Men with prostate cancer are being given false hope by tests that underestimate the aggressiveness of their disease, a study suggests.
Researchers found that more than half of a group of men whose cancers were initially classified as slow-growing and confined turned out to have more dangerous tumours.
The findings, published in the British Journal Of Cancer, call into question the ability of specialists to grade and stage prostate cancers on the basis of biopsy samples.
It also casts doubt on the “active surveillance” strategy of avoiding unnecessary radical treatment for patients with slow-growing prostate cancer.
“The severity of up to half of men’s prostate cancers may be underestimated”
Instead, these patients are often closely monitored but left alone until tests suggest their condition has worsened.
Urological surgeon Greg Shaw, from the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, said: “Our results show that the severity of up to half of men’s prostate cancers may be underestimated when relying on tests before they have surgery.
“This highlights the urgent need for better tests to define how aggressive a prostate cancer is from the outset, building on diagnostic tests like MRI scans, and new biopsy techniques which help to more accurately define the extent of the prostate cancer,” he said.
“This would then enable us to counsel patients with more certainty whether the prostate cancer identified is suitable for active surveillance or not.
“Whilst active surveillance would seem to be a safe approach for some men, nearly a third will end up needing surgery or radiotherapy within five years,” he added.
Slow-growing prostate cancers, known as “pussycats”, are very different from the more aggressive and dangerous “tiger” variety.
In some cases, especially when he is older when diagnosed, a patient can live to the end of his normal life span before a “pussycat” cancer becomes a threat.
An aggressive “tiger”, on the other hand, may quickly spread if it is not surgically removed or destroyed.
Biopsy samples examined under a microscope are used to rate prostate tumour aggressiveness with a “Gleason score” ranging from two to 10.
A score of between two and six is a low-grade “pussycat”. A score of seven is intermediate, while scores of eight to 10 are high-grade “tigers”.
Tumours are also staged according to how far they have spread. A “T2” tumour is contained completely inside the prostate gland, while a T3 tumour has started to break out, and one classified T4 has reached other nearby organs or sites in the pelvic cavity.
The Cambridge scientists compared the staging and grading of more than 800 men’s cancers before and after they had surgery to remove their prostate.
They found that of 415 patients whose cancer was classified as slow-growing and confined to the prostate, just over half (209) were found to have a more aggressive disease than originally thought when assessed after surgery.
Almost a third (131) had cancers that had spread beyond the prostate gland.
“We need better methods of assigning a grade and stage”
The Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) blood marker test used to identify men who might have prostate cancer has long been known to be unreliable and prone to giving false readings.
Professor Malcolm Mason, Cancer Research UK’s prostate cancer specialist, said: “At the moment the biopsy, MRI and PSA tests that we use to assess the severity of prostate cancers are the best methods we have but, as this study shows, they don’t always get it right.
“Despite the limitations that this study shows, all evidence so far points to active surveillance being safe provided men are carefully selected.
“But we need better methods of assigning a grade and stage so that no man has to unnecessarily undergo treatment, while at the same time making sure we detect and treat the cancers that really need it,” he added.
Each year around 41,700 men in the UK are diagnosed with prostate cancer and 10,800 die from the disease.
- Read the full research paper in the British Journal Of Cancer