Standardised training of aseptic technique has improved nurses’ ability to prevent healthcare-associated infections and led to better awareness in one hospital
Aseptic technique (AT) is central to reducing healthcare-associated infections. This article describes how Golden Jubilee National Hospital provided training for staff on one ward that resulted in them having a better awareness of AT. Nine out of 10 staff completed four key e-learning modules as part of a structured “model ward” approach. Challenges included freeing up staff time and creating opportunities to observe practice after module completion.
Citation: Crawford A et al (2015) Standardising aseptic technique to avoid HCAIs. Nursing Times; 111, 11, 16-18.
Authors: Alexa Crawford is tissue viability nurse specialist at Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank; Janice Bianchi is honorary lecturer, Glasgow University; Gill Walker is programme director healthcare-associated infection, NHS Education for Scotland.
- This article has been double-blind peer reviewed
- Scroll down to read the article or download a print-friendly PDF here
Aseptic technique (AT) is a procedure designed to minimise the risks of exposing a person to pathogenic micro-organisms during simple and complex procedures. It is central to reducing healthcare-associated infections and vital in preventing infections associated with invasive devices in hospital and community settings. Using a variety of ATs in different hospitals - or even within a single hospital - is believed to contribute to HCAI development (Aziz, 2009). This variety in technique is mirrored in community settings (Unsworth and Collins, 2011).
Preventing HCAI spread in Scotland
NHS Education for Scotland (NES) is a special health board responsible for supporting NHS services in Scotland by developing and delivering workforce education and training. Its HCAI team leads the educational elements of the Scottish Government’s healthcare associated infection task force delivery plan on the prevention and control of infection, and is responsible for providing educational resources to support HCAI prevention, decontamination and antimicrobial stewardship across all clinical professions and non-clinical disciplines in NHS Scotland (NES, 2014a).
To promote a standardised approach across Scotland, in 2012 NES developed and launched the Aseptic Technique e-learning programme. In NHS Scotland there is now a consistent message on the application of asepsis, and the e-learning programme has become a vital component in helping NHS boards to achieve reduction in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemias and avoid harm.
The Aseptic Technique programme
The Aseptic Technique programme was developed based on the best available evidence at the time and includes modules covering seven key topics (Box 1). Each module takes 30-45 minutes to complete and includes a formal assessment, an example of which is given in Box 2. The assessment at the end of the modules comprises four multiple-choice questions. Staff must score 75% to pass; if they fail they must retake the assessment.
Box 1. Topics in the Aseptic Technique e-learning programme
- Module 1: Principles of aseptic technique
- Module 2: Insertion of a peripheral vascular catheter
- Module 3: Taking a blood culture sample
- Module 4: Inserting an indwelling urethral catheter
- Module 5: Applying aseptic technique when carrying out wound care
- Module 6: Taking a specimen for microbiological examination
- Module 7: Central vascular access devices (added 2015)
Box 2. Module 1: learning outcomes
On completion of the first module, you should be able to:
- Define the term “aseptic technique”
- Identify when an AT should be used
- Explain why there are variations in AT procedures
- State the potential sources of microbial contamination
- Identify non-aseptic steps and how to maintain asepsis
The programme uses video footage to demonstrate aseptic procedures and practices, as practical skills benefit from visual and auditory learning. For all healthcare staff to successfully apply the AT and implement the programme, a standardised support process at NHS board level is required to support training and education.
After the modules were developed, a series of live roadshows visited every health board in NHS Scotland to tell them about the online training, how to access it, and general AT protocol. After these events, NES offered extra support to all the health boards to aid with further implementation.
Golden Jubilee National Hospital (GJNH) in Clydebank bid for this support and an assistant clinical educator was appointed as the facilitator to run an improvement project, using a “model ward” technique where staff could develop their understanding and undertake the online training. As well as the work done on the model ward, the e-learning modules were publicised across the hospital through various media. The work was also presented in poster format at the 2014 NHS Scotland Event (NES, 2014b).
Different methods have been used to encourage a standardised approach to good practice. The innovative model ward approach was first introduced as part of the 1000 Lives Plus campaign in Wales, with a model ward described as “a benchmark of how wards should be” (Gray, 2011). Wards in hospitals across Wales focused on different patient safety projects including reducing infection and increasing hand hygiene compliance. In each ward, staff were given education and asked to feed back to refine the process. The ultimate aim was reducing harm and for this to be mirrored in every hospital in Wales.
As the model ward method had been used effectively to develop tissue viability quality improvement tools for NHS Scotland, it was decided to adopt this method.
Promoting the programme
The e-learning modules were promoted at GJNH from June to December 2013 via two key methods: the model ward and advertising. The model ward involved was the cardiothoracic unit, 3 West; the process facilitator worked with staff over six months. NES supported the facilitator with regular meetings to review the process and help with issues as they arose.
The facilitator worked closely with ward staff to encourage module participation and liaised with ward managers to coordinate uptake. On a few occasions they visited the ward in the evenings and early mornings to engage staff working night shifts.
In addition to this, the communications team worked with the facilitator to publicise the modules across the hospital. Posters and flyers were made available to all staff. Information about the modules was also set as the default computer screensaver, publicised in the hospital e-digest and quarterly staff magazine, and spread via word of mouth. The modules were also added to the doctors’ e-learning programme, and all new clinical staff joining the hospital during this period were encouraged to do the modules as part of their induction.
