Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Cochrane summary

Educating patients to prevent diabetic foot ulceration

  • 1 Comment

Download a print-friendly PDF file of this article here

Foot ulcers are a common and serious complication of diabetes. A systematic review evaluated preventive patient education

Review question

Can educating people with diabetes about foot care help to reduce foot ulcers and amputations?

Nursing implications

Foot ulceration is a common problem for people with diabetes, especially those with peripheral neuropathy and/orperipheral vascular disease.

Individuals who develop these types of ulcers may need a total or partial amputation of the affected limb.

Foot ulcers can not only lead to physical disability and loss of quality of life for patients but also increase costs in healthcare
and affect employment. The thrust of health promotion should therefore be towards preventing foot ulcers from occurring.

A systematic review was undertaken to examine patient education programmes designed to prevent diabetic foot ulcers.

Study characteristics

This summary is based on a Cochrane systematic review containing 11 randomised controlled trials with a total of 2,686 participants aged over 18 years with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

The studies evaluated educational programmes that aimed to reduce foot ulcer incidence. Foot care education could be
part of a larger educational programme, as long as it contrasted with the control intervention. An explicit focus on foot care was required. There was no minimum number of sessions stipulated. All types of control interventions were considered for education

Primary outcomes were: foot ulceration or ulcer recurrence and amputation. Secondary outcomes included disease-oriented outcomes such as: callus development; resolution of callus; fungal infection; and number and duration of hospital admissions for diabetic foot problems.

Trials explored the effect of foot care education as part of general diabetes education and compared it with usual care, and the effect of individually designed foot care education compared with no intervention. Intensive educational packages were compared with brief educational interventions.

Most of the studies were at high or unclear risk of bias and only one was considered to be at low risk.

Summary of key evidence

Of the 11 included studies, only four assessed the occurrence of foot ulceration and amputation as an end result following
foot care education interventions.

One study showed that, after a one year follow-up, one hour of group education given by a podiatrist had reduced the incidence of foot ulcers and amputation. However, this study was considered to be at high risk of bias as, for example, there was no allocation concealment, and blinding of participants was not explicit in the report.

One similar but more methodologically robust study did not confirm this finding. The other two studies did not demonstrate
any effect of education on ulcer incidence or amputation but were underpowered.

Short-term, positive effects of foot care knowledge was demonstrated in five out of eight studies in which this was assessed. However, this difference of effect was shown to have disappeared after seven years in one study. Similarly, patients’ selfcarebehaviour at six and 18 months was shown to have improved in seven of the nine studies that assessed this outcome.

Two studies described temporary improvements on callus, nail problems and fungal infections after an educational intervention.
While some results suggested positive effects, they should be viewed with caution due to the lack of methodological quality of the studies.

There is insufficient robust evidence that limited patient education alone is effective in achieving clinically relevantreductions in ulcer and amputation incidence.

Further research of better methodological quality should explicitly define the content of the educational packages and show a clear distinction between what is considered standard education and the experimental packages.

Best practice recommendations

The review found that there is currently no research to support the use of education alone to prevent foot ulceration and amputations. However, because diabetes has enormous and growing effects on individuals, increasing patient awareness of the implications of not caring for their feet must be part of educational packages and within all nurses’ health promotion role.
The study does indicate that more intensive and comprehensive preventive interventions may be needed to achieve clinically relevant reductions in ulcer and amputation incidence.

The full review report, including references, can be accessed by clicking here.

Ruth Rojahn is senior lecturer, De Montfort University, Leicester, and a member of the Cochrane Nursing Care Field

  • 1 Comment

Related files

Readers' comments (1)

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.