and we woun't be having any fun together, like we had last year on holidays".

    I am heart broken! Why?

    Awaiting eagarily your response.

    Regards

    Mary Murphy

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.