Completion of the modules
Table 1 (attached) details the monthly uptake of modules in the whole hospital over the six months. Fig 1 shows the percentage of completions of particular modules on the model ward. Model ward staff members were asked to complete four modules - 1, 3, 6 and 5 in order of priority - and to complete the other two if relevant to their practice. More than nine out of 10 staff completed the four higher-priority modules (Fig 1, attached).
Evaluating the training
After the implementation period, staff members from the model ward were observed in practice. This indicated a demonstrable raised awareness of AT. The facilitator then further evaluated the work of clinical staff in the following areas:
- Wound swabbing;
- Wound care;
- Blood culture collection.
All clinical staff accurately followed all the steps of the wound swabbing process, as outlined in the modules. An increased awareness of wound swabbing policy was also noted among staff.
Although there were general improvements in wound care, three out of five clinical staff still opened dressing packs before removing old dressings despite this not being the method outlined in the modules. As this practice seemed logical, on review by the facilitator and NES staff, the procedure guide was changed to accommodate this. The dressing back is now opened and the old dressing removed, then hand hygiene carried out so there no risk of contamination. Wounds are also exposed for a shorter period of time which is good practice.
All staff observed continued to use soap and water to wash their hands despite the module stating that alcohol-based hand rub is adequate. All the other steps of the process were followed as per the module.
Blood culture collection
During simulated practice, it was observed that staff were more aware of AT, particularly the need to clean tops of bottles with an alcohol swab. Most staff preferred to use sterile gloves despite this being unnecessary in terms of AT practice. One staff member said they occasionally forgot to document the procedure; otherwise all steps were followed by all staff.
In response to the evaluation of the AT training project, the hospital has continued to promote the online modules. Several measures have been put in place to ensure the ongoing development of module uptake across all clinical staff:
- Hospital nursing staff are asked to complete the foundation module before doing any core skill updates. New staff will to be asked to complete the modules for induction training.
- Blood culture collection training is incorporated in the venepuncture study day, with staff being asked to complete the relevant module before the session.
- A plan to train existing staff to take blood cultures is currently being discussed with clinical educators.
We are developing a blood culture record sticker to be trialed in cardio-thoracic wards. This will be placed in the patient’s notes when blood cultures have been taken and will prompt staff to document the procedure including the draw site, date and time of the sample, and the name and signature of the person who took the sample. It will also prompt staff to use the correct technique.
Challenges with implementation
The two main problems encountered by the facilitator implementing the model ward project were time constraints and staff engagement. The senior charge nurse on the model ward agreed to allocate staff time to complete the modules but delays were encountered due to workload pressures.
For some staff members, anxiety during observation of practice was also evident; for these individuals, reassurance about the rationale of the project and consequent observation of practice helped alleviate anxiety. Conversely, staff may have also made more effort to get things right because they were being observed, thereby not necessarily behaving as they normally would.
Another issue encountered was with observation of AT practices when taking blood cultures. This was due to the fact that it is impossible to predict when cultures will need to be taken. To overcome this problem, simulated practice and discussion was used to evaluate technique.
If undertaking a similar project it may be beneficial to have more specific time frames for the completion of modules. This would lead to more efficient use of both staff members’ and the facilitator’s time. The audit results suggest the model ward is an effective method of embedding a standardised approach to AT into practice, although staff engagement, a structured approach and a dedicated facilitator are vital to success (Box 3).
Box 3. Success factors and wider impacts
- Engagement of staff at all levels was essential for the project goals to be achieved
- The model ward method - a structured approach - was key to the project’s success
- Having a dedicated facilitator ensured the project remained a priority
- Publicising the e-learning programme throughout the hospital resulted in increased uptake of the programme outside of the model ward
- Application of learning from this initiative can be used more widely
In 2015, NES will launch two more modules:
- AT with central vascular access catheters;
- AT with arteriovenous fistulas.
NES is also undertaking some targeted work with other NHS boards in Scotland to align further AT practice with the e-learning modules. A comprehensive package of delivery is being developed in light of the findings from GJNH. This package incorporates behaviour patterns, along with potential barriers and levers to using a consistent AT, and will further the creative development of new ideas to increase uptake and engagement across the professions.
The model ward approach, along with publicity by the communications department, resulted in high numbers of clinical staff completing the e-learning education programme.
The application of AT is central to reducing HCAIs and is vital for the prevention of infections associated with invasive devices. Uptake of the e-learning programme, in its entirety, has been successful across Scotland with more than 15,300 modules completed since its launch.
- Aseptic technique aims to minimise patients’ risk of healthcare-associated infection
- Failure to standardise aseptic techniques may contribute to the development of healthcare-associated infection
- The “model ward” method can be used to help standardise aseptic technique
- Aseptic technique training can be delivered via e-learning for ward staff
- Nurses demonstrated better awareness of aseptic technique after completing e-learning modules
Aziz AM (2009) Variations in aseptic technique and implications for infection control. British Journal of Nursing; 18: 1, 26-31.
Gerolemou L et al (2014) Simulation-based training for nurses in sterile techniques during central vein catheterization. American Journal of Critical Care; 23: 1, 40-48.
Gray J (2011) A Model Ward that Delivers the Best Care.
NHS Education for Scotland (2014a) Healthcare Associated Infections.
NHS Education for Scotland (2104b) Model Ward Project.
Unsworth J, Collins J (2011) Performing an aseptic technique in a community setting: fact or fiction? Primary Health Care Research and Development; 12: 1, 42-51.