Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Hospital trusts are 'fiddling' patient mortality data, claims report


The way hospitals record patient deaths could be covering up poor treatment and costing lives, claims a new report from data analysts.

Figures show a dramatic rise in the number of people recorded as needing “palliative care” at the end of their lives, with some hospitals saying more than 35% of their patients die this way.

Healthcare analysts Dr Foster claim in their report that hospitals could be hiding the fact patients were admitted for treatment which then failed.

Some hospitals may also be “fiddling” the figures to make their death rates appear better than they actually are, they said.

Data from across England in 2012-13 showed 36,425 deaths were coded as palliative – meaning people received some sort of care to relieve suffering at the end of their lives.

This was 17.3% of the total number of deaths and is almost double the 9.1% (2,1130) recorded as needing palliative care in 2008. In 2006, just 3.3% of deaths were palliative.

Some hospital trusts have massively outstripped this national rise. Out of 142 hospital trusts in the report, almost half (60) recorded the number of people needing palliative care in 2012 as higher than the national average.

Most of the 20 trusts with the biggest leaps in their palliative care coding have also significantly improved their performance on death rates between 2008 and 2012.

Palliative care deaths are not included in the hospital standardised mortality ratio (HSMR), which compares the expected rate of death in a hospital with the actual rate of death.

Trusts that code deaths as palliative effectively “remove” deaths from being included in the HSMR.

Professor Sir Brian Jarman, from Imperial College London, developed the HSMR. He told the public inquiry into Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust that some trusts increased their coding of palliative care deaths to reduce overall death rates.

He said: “I am concerned that trusts know that increasing their palliative care rates assists their HSMR and am concerned that this could be the reason they are doing it.”

“The end result is that the variation in coding may disguise poor outcomes”

Roger Taylor

Roger Taylor, director of research at Dr Foster, said some trusts had changed the way they recorded deaths as a means of improving monitoring of palliative care.

But he said there were “real concerns around the gaming of indicators”, adding: “Whether or not you are doing it deliberately, the end result is that the variation in coding may disguise poor outcomes.”

He said “imprecise rules” governing how hospitals code deaths was harming patient care, may distort death rates and needed urgent review.

“The rules are too vague,” he said. “Poor quality data is harming patients because you can’t see where things are going wrong and you can’t see where there are issues.”

Tory MP Charlotte Leslie, a member of the House of Commons health committee, said: “This is very worrying data.

“We already know that at the time of the Mid Staffs scandals, hospitals were fiddling the figures to massage their mortality rates.”


Readers' comments (22)

  • michael stone

    Anonymous | 29-Mar-2014 3:23 pm

    Not only is some NHS data not 'standardised', but the meaning of certain words used within the NHS and healthcare in general frequently lacks consistency and clarity.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell | 30-Mar-2014 12:52 pm

    what makes you say that cutting the bingo tax is tosh?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone | 30-Mar-2014 1:24 pm

    from Anonymous | 29-Mar-2014 3:23 pm

    for example?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell

    Anonymous | 30-Mar-2014 5:02 pm

    apologies if you play bingo or drink beer and nothing against that but we need a bit more incentive to vote tory - surely, like stop privatising OUR NHS, stop freezing our wages and stop dumbing down everyone's education and keeping others from having a decent education because they can't afford to go on to further education.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell | 30-Mar-2014 6:53 pm

    from Anonymous | 30-Mar-2014 5:02 pm

    I always thought bingo was rather more a labour thingy. i had lotto in my toy box. is that the same thing?

    drinking beer seems to be a Farage thingy as he more often than not appears in photos with a glass in his hand?

    how has all of this crept into dealing with all the other serious issues. were these tory ideas? perhaps they are trying to deflect from any mention of the introduction of private insurance in the final stages of the reforms until after the elections as, although it has been proposed by both cons and lab, nobody wants to be responsible for introducing it for fear of the reactions of the public.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell

    this campaign by the tory poster for 'hard working people' is the feel good factor. Are we feeling better now there's a penny off a pint?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell | 31-Mar-2014 8:43 am

    yes, people can afford to drink themselves faster into oblivion!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    Anonymous | 30-Mar-2014 5:03 pm

    For example:

    'Palliative' - this means 'non curative'. But you can be curing a patient of a condition while also providing 'palliative' treatments, such as morphine for pain relief. The NHS has got a tendency to describe final-year-of-life patients, once identified as 'last 12 months', as 'pallaitive patients' - but such patients could still be receiving curative treatments for some illnesses. This isn't all that 'clear'.

    'End-of-Life' - this term can mean final year of life (predicted), final 6 months of life (predicted), or in some cases people use it to mean 'final days of life'. The statistics people, usually only have retrospective data, harvested post-mortem: so the statistics tend to retrospectively describe as 'end-of-life' patients from 12 months before their (known as opposed to predicted) death.

    'Dead' - most/many paramedics describe any person who they find in cardiac arrest but not 'very clearly long deceased' as 'dead': they attempt CPR, and sometimes bring 'dead' pateints back to life. I don't consider that resuscitation can work on dead people - my definition of 'dead' would be 'beyond the point at which any treatment could restore the person to life'.

    I'm sure that there are loads of others, but it is the EoL stuff that I read, so that is where I can give concrete examples from.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone | 31-Mar-2014 2:29 pm

    Anonymous | 30-Mar-2014 5:03 pm

    go and work on the wards for a few years and find out for yourself!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • George Kuchanny

    When we get to 'palliative care' we find that it is too often a euphemism for 'sedate to death'. These are two very different things. Check out what the Belgians mean by 'palliative care' quite remarkable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.