Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Colleges and charities defend end of life care pathway


More than 20 organisations have signed a statement seeking to rectify “misconceptions and often inaccurate information” about the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient.

The group of charities and royal colleges said accusations that the pathway was a way of withholding treatment, including hydration and nutrition, risked detracting from the “substantial benefits” it could bring to patients.

For example, in June newspapers quoted a doctor as saying it had become an “assisted death pathway rather than a care pathway”, with pressure on hospital beds leading to older patients being put on it too early.

The group have signed a consensus statement to provide “clarity” about what the pathway “is – and what it is not”. Signatories include the Royal College of Nursing, Marie Curie Cancer Care, Macmillan Cancer Support, and the National Nurse Consultant Group (Palliative Care).  

The statement says the pathway is a framework for good practice, which “does not replace clinical judgement”. It requires staff to ensure all decisions to continue or stop a treatment are taken in the “best interest of each patient”.

The pathway should not “hasten or delay death”, but ensure the right type of care is available in the last days or hours of life “when all of the possible reversible causes for their condition have been considered”, the statement adds.

RCN long-term conditions adviser Amanda Cheesley said: “We want to make it clear that it is not in any way about ending life but about supporting the delivery of the best possible end-of-life care.”


Readers' comments (44)

  • MeThinks

    “best interest of each patient”.

    The issues involve the definition of what that phrase means. And also exactly what the following one means:

    “does not replace clinical judgement”.

    Lack of clarity about those, leads into a legal minefield!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • any guidelines are only as good as those who apply them!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Where is the lack of clarity? The Liverpool care pathway is used for end of life care when all reversible causes have been exhausted. It is not withdrawing care, it is ensuring all care is clearly documented. All staff need to agree for the patient to go on it and it is not used to hasten death, but to ensure they have a dignified death!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    Anonymous | 1-Oct-2012 11:40 am

    One issue over clarity, is how one would define 'being on the LCP'. A second point, is you didn't make it clear if patients need to agree to being on the LCP ? And there is a fundamental difference between care and documentation. Who decides what amounts to 'dignified' ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The LCP is in integrated care pathway, it is used instead of documenting in nursing and medical notes. The principal behind it will be discussed with the patient (if appropriate) and their family. You can define dignified how u please. As long as you feel you have done your best for your patient in the last days of life. Perhaps you need to speak to your palliative care team for some education on the issue.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 1-Oct-2012 11:40 am

    "All staff need to agree for the patient to go on it"

    and the patient ...?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is discussed with the patient if appropriate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    Anonymous | 1-Oct-2012 2:23 pm

    Anonymous | 1-Oct-2012 2:56 pm

    I wasn't Anonymous | 1-Oct-2012 2:37 pm
    by the way - the issue is

    'It is discussed with the patient if appropriate.'

    who decides 'if it is appropriate' ?

    And 'dignity' should normally be the patient's concept of dignity, not anybody else's concept of dignity.

    There are some legal issues here, which I've outlined in other places on this site: legally, it seems pretty clear that clinicians do not decide what 'best interests' mean, and that capable patients have to give permission to be treated (on a treatment-by-treatment basis) - if the patient can't do that, then the law does not say 'clinicians decide and have the final word' {even if some clinicians think the law does say that}.

    And a question re Anonymous | 1-Oct-2012 2:23 pm:

    'Perhaps you need to speak to your palliative care team for some education on the issue.'

    To which poster, was that comment addressed (it seems specific) ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Writing as a journalist (Catholic Herald) on the LCP, I described it – following chats with experts and reviewing the reports – with general approval. Of course I was attacked for my pains – the usual stuff, and from doctors. However I did make the point that abuse of LCP was possible, and that the patient or relative should ask to see the hospital’s protocol, and should then reassure themselves by discussing it with a competent person. I recommended that any hospital not being willing to do this (or answer any question of concern) should immediately require a second opinion. I think it’s important, even if the large majority of hospitals are punctilious, to be aware that this is not 100%.

    The public are often afraid of medical staff; they may even believe that if they make trouble their relative will suffer.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I guess it's not 'appropriate' to discuss the LCP or any other care with a patient who is unconscious or so near death that a discussion would be very distressing for them.

    Acting in the patients best interests is what doctors do, whether it's saving someones life or withdrawing futile treatment. No-one ever accuses a doctor of 'playing God' when a patient survives, despite what the patient might have wanted given the choice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.