Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

MPs to consider expansion of screening programmes

  • 1 Comment

The scientific merits of screening programmes for prostate cancer, lung cancer and post-natal depression are to be examined by MPs.

The Science and Technology Committee has launched an inquiry into national health screening programmes to see whether they should be extended to include such conditions.

Screening programmes - where people are tested for illnesses they might not show symptoms for - are carried out for a variety of conditions.

For example, the NHS Cancer Screening Programme was set up to detect whether people are suffering from breast, bowel and cervical cancer. Meanwhile the NHS Health Check screens adults for a number of common problems such as diabetes and heart disease.

After calls were made for such programmes to be expanded to cover more illnesses, the committee has launched the inquiry to examine the issue through scientific evidence.

Committee chair Andrew Miller said: “The NHS spends a significant amount of money on health screening and it is important that this is underpinned by good scientific evidence.

“Thousands of women are screened for breast cancer every year and lives are saved as a result. But there may also be women who undergo unnecessary treatment and surgery as a result of screening.

“Calls to extend screening to other conditions should ensure that there is good evidence that the screening would be effective.

“We will be examining the evidence base behind the decisions on which illnesses to screen for and will be asking whether we are currently getting these decisions right in the UK.”

Are you able to Speak Out Safely? Sign our petition to put pressure on your trust to support an open and transparent NHS.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • michael stone

    Didn't I read somewhere that almost no MPs understand the scientific method well enough to consider something's 'scientific merits' ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.