Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Inquest told doctor overruled senior nurse's request for X ray


A doctor ignored advice from nurses about a wrongly placed feeding tube, which contributed to the death of a patient at a London hospital, an inquest heard this week.  


A elderly woman with dementia died from a combination of natural disease, stroke and the “misplacement” of a feeding tube into her lung due a hospital blunder, a coroner has said.

Andriana Georgiou, an 84-year-old grandmother, contracted pneumonia and died 11 days after the error in December 2012 at the Homerton University Hospital in east London where she was being treated for a stroke.

Finnish trained consultant Dr Kari Saastamoinen made an “error” in using the “whoosh” test to verify wrongly that the tube was correctly inserted, Mary Hassell, senior coroner for inner London north told Poplar Coroner’s Court.

This was in spite of the test – where air flow is listened to in the tube to check whether it is in the right place – being the subject of three patient safety alerts since 2005, she said.

“The senior nurse asked the doctor for a check X ray but he opted instead to perform a whoosh test and he was then satisfied that the tube was in the right place – and feeding began,” Ms Hassell said, returning a narrative conclusion.

“It was not – a patient safety alert on February 21, 2005 and two subsequent alerts directed that the practice of using a whoosh test to check the position of a naso-gastric tube must cease immediately.”

The inquest also heard that the Homerton Hospital had drawn up policy ruling out the use of whoosh test after the first patient alert was issued in 2005.

The error was made on the morning of 4 December that year, but was not discovered until that evening, the inquest heard.

Nearly two litres of fluid had to be drained from her pleural cavity as a result. The error occurred in spite of there being “good” systems in place at the Homerton Hospital, Ms Hassell said.

She added: “Dr Saastamoinen was in contravention of the firm advice of a senior nurse, in contravention patient safety alerts dating back seven years, and in contravention of the hospital trust’s clear policy.”

However, she found Dr Saastamoinen not guilty of gross negligence after saying she could not return a verdict of unlawful killing.

Dr Saastamoinen told the inquest he had learned the “whoosh test” at medical school in Finland and had used it on several occasions in that country without problems.

He argued he has not been aware at the time that it was trust policy for a patient to go for a chest X ray where a litmus test indicated that there could be a problem, he said.

In December a further patient safety alert was issued by NHS England on the use of placement devices for inserting nasogastric tubes, following two recent patient safety incidents.


Are you able to Speak out Safely?

Sign our petition to put pressure on your trust to support an open and transparent NHS


Readers' comments (20)

  • michael stone

    'He argued he has not been aware at the time that it was trust policy for a patient to go for a chest X ray where a litmus test indicated that there could be a problem, he said.'

    Now, I'm 'assuming the clinical stuff as I go along here', but my main assumptions are simple:

    1) This tube reaches the stomach, a sample of fluid from the far end of the tube is what is being litmus tested, and that (see above) this was done in this case;

    2) The inside of the lungs, is nothing like as acidic an enviroment as the inside of a stomach - in particular, that although under rare circumsatnces a stomach can be much less acidic, lungs are almost never anywhere near as acidic as an 'acidic' stomach.

    So - as a litmus test was mentioned, and apparently raised a concern - presumably the test came back 'much too acidic for lungs': so what the heck, was going on there ?!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Had I have been one of the nurses involved in delivering the feed to this patient. I would have refused outright to administer it. Nurses be warned, do not ever let anyone take you into the realms of poor practice.

    Case closed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell

    Anonymous | 11-Jan-2014 1:41 pm

    Good for you, so would I. As a student I was stood by a doctor who was inserting a naso tube the wrong way round. I had no experience as still early on in training, or no experiences of previously doing this, as a psyche nurse on a general ward. When I pointed out it looked like he was putting it in the wrong way round, he asked, how do you know. I said 'cos on the packet it shows it should go in the other way round'.

    He said 'oh f*ck, thank you'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I hope that the nurse recorded his/her concerns and cascaded them to the rest of the nursing staff.

    One question though...

    If it had been the nurse that had made that mistake, would the nurse have 'got off' so lightly?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone | 11-Jan-2014 1:20 pm

    there is no fluid in the lungs under normal healthy circumstances so the litmus does not apply. Fluid in the lungs causes breathlessness and gives cause for rapid investigation!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    Anonymous | 11-Jan-2014 8:40 pm

    Well, there is moisture in the lungs - and this piece appeared to indicate that a litmus test had been performed, and had caused concern to the nurses if not to this medic.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This happened to me back in the prehistoric 80's. I passed the NG tube, it was a difficult procedure. The guy went for an X-ray and I went off duty. The x-ray was NOT checked and feeding commenced. The guy died and I went to a coroners court.Strange how lessons have not been learned in the intervening years.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lessons have been learnt, they are just not being followed.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Michael I don't think he did the Litmus test at all. He did the whoosh test which is simply listening with a stethoscope. It is a totally unreliable method and went out of fashion years ago because it was clearly unsafe.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If a Chest x-Ray is policy in this facility then, unfortunately, the nurse is guilty of proceeding with the feeding without the x-ray. In Canada, where I live, I would be held responsible as the RN.
    The nurse needs to insist that the hospital policy be followed, without the x-Ray the nurse is prohibited from proceeding with the feeding.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 1020results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